Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ogden@us.ibm.com: 87 ]

Total 87 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TowerTalk] buried conduit (score: 1)
Author: Bill Ogden <ogden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 10:27:43 -0400
On a much more basic level than some of the other replies - and for my simple, straight 40-foot run: 1. Be certain to use "sweeps" rather than "90 angle" fittings. The sweeps provide a more gentle cu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00120.html (9,067 bytes)

42. Re: [TowerTalk] buried conduit (score: 1)
Author: Bill Ogden <ogden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 14:00:40 -0400
I noticed the standing water in my previous conduit by pulling a rag through it. I then hooked up a shop vac (running in reverse) and actually blew water out the far end. The problem may have been du
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00124.html (7,781 bytes)

43. [TowerTalk] SteppIR problem (score: 1)
Author: Bill Ogden <ogden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:51:10 -0400
Simple suggestion: Ask the SteppIR people for a control-box connector with a few feet of cable on it. (That is, do not try to solder one yourself. It is difficult to do accurately without a proper ji
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00251.html (8,567 bytes)

44. [TowerTalk] SteppIR problem-update from the front lines (score: 1)
Author: Bill Ogden <ogden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:22:07 -0400
Good news on the first step. Now try connecting a good shop vacuum (hooked up in reverse, to blow air) to one end of the conduit and see what you can blow through it. It might be a considerable amoun
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00376.html (7,890 bytes)

45. [TowerTalk] SteppIR problem-update from the front lines (score: 1)
Author: Bill Ogden <ogden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 19:48:57 -0400
If it can be done without too much trouble, try adding another 100' to the control line. This should help determine if the problem is due to transmission line aspects of the control cable. Is the gro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00519.html (8,604 bytes)

46. [TowerTalk] Prelube 6 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Ogden <ogden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 09:53:34 -0400
Any suggestions where I can find Prelube 6 in local stores? (I ran out of my current can. I like to spray the cable every time I crank my tower down -- about every 6 months). Bill - W2WO ____________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00781.html (6,636 bytes)

47. [TowerTalk] Coax for crank-up TX-455 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Ogden <ogden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 13:19:09 -0400
I have the same combination: TX-455, 3-element SteppIR; also Ham-IV rotator, a terminated inverted V (a few feet below the top) and a half-sloper (at top of second section). I let the coaxes and cont
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00147.html (8,411 bytes)

48. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax for crank-up TX-455 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Ogden <ogden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 19:06:15 -0400
theory that the sliding joints and steel cables may not have the best connections. The connection reference was for good RF connections between the tower sections. This would seem to be important fo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00248.html (8,046 bytes)

49. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax for crank-up TX-455 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Ogden <ogden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 10:06:38 -0400
place with 10 or 20 mil thick pipe wrapping tape. I tape the cables to the standoff arm before they enter the sweep. I did the same when I first set it up. However, after fooling with several cable
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00274.html (8,515 bytes)

50. [TowerTalk] Crank Up towers (score: 1)
Author: Bill Ogden <ogden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 14:13:38 -0400
I have a 3el SteppIR on a UST 455 with a 10' mast -- about 6' sticking above the tower. I routinely lower the tower and crank it over without problems. (The standard winches provides good arm exercis
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00098.html (8,871 bytes)

51. [TowerTalk] elevation-angle statistical files for YT (score: 1)
Author: Bill Ogden <ogden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 14:38:14 -0400
For what its worth, I live next to a small mountain (or a big hill, depending on your reference points) that is about 15 degrees high to the west. This blocks my path to the south Pacific. I can work
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-11/msg00005.html (7,187 bytes)

52. [TowerTalk] steppIR 30/40 addon (score: 1)
Author: Bill Ogden <ogden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:46:39 -0500
I added the 34/40 option while the antenna was still on the tower, but my tower was cranked down and tilted over. The "platform" is very close to the mast area and you could reach it from the vertica
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00245.html (7,379 bytes)

53. [TowerTalk] Two questions (buried coax) (score: 1)
Author: Bill Ogden <ogden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:43:34 -0400
1. Don't even THINK of using anything less than 3" PVC (or whatever material) and 4"" is better. Three coax runs will look very lonely in a 3" or 4" pipe, but you will be happy you used a larger pipe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00468.html (7,423 bytes)

54. [TowerTalk] Two questions (buried coax) (score: 1)
Author: Bill Ogden <ogden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:46:18 -0400
FWIW, I had lots of water in a buried conduit for several months (without knowing it). Something prompted me to pull a rag through and it came out soaked. I connected a shopvac, in reverse mode, and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00491.html (7,963 bytes)

55. [TowerTalk] Alpha Delta DX-A Twin Sloper (score: 1)
Author: Bill Ogden <ogden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 12:45:34 -0400
You now have multiple responses and you can believe all of them. I have the same half-sloper connected near the top of my 55' crankup (suspended several feet from the top, to increase the distance fr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00092.html (8,323 bytes)

56. [TowerTalk] Analyzers (score: 1)
Author: Bill Ogden <ogden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 08:59:03 -0400
My experience with the Autek has not been good. The readings are simply too unstable for easy use. I believe this has been discussed many times in various places. The specs for the units are good, bu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00038.html (7,338 bytes)

57. [TowerTalk] Loop vs Dipole...I'm original "asker" (score: 1)
Author: Bill Ogden <ogden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:34:49 -0400
The interaction between various wire antennas may be more than "minor". I have a half-sloper on a tower (a two-wire version, for 160, 80, 40). The tower becomes the primary half of the antenna and sh
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00643.html (9,883 bytes)

58. [TowerTalk] Outdoor Coax Issue (score: 1)
Author: Bill Ogden <ogden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 08:29:55 -0500
For what its worth: I think almost everyone who runs cables underground eventually wishes they had used a conduit of some kind. It seems there are always control cables to be added, another feed line
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00020.html (8,258 bytes)

59. Re: [TowerTalk] Quarter Wave Sloper (half sloper) (score: 1)
Author: Bill Ogden <ogden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:48:43 -0500
I have a similar halfsloper (40/80/160) attached to a 55-foot crankup tower with a SteppIR on top, I initially attached the sloper to the top of the tower, but later moved it to the top of the middle
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00673.html (9,896 bytes)

60. [TowerTalk] A poll of Cubical Quad qwners (score: 1)
Author: Bill Ogden <ogden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 13:41:46 -0500
I had the 5-band Cubex for several years. It was an excellent receiving antenna and a good transmitting antenna. I think it was the best receiving antenna I have ever had, especially for very low-sig
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00287.html (8,263 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu