Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n6kj.kelly@gmail.com: 123 ]

Total 123 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TowerTalk] More possible RCS8V problems (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 10:37:25 -0800
I must have a loose connection somewhere. I'm not sure if it is in the switch or not. I've had no problem for a couple of days now. I'm beginning to distrust the RCS8-V though. Maybe I should conside
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00118.html (10,914 bytes)

62. Re: [TowerTalk] More possible RCS8V problems (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 13:17:31 -0800
Good question. For my current problem (or should I say, the problem I was seeing over the weekend but no longer) this would be a more plausible explanation since the symptom now affects all antenna i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00125.html (9,868 bytes)

63. Re: [TowerTalk] More possible RCS8V problems (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 21:14:29 -0800
Yep. It looks like it is either a bad SO-239 jack on my FT-857D (which I've been using for the past 2 weeks while my FT-1000MP is being repaired) OR a loose ground connection on my PL-259. The RCS-8V
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00137.html (11,579 bytes)

64. [TowerTalk] QRN during the rain (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:29:45 -0800
I live near overhead HV powerlines as well as overhead MV powerlines. The nearest ones are the MV powerlines which terminate at the corner of my lot about 70 or 80 feet from my tower. I get very stro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00337.html (7,276 bytes)

65. Re: [TowerTalk] multiple beams (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:52:23 -0800
Or consider purchasing one of the 40m yagi's which is designed to be a bit more closely spaced. My Optibeam OB2-40 is only about 8 feet above my SteppIR and it works ok. There is a little interaction
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00376.html (8,033 bytes)

66. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna/Tower Grounding (Lightning Protection) (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 13:44:33 -0800
Is there any way to tell when the ICE or Polyphaser arrestors need to be replaced due to taking too many lightning hits? Any way to tell if/when your tower has taken a hit? __________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00191.html (8,790 bytes)

67. [TowerTalk] Escondido Tower? (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:16:16 -0800
When I was a young ham in the 70's I remember seeing a picture of a big ham tower in Escondido, CA. in QST or CQ. That was my dream antenna back then. Who was the owner of that tower? Is that ham sti
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00631.html (7,064 bytes)

68. [TowerTalk] Escondido Tower (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:11:43 -0800
I've been asked to share the answer to this "trivia question" with the list. I didn't think it deserved TT bandwidth, but apparently inquiring minds want to know. It appears that the answer is: K6JL
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00634.html (6,962 bytes)

69. Re: [TowerTalk] Which rotor for a tree setup - Ham 3, Ham 4 , other (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:53:41 -0800
Trees are unregulated? Don't be so sure. The zoning ordinance for Gilroy, Ca. specifically forbids attaching antennas to trees or utility poles!!!! _______________________________________________ ___
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00235.html (9,266 bytes)

70. Re: [TowerTalk] Which rotor for a tree setup - Ham 3, Ham 4 , other (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:19:34 -0800
Well, this ordinance is just like all the rest: you can do what you want until somebody complains. I'm sure nobody will complain about a dipole tied to a tree, but a SteppIR on top of a 70ft. tree in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00243.html (9,618 bytes)

71. [TowerTalk] Whole House Surge Protectors (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:29:51 -0700
Can anyone recommend a high quality whole house surge/lightning suppressor? _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list Towe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00199.html (6,402 bytes)

72. [TowerTalk] Controllable Coax Switch (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:15:06 -0700
I want to replace my RCS-8V remote switch. I need to be able to switch 4 HF antennas. I don't need a remote switch, but would like a switch that can be controlled automatically. SO2R capable would be
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00616.html (6,755 bytes)

73. Re: [TowerTalk] Got a tower/antenna in a CC&R subdivision? (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 08:14:59 -0700
Go to the county tax assessors office and ask them to tell you if they have ever reduced the assessment of a property when an amateur radio antenna was installed next door (or nearby). Also, it isn't
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00319.html (12,573 bytes)

74. Re: [TowerTalk] Got a tower/antenna in a CC&R subdivision? (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 08:55:51 -0700
How can a loss in property value be calculated and how can it be proven to be caused by a ham antenna? House values fluctuate greatly in most active home markets. They can vary by +/-5% in a month. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00333.html (11,218 bytes)

75. Re: [TowerTalk] Got a tower/antenna in a CC&R subdivision? (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 09:05:38 -0700
Oh no...a shed!!! Oh no, an RV! We don't want any white trash in our pristine neighborhood! I lived in a Townhouse 10 years ago when they were forced to finally allow 30" satellite dishes. Did the ne
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00336.html (12,687 bytes)

76. Re: [TowerTalk] Got a tower/antenna in a CC&R subdivision? (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 10:23:50 -0700
I'm still waiting for someone to show me a new housing development that does not have an antenna restricting CC&R and/or HOA, esp. here in the California Bay Area. Nobody has shown me one yet. For an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00345.html (13,742 bytes)

77. Re: [TowerTalk] Got a tower/antenna in a CC&R subdivision? (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 15:43:59 -0700
Because in many metropolitan areas (esp. in California) it is nearly impossible (if not impossible) to find a home built in the last 20 years that is NOT covered by a CC&R or HOA. Many of us have car
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00363.html (12,267 bytes)

78. Re: [TowerTalk] Got a tower/antenna in a CC&R subdivision? (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 12:27:49 -0700
The concept of CC&Rs goes way back to medieval England according to the following website: http://www.thehoaprimer.org/ccrs.htm My previous house, built in 1939, had CC&Rs that prohibited outhouses,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00409.html (10,942 bytes)

79. [TowerTalk] U-bolt swivel? (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:50:53 -0700
I have a 2 element 40m yagi about 8 feet above the thrust bearing of my crankup tower. Working on the elements or feed is a real problem because they are 8 feet away from the mast. Right now, the onl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00274.html (7,351 bytes)

80. Re: [TowerTalk] U-bolt swivel (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:44:51 -0700
I can picture this in my mind, but isn't that a lot of stress to put on the u-bolt and mast since you now have the entire weight of the antenna pulling down on the "boom section" with no counter-weig
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00287.html (8,775 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu