Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n7mal@citlink.net: 66 ]

Total 66 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] KW-80 trap (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:51:06 -0500
Tom I have my chart right here and it says 45 or 42 feet depending on whether your using the fone or cw KW80. As a personal testimonial once you get it working you'll never go back to sex,,,hihihi...
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00417.html (7,653 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Collapsible Masts (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:52:54 -0500
http://www.tessco.com/products/displayProductInfo.do?sku=33236&eventPage=2 MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD CITY, AZ http://www.n7mal.com Everyone in the world is entitled to be burdened by my opinion Fellow talke
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00208.html (7,881 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] CCR's -- Am I being too paranoid? (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:11:14 -0500
Robert I have included a link to a news story which you might find interesting. I have lived here in Mohave County for 15 years and have never heard of any problems involving ham-radio towers/antenna
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00396.html (11,395 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] KFI tower update (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 20:11:16 -0500
What happened to the KFI tower updates. I understand, and am well aware of, the disaster/mess that happened. There is a lot of info at http://www.k6rix.com/ 73 MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD CITY, AZ http://www.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00000.html (6,770 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical plans (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2008 13:16:38 -0500
Bill when you're bragging about how good your antenna is you probably should, at the very least, know who makes your antenna..... :-) 73 MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD CITY, AZ http://www.n7mal.com Everyone in t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00096.html (9,994 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] ATR-20 vs AT1KP (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 01:07:44 -0500
This is a 'no-brainor'.... Who is Ameritron's parent company..... I have never heard a bad report, on the air, about any Palstar product. The only tuner I've ever heard more praise for is the 'ole-re
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00144.html (9,227 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] ATR-20 vs AT1KP (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 02:07:26 -0500
RE: "In the interest of perspective," Here are just a couple of links. I could fill up an entire page with these kinds of links: http://forums.qrz.com/archive/index.php/t-90206.html http://lists.cont
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00147.html (9,470 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] The Vertical and the Balun (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 02:03:56 -0500
Jerry I have a real problem with some of these explanations. Unfortunately I know just enough about antenna stuff to be dangerous. The purpose of a balun is to transform an unbalanced something to a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00279.html (11,782 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] broken tower section (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 19:39:33 -0500
Joe my answer is going to sound like a smart-a but I'm very serious. First a compromised tower is compromised forever. It will eventually cause more damage than if you replaced it today. There is a v
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00112.html (8,703 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] FIRST TOWER UP AND LOOKING GORGEOUS (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 20:06:31 -0500
Congrats Bob: In my 50 years at this hobby I've had a lot of towers at various locations. I have a personal hard fast rule about guys. They must do something other than guy. I make some type of wire
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00215.html (11,896 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Guying Material and resonance (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:45:29 -0500
I have put up a lot of rohn 25 because I have a lot of faith in it. I have found the specs on rohn 35 are under rated. Rohn 25 will handle a lot. BUT I'm not even 'gutsy' enough to try what you are g
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00245.html (8,894 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Trapped in antenna trap confusion (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:52:41 -0500
Bill here is what I've used for many years very/extremely successfully and more important why..... I've used the reyco traps. The keyword is traps. They really are traps, not dipole shorteners like t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00392.html (13,192 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Trapped in antenna trap confusion (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:49:16 -0500
Mr. JH I must first congratulate you: You are the first person ever to use me and "design paradigm" in the same context. No I don't use anything to try to suppress feedline radiation with a dipole. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00398.html (10,350 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Delta Loop compared to Dipole (actual experience) (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:26:58 -0500
My lot is slightly smaller than yours is. I have a full sized 80 meter loop, 85 feet on a side. It is fed at the top with open wire 'real' 600 ohm line into the tuner in the shack. It is fed at the t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00525.html (10,123 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Pre-Installation Tuning of Cushcraft TEN-3 Yagi (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 19:53:55 -0500
Follow the directions..... MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD CITY, AZ http://www.n7mal.com Everyone in the world is entitled to be burdened by my opinion I am in the process of checking SWR prior to installation of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00094.html (8,527 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] Old coax (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 19:51:09 -0500
Makes really good, and efficient, radial wire and/or grounding braid..... 73 MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD CITY, AZ http://www.n7mal.com Everyone in the world is entitled to be burdened by my opinion I have a r
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00155.html (8,212 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Electronic Dog Containment Fence Noisy? (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 23:49:42 -0500
Ken contact the world famous W6OBB. He is going through it right now and I've heard him commenting about it on the air. I can't help you with details because it would be second hand. 73 MAL N7MAL BUL
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00287.html (8,723 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] 2 HAMS died in Kansas City (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:47:37 -0500
Whoa time out Bill: I have had 2 antenna accidents in my 50 years. Both were caused by carelessness on my part. I got lucky, I should either be dead or at least totally handicapped. These 2 guys just
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00361.html (9,025 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] tower restrictions (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:24:26 -0800
I live in a community where the city gov't officials are not able to walk and chew gum at the same time. There are many hams here who have towers etc who, like me, have never been hassled by anyone f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00476.html (9,360 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] toroidal BALUNS (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:42:40 -0800
Bob how dare you ask a technical question on this mailing list. Do you not realize this is a mailing list to run down W9KNI, or advertise picnics, or basic reading on an ancient airplane radio, or ev
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00663.html (8,904 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu