Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n4zr@contesting.com: 1902 ]

Total 1902 documents matching your query.

321. [Towertalk] stacked LPDA's (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 01:32:58 -0500
stack, I think Tennadyne's analysis misses several points. Most important is the beneficial broadening of the first vertical lobe in the stack, which makes a big difference when you compute the avera
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00516.html (8,878 bytes)

322. [Towertalk] 75 ohm CATV hardline/weathering (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 12:58:24 -0500
I have a shot at several reels of 75-ohm unjacketed 3/4" aluminum hardline that are surplus to the needs of the local cable company. The only thing that seriously concerns me is that they have been s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00531.html (7,172 bytes)

323. [Towertalk] CATV (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 17:08:24 -0500
Too many people responded for me to list them all. Thanks for the encouragement. It looks like they may have over 1000 feet total that is just sitting there, waiting to be sold as scrap. Now on to th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00534.html (6,497 bytes)

324. [Towertalk] CATV hardline cost (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 20:31:40 -0500
Thanks again to everyone who responded. The consensus was that I should ask them to pay ME, if I take the spools away. I'd just as soon avoid that, but we'll see. Thanks, everybody. 73, Pete N4ZR Che
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00537.html (6,413 bytes)

325. [Towertalk] 75 ohm CATV hardline/weathering (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 07:45:43 -0500
Basically, everyone said that you can just trim back a little and go with it. K1VR suggested 1 foot per year stored outside, while others said just to look at the end and trim till everything looks c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00541.html (7,739 bytes)

326. [Towertalk] limitations of stacking (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 09:51:56 -0500
Is there a theoretical reason why the gain resulting from stacking two HF yagis over real ground is limited to 3 dB? I have a model of two C-3Es that shows 3.5 dB increase over a single C-3E in the t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00547.html (7,820 bytes)

327. [Towertalk] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 17:28:48 -0500
Another possible option would be a Bobcat -- I think the scoops on them take about a yard at a time. When I was doing this a few years ago, a lot of people warned against the Georgia buggie because o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00636.html (9,391 bytes)

328. [Towertalk] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 16:17:58 -0500
I think they come in several different sizes, but it's been long enough that I remember only my aching back and what seemed like only one Bobcat trip per guy anchor -- I was the guy with the shovel o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00695.html (8,585 bytes)

329. [Towertalk] Force 12 antennas and tower relay grounding (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 16:21:50 -0500
73, Pete N4ZR Check out the World HF Contest Station Database at www.pvrc.org
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00696.html (8,142 bytes)

330. [Towertalk] Detuned Mosley CL-36-M (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 16:39:06 -0500
I once took apart a Classic 36 that had destroyed itself during a microburst on an office building roof in Washington, DC (agency concealed to protect the guilty). As I recall, it had an odd feed sys
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00699.html (7,645 bytes)

331. [Towertalk] Jo-Gunn Antenna Stack (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 17:18:01 -0500
Only if you drive them with a tube amp using Type 20s and feed them with some of that mega-super speaker wire. Oh, and don't forget, no terminal strips allowed in any equipment you build!!! 73, Pete
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00702.html (8,312 bytes)

332. [Towertalk] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 15:52:59 -0500
I've been using YT for years. Recently, I upgraded my terrain profile to Europe to one with much higher accuracy than before. The profile is essentially flat within about 50 feet out to 2 miles, but
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00762.html (9,161 bytes)

333. [TowerTalk] Everything Works QST Article by N6BT (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 03:07:17 -0500
Actually, I think Tom's getting a bum rap on this one. As I read the article it only has a couple of messages: Antennas are fun. You can have a lot of fun with a minimal antenna, but you'll have more
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00010.html (9,318 bytes)

334. [TowerTalk] Super high antennas on 10 to 20 (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 07:53:37 -0500
A lot higher than 4-6 wavelengths. I ran a 10m yagi in EZNEC at 200 feet above ground, and both the deep nulls and reflection gain were still fully evident. 73, Pete N4ZR Sometimes a tower is just a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00057.html (9,048 bytes)

335. [TowerTalk] High Antenna Modelling (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 09:24:48 -0500
Sorry, but I don't agree. This modeling software (NEC-2) would be of no use at all if it hadn't been extensively verified against the real-world situations that it was developed to model. There are k
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00060.html (9,469 bytes)

336. [TowerTalk] vertical antenna siting -- over steel roof or ground mounted (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 10:52:15 -0500
I'm considering installing a trap vertical (HF-9V) for 80-10 meters. I have two possible locations for it. One is in the center of a 30 x 40 foot steel building roof, about 10 feet off the ground (an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00064.html (8,035 bytes)

337. [TowerTalk] High Antenna Modelling (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 10:45:54 -0500
As Tom's explanation of null formation suggests, some foreground slope angles and distances from the antenna may actually deepen a given null or nulls. I think there is probably another phenomenon at
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00065.html (9,189 bytes)

338. [TowerTalk] Antenna Heights and EZNEC (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 10:55:59 -0500
VARIABLES EZNEC uses the NEC-2 engine, which was developed for the US Government, at great expense, and is the best thing currently available short of NEC-4, which is very expensive to end users, eve
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00067.html (8,895 bytes)

339. [TowerTalk] High Antenna Modelling (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 11:02:53 -0500
Again, I disagree. For a flat, smooth foreground, the change in the real radiation pattern IS smooth and predictable. Then you put the same antenna over an irregular foreground, and of course the res
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00068.html (9,499 bytes)

340. [TowerTalk] Antenna Heights and EZNEC (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 09:58:59 -0500
I think you are. The US Government spent a lot of money doing tests to verify that NEC-2 and 4 represented good approximations of the real world. The situations in which this approximation breaks dow
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00087.html (9,888 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu