Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n4zr@contesting.com: 1902 ]

Total 1902 documents matching your query.

341. [TowerTalk] W2DU Balun's? (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 17:23:59 -0500
Interesting -- I'd assumed Rich was referring to the W2DU bead choke type. I know they have some reported deficiencies at low frequency due to uneven heat distribution along the string of beads, but
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00096.html (8,809 bytes)

342. [TowerTalk] Antenna Heights and EZNEC (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 22:48:14 -0500
Tom, I think you're getting the horizontal and vertical polarization cases mixed, with maybe also a little too much focus on the 160m case. In his book, Dave Leeson observes that ground characteristi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00112.html (11,391 bytes)

343. [TowerTalk] Modeling -- correction (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 10:30:33 -0500
73, Pete N4ZR Sometimes a tower is just a tower ________________________________________________________________________ Where do you get ICE bandpass filters & beverage matching boxes? The same plac
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00122.html (7,311 bytes)

344. [TowerTalk] Stealth painting Butternut vertical (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 17:14:17 -0500
I just acquired a Butternut HF9V, and would like to give it the stealth treatment. It has large aluminum wire inductors for loading on 80 and 40. As long as I maintain electrical continuity, would a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00132.html (7,270 bytes)

345. [TowerTalk] Antenna Heights and EZNEC (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 21:31:39 -0500
I don't think you read my whole message. Modeling with NEC has been used to compute the effect of aircraft carrier superstructure in the vicinity of antennas, so I don't think what you describe is ou
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00144.html (9,978 bytes)

346. [TowerTalk] RE: Open question - response (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 21:40:44 -0500
Mel, it doesn't make physical sense. That could be April Fools, or it could be 73, but it ain't real. And I don't work for NSA. 73, Pete N4ZR Sometimes a tower is just a tower _______________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00145.html (7,339 bytes)

347. [TowerTalk] W2DU Balun's? (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2002 08:36:44 -0500
baluns. I do the same. At least at CW/SSB duty cycles, they have held up very well at ~ 1300 watts on 80m. I'm not 100 percent sure there's enough inductance for 160 meters. For those who don't want
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00161.html (9,901 bytes)

348. [TowerTalk] 1/4 wave 160 (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2002 22:15:09 -0500
Until you try to model the shunt feed attached to a cylindrical model of the tower. Then the unequal diameters connected at an acute angle give wildly improbable results. Thanks to K6SE for straighte
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00188.html (8,456 bytes)

349. [TowerTalk] Bead baluns (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 08:25:02 -0500
I have had very good luck using the Budwig RF-1 dipole center insulators in my 80m array, with 50 #73 beads over Teflon coax and PL-259s on each end. I use big black plastic tiewraps, looped over the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00241.html (7,739 bytes)

350. [TowerTalk] Shunt Feed Capacitor for Tower (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 08:52:34 -0500
Because my antennas were already up, I elected to try low power and leave the elements ungrounded. At 200w, so far so good. I am wondering, though -- if and when I go to high power, should I expect t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00242.html (10,746 bytes)

351. [TowerTalk] Shunt Feed Capacitor for Tower (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 09:24:35 -0500
Sorry, I wasn't thinking clearly. That makes perfect sense. I must have crossed the two ideas from your earlier post. Just for fun, I ran my whole-tower model with a zero-current source at the juncti
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00274.html (10,205 bytes)

352. [TowerTalk] Shunt Feed PS (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 10:24:48 -0500
Just a footnote -- I ran the same model with 2000 watts input, and the model showd ~1250 volts across the 40m yagi insulator. Intuitively, enough to be concerned about, particularly if the insulator
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00277.html (7,056 bytes)

353. [TowerTalk] Shunt Feed Capacitor for Tower (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 13:30:44 -0500
I'm a little leery of serendipitous resonances and unexpected interaction that could result if you short elements and boom together. Wouldn't it make better sense to connect a small inductor between
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00281.html (10,296 bytes)

354. [TowerTalk] Shunt Feed Capacitor for Tower (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 15:41:16 -0500
I believe they have said that this is a possibility, since it should not affect the operation of the antenna on its design frequency. Given the high voltages present, I assume that a vacuum latching
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00284.html (10,224 bytes)

355. [TowerTalk] (the) Actual Capacitor for Shunt-Fed Tower (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 21:34:14 -0500
The first time out, though, these caps are awkward, because they are hard to adjust. 73, Pete N4ZR Sometimes a tower is just a tower __________________________________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00301.html (8,712 bytes)

356. [TowerTalk] Climbing Belt Recommendations (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2002 23:32:15 -0500
My Klein harness/belt is two separate systems, interconnected at the waist belt. The waist belt could function by itself with the positioning lanyard should the full-body harness fail, and the fall-a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00324.html (9,377 bytes)

357. [TowerTalk] Climbing Belt Recommendations (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 08:09:11 -0500
A lot of people may disagree, but I always use both my fall arrest lanyard (the one that attaches to the harness in the middle of my back) and my positioning lanyard. When climbing, I hook the positi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00327.html (9,190 bytes)

358. [TowerTalk] Cheap control cable (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 10:02:51 -0500
I notice that Digi-Key is selling CAT-3 network cable for $72/1000ft. It has 8 #24 conductors, which suggests that at least for my run (~200 ft.), it can be used with TopTen relay boxes with minimal
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00329.html (7,542 bytes)

359. [TowerTalk] Climbing Belt Recommendations (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 02:48:35 -0500
I normally wear leather gloves on the tower, particularly while climbing, and have not found the OSHA clips on the Klein fall-arrest lanyard to be hard to manipulate. In fact, they have something clo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00356.html (9,660 bytes)

360. [TowerTalk] Tower Climbing Safety (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 10:01:14 -0500
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Wait a sec -- the physics don't compute. If you have the fall arrest lanyard hooked above your head somewhere, you will only fall a couple of feet before it takes up th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00407.html (9,200 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu