Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n7xy@clearwire.net: 47 ]

Total 47 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] (no subject) Vertical Antenna Instead of Tower Decision.... (score: 1)
Author: Bob Nielsen <n7xy@clearwire.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 08:28:18 -0700
When I moved to my present location 8+ years ago, I asked myself many of the same questions. I figured I was at the point where age and health meant that tower climbing wasn't really an option and, u
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00274.html (10,443 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] Near field Far field (score: 1)
Author: Bob Nielsen <n7xy@clearwire.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 13:34:08 -0700
That is the generally-used formula. As you said it isn't an abrupt transition, but the point where the 1/r^2 and 1/r^3 terms in the field strength equations become small enough to be ignored. The rel
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00393.html (8,616 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] Near field Far field (score: 1)
Author: Bob Nielsen <n7xy@clearwire.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 17:20:06 -0700
Different yes, but if I recall correctly (it's been many years since I have worked on an antenna range) the 2D^2/lambda criterion applies to both cases and is where the deviation from a plane wave is
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00403.html (10,524 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator doctor for Ham IV (score: 1)
Author: Bob Nielsen <n7xy@clearwire.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:37:34 -0700
http://www.rotor-doc.com _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00560.html (7,854 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] "Sluggo" Ground Rod driver (score: 1)
Author: Bob Nielsen <n7xy@clearwire.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:29:34 -0700
I bought a 6 in. length of 1 in. pipe and a cap at Home Depot which has worked fine for me at a cost of less than $5.00. I figure that after a dozen or so ground rods I might have to replace the cap
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00310.html (8,593 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical with no radial wires (score: 1)
Author: Bob Nielsen <n7xy@clearwire.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 18:10:36 -0700
The Hy-Gain AV640, Cushcraft R8 (etc) and some of the Gap verticals have minimal counterpoises and if you elevate the base a bit above the roof, there shouldn't be any problems. I have used a AV640 f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00378.html (8,586 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] wire antenna question (score: 1)
Author: Bob Nielsen <n7xy@clearwire.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:12:53 -0800
Blair, If you do a Google search on "Smith Chart", you will find many resources about this useful tool to graphically display impedance and how a match can be achieved. Chapter 28 of my copy of the A
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00385.html (11,089 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] 2000 Foot Tower, Antenna Replacement (score: 1)
Author: Bob Nielsen <n7xy@clearwire.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 19:03:41 -0800
I agree. Good show (and a gin pole to end all gin poles). Bob, N7XY _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00062.html (9,564 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] Hy-Gain AV-640 (score: 1)
Author: Bob Nielsen <n7xy@clearwire.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 07:31:56 -0800
I have had a AV-640 up for the past 7 years and agree with everything Art says. That antenna is very similar (except for not having traps) to the R8 which displayed very good results in the K7LXC/N0A
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00660.html (12,453 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] Hy-Gain AV-640 (score: 1)
Author: Bob Nielsen <n7xy@clearwire.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 16:31:14 -0800
I essentially used your option #2, although I picked a shorter piece of pipe for two reasons; the ability to easily mount the antenna while standing on my roof and getting it home from the hardware s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00686.html (12,359 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] Do Your Neighbors Complain About Your Antenna? (score: 1)
Author: Bob Nielsen <n7xy@clearwire.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 08:31:43 -0800
That also wrapped on my computer. With most email programs, using left and right arrows instead of parentheses will usually work even if the line wraps: <http://www.radioarcala.com/nbspStation/Towers
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00336.html (10,227 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] Soldering Iron (score: 1)
Author: Bob Nielsen <n7xy@clearwire.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:48:17 -0800
I haven't tried it but saw something about doing that using a soldering gun with the tip removed. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Tower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00047.html (8,896 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] BELDEN 9913F7 (score: 1)
Author: Bob Nielsen <n7xy@clearwire.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:59:39 -0700
85%, see <http://www.belden.com/pdfs/03Belden_Master_Catalog/ 06Coaxial_Cables/06.67_71.pdf> Bob, N7XY _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00704.html (7,710 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1)
Author: Bob Nielsen <n7xy@clearwire.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 09:42:20 -0700
That's in the US. Some other countries have higher limits. Bob, N7XY _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00263.html (14,840 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] Hardline ? (score: 1)
Author: Bob Nielsen <n7xy@clearwire.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:29:58 -0700
True, but VSWR can introduce additional loss over and above the insertion loss experienced with a perfectly matched transmission. There's a figure in the ARRL Handbook (Figure 21.5 in the 2007 editio
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00575.html (9,376 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] HP8761A (score: 1)
Author: Bob Nielsen <n7xy@clearwire.net>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 07:37:55 -0700
You might want to reconsider. That switch is only rated to handle ten watts average power: http://www.helmut-singer.de/pdf/hp8761A_8761B.pdf 73, Bob N7XY _____________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00479.html (8,484 bytes)

37. Re: [TowerTalk] HP8761A (score: 1)
Author: Bob Nielsen <n7xy@clearwire.net>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 09:58:00 -0700
That peak rating is for very low duty factor applications, such as radar, and probably (although they don't specify it) only applies to a very short pulse. Most of the HP components like this were in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00483.html (11,578 bytes)

38. Re: [TowerTalk] HP8761A (score: 1)
Author: Bob Nielsen <n7xy@clearwire.net>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 09:35:12 -0700
Correct. They definitely weren't aimed at (or priced for!) the amateur market in any case. I used a few of these switches in the 1970s to switch between horizontal and vertical feeds in an antenna te
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00498.html (9,183 bytes)

39. Re: [TowerTalk] Power Pole (score: 1)
Author: Bob Nielsen <n7xy@clearwire.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 08:20:26 -0700
Probably creosote, also used to treat wood for docks and railroad ties. The EPA Superfund folks have been cleaning up the site of a former creosote facility a mile or so from my QTH. They have spent
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00072.html (8,400 bytes)

40. Re: [TowerTalk] Mounting 2/440 beams on tower (score: 1)
Author: Bob Nielsen <n7xy@clearwire.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 13:28:54 -0700
You probably will have issues doing that. If you could select coax lengths between the tee such that each beam which would present a very high impedance at the tee on the other band, it would probabl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00027.html (9,792 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu