Mail Archive Search: <+from:na9d@speakeasy.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:na9d@speakeasy.net: 168 ]

Total 168 documents matching your query.

101. [Towertalk] Choices (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 07:15:18 -0500; Looks like I touched a nerve here, Bob. The facts are that from the midwest and other similar areas, our signals have to travel through the aurora belt to get to Europe. From the east coast your sign; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00348.html (10,378 bytes)
102. [Towertalk] tape flags (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 18:39:19 -0500; into place, you won't get the flag. The worst thing to do is to stretch the tape to basically tear it off the roll. I am VERY guilty of doing that and I am sure I'll have to go back some day and re-d; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00445.html (7,557 bytes)
103. [Towertalk] An idea...oh boy (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 07:27:12 -0500; Jason, A better idea for you yet: Glen Martin (www.glenmartin.com) makes some awesome roof tripods. You should be able to easily put up a roof tripod w/o any city permit. In fact, that is one where y; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00453.html (9,237 bytes)
104. [Towertalk] An idea...oh boy (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 06:49:56 -0500; Been there. Done that! Way to go! IMHO, a 40M beam would not do all that well that low. But a small beam for the upper bands would work just fine at 36 feet. Personally, I would go with the 17.5' on; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00464.html (10,306 bytes)
105. [Towertalk] Commercial 300W Amp (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 20:44:04 -0500; Jason, A couple points: 1.) The best place to ask amplifier questions on is on the Amps reflector (amps@contesting.com). 2.) If I had the money to spend on either a 300 Watt amp or an additional or b; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00508.html (8,529 bytes)
106. [Towertalk] Commercial 300W Amp (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 21:32:29 -0500; Jason, First of all, why do you think you would create interference at 600 W? All too often hams are shamed into thinking they are the problem. If you have a well put together station, the interferen; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00510.html (10,020 bytes)
107. [Towertalk] Roof mount tower questions... (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 22:57:15 -0500; Jason, No stupid questions. To answer your first question - I am not sure. It depends on how much you have up on your tower. The forces on a tower due to a particular amount of windload can be calcul; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00516.html (10,628 bytes)
108. [Towertalk] Coax recommendations (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:06:07 -0500; LMR400 falls in to the RG8 size classification and so uses the same connectors. No problem. No issue with sealing. It's a solid dielectric unlike 9913. It is suitable for direct burial. No problem th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00531.html (9,102 bytes)
109. [Towertalk] Coax recommendations (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 18:55:21 -0500; Perhaps not. They do have a direct burial version. And the Cable Experts CXP1318FX IS indeed a direct burial cable. 73, Jon NA9D -- Jon Ogden NA9D (ex: KE9NA) Life Member: ARRL, NRA Member: AMSAT, DX; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00536.html (8,391 bytes)
110. [Towertalk] Direct Burial Coax (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 21:01:01 -0500; The foil shield is not there to protect against moisture but to improve shielding and decrease loss. 73, Jon NA9D -- Jon Ogden NA9D (ex: KE9NA) Life Member: ARRL, NRA Member: AMSAT, DXCC http://www.q; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00544.html (7,378 bytes)
111. [Towertalk] Direct Burial Coax (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 21:02:46 -0500; The jacket is the key. If you have a waterproof Polyethelene jacket, then you won't have the problem. Cable Experts sells a direct burial rated RG-213 and their CXP1318FX is also rated for direct bur; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00545.html (7,583 bytes)
112. [Towertalk] Multiple Antennas on One Feed-line (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 21:05:41 -0500; You absolutely can do such a thing. You may need a duplexer or triplexer at each end depending on what you want to do and you may be power limited. Diamond and Comet both sell products that you want.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00546.html (7,626 bytes)
113. [Towertalk] Coax recommendations (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 06:36:27 -0500; The issue with this is that you will need to have some sort of "venting" of the PVC in order to allow air to get in there. Otherwise if it is sealed, then water could get in there from condensation a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00557.html (9,239 bytes)
114. [Towertalk] Repairing Fiberglass Verticals (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 23:48:42 -0500; Hi gang, Today while picking up my repaired FT-1000D at AES, I came across a couple of steals at their surplus or "honor" table. Both were antennas. One was a Cushcraft 19 element 432 Yagi (719B) tha; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00575.html (7,952 bytes)
115. [Towertalk] Soldering at the top of the tower (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 17:39:49 -0500; I solder my PL-259's all the time w/o flux. I have a very large soldering iron and it heats things up and flows the solder just dandy. 73, Jon NA9D -- Jon Ogden NA9D (ex: KE9NA) Life Member: ARRL, NR; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00668.html (8,515 bytes)
116. [Towertalk] Guys with a mast (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 17:51:15 -0500; Jason, Just go through the trouble of getting a permit or variance. You seem intent on finding a way to have a top class antenna system w/o the hassle of dealing w/the village. But you probably can d; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00670.html (9,793 bytes)
117. [Towertalk] Dacron stretching (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 09:26:48 -0500; Hey Rob, Dacron does stretch quite a bit. I would think it would eventually stop, but it might not until failure occurs. I know on some of the sail boats I've raced on that dacron sails tend to stret; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00683.html (9,047 bytes)
118. [Towertalk] LMR400 vs. RG-213 (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 20:48:19 -0500; Another list member that I was having an offline conversation with suggested that it might be informative to list members to see a comparison of LMR400 with RG-213. LMR400 exceeds RG213 in a big way; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00698.html (9,066 bytes)
119. [Towertalk] LMR400 vs. RG-213 (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 23:17:33 -0500; There seems to be a lot of disagreement on this "direct burial" thing. My RG-213 says it clearly on the jacket: "Direct Burial" No, there's no goop in there, but according to what I have been told by; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00701.html (8,327 bytes)
120. [Towertalk] LMR400 vs. RG-213 (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 06:29:47 -0500; OK. I couldn't find the specs on that. Oh that's not the half of it! I am an RF component sales rep. I sell RF connectors from a French connector company. The Europeans use yet another standard for c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00708.html (8,313 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 120
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]