Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:paul@w8aef.com: 83 ]

Total 83 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] LM472 ? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:42:47 -0000
Tashjian Towers makes and sells the LM-470 now. They have a web site and they advertise in QST. de Paul, W8AEF _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00700.html (7,841 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] A3S (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 15:54:07 -0000
For a better check on antenna SWR with the antenna located near the ground - point it straight up with the reflector above the ground. A yagi pretty much ignores everything in back of the reflector.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00789.html (8,873 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Tapered tower hazer (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:32:52 -0000
Or, if you are not going to install a 20 foot mast on the rotator just letting the antenna be slightly out-of-plumb won't hurt. Esthetics aside, it won't make any difference to the rf. I tinkered wit
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00818.html (9,721 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Just when I thought AZ was safe (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 02:52:34 -0000
I was interested in CC&R's in Arizona several years ago and I found that state law required them to be enforced by an HOA. No HOA, no CC&R enforcement. And selective inforcement was not legal. That i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00894.html (8,983 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] [BULK] - Re: [BULK] - Re: [BULK] - Re:TowerRestrictions (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:19:13 -0000
We have one of those darned McMansions in our neighborhood. The neighbors circulated a petition against it so the owners (4 families) erected a 6 foot wall around it. We decided the wall was sufficie
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00970.html (8,742 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Relay Specs - Coax switch (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 04:25:40 -0000
I built a remote antenna relay box 9 years ago using Radio Shack DPDT relays with contacts rated at 10 amps (I paralled the contacts). Works fine and running full power. Drove the 2KD-3 at 150 watts
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00989.html (9,205 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] [BULK] - Re: Tower Restrictions (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 22:50:39 -0000
Arizona state law requires CC&R's to be provided at closing. Doesn't always happen but that is the law. And it is the opinion of at least one real estate attorney in Arizona that if you don't like th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00024.html (10,064 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Guying a self-supporting tower - Yes (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 20:50:52 -0000
This thread contains a lot of speculation and very little substance. I have always guyed towers - self supporting or not, and have never lost one. Has anyone ever lost a self supporting tower because
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00331.html (10,463 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] OB17-4 & WARC7 combo (score: 1)
Author: <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:34:29 -0000
My WARC-7 is on a tower by itself so can't help on the stacking, but -- My WARC-7 had no front to back on 30m. A long story but I wound up moving the shorting wires on the reflector out 8" from the F
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00558.html (7,971 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] WARC7 feedline question (score: 1)
Author: <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 16:55:44 -0000
I use a Force 12 balun on mine. de Paul, W8AEF _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00662.html (7,783 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Pro-67B (score: 1)
Author: <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 15:55:21 -0000
While at XZ0A I worked several hams in Phoenix on 40m, the loudest was using a Pro-67 at 72 feet. And all the Phoenix hams were running similar power. de Paul, W8AEF _________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00064.html (9,492 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] WARC 7 questions (score: 1)
Author: <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 17:51:00 -0000
My WARC-7 worked fine on 12 & 17, however on 30 it had no front to back. By placing a known signal source about 100 feet away from it and observing for f/b, I found it was best at 9.5 MHz. Moved the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00159.html (8,616 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] mounting large antenna question (score: 1)
Author: <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 04:08:10 -0000
I like to install my truss support on the boom, near the mast clamp. This way my trusses are already in place and when the antenna goes on the tower I only have to worry about the boom to mast connec
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00164.html (8,011 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] mounting large antenna question (score: 1)
Author: <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 15:23:39 -0000
tape No. I actually install a piece of aluminum angle about 3 feet long on the boom, near the boom to mast clamp. One end clamped to the boom and the other end pointing straight up with 2 eyebolts at
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00169.html (8,335 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Text Messaging VS CW Results - Jay Leno Show (score: 1)
Author: <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 04:21:59 -0000
I don't think this is true with voice. Let the contesters log in on this one for voice vs cw rates. And for traffic handling where accurracy is critical cw will win every time. de Paul, W8AEF _______
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00388.html (9,141 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] Thief (score: 1)
Author: <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 18:52:50 -0000
Thanks for the heads up Ed. It just happens I have both of the thrust bearings he is looking for. If he does contact me I will wait until his funds have cleared my bank before shipping. Just in case
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00440.html (8,246 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Tri-Ex LM-354HDSP (score: 1)
Author: <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 02:18:50 -0000
I purchased a manual package from Tashian Towers for my LM-470 when I was going through the permit process. It included two D size blue prints that would be tough to reduce to 8 1/2" x 11". The cost
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00571.html (7,830 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] "House" Method of Raising a Tilt-Over Tower (score: 1)
Author: <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 17:08:36 -0000
You have leverages to consider that will complicate matters. If your winch is mounted 30 feet higher than the swivel point and the 150 pound antenna/rotor is 120 feet from the swivel point the winch
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00750.html (10,904 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] Aircraft Cable / Safety Line (score: 1)
Author: <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 20:15:11 -0000
How much is your life worth? de Paul, W8AEF _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. C
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00102.html (8,890 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] tower mounted vertical (score: 1)
Author: <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 04:41:22 -0000
And please don't forget that elevated radials will be resonant. Gotta be cut to your desired operating frequency or they will really upset the tuning of the vertical. I would expect that at least a p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00285.html (9,318 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu