Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n4zr@contesting.com: 1902 ]

Total 1902 documents matching your query.

221. [Towertalk] Re: Coax Opinions (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 07:52:06 -0400
For whatever it's worth, I measured the loss in my main run of CATV hardline right after it was installed, as well as the SWRS of the various antennas connected to it with pigtails of flexible coax.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00238.html (7,388 bytes)

222. [Towertalk] Took a hit Sunday--what to do? (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 14:16:28 -0400
More than likely the hit to your mast caused induced voltages of a few hundred volts on your nearby AC service, particularly if it is above ground. Most power companies can now provide a whole-house
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00253.html (7,553 bytes)

223. [Towertalk] cable TV hardline (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 09:38:07 -0400
I am using a single half-wave of CATV at 1750 KHz (about 210 feet), measured at 28000 KHz, and find that it gives me acceptable SWRs (2:1 or less) at the shack end on all bands, including on 10M. I m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00321.html (8,994 bytes)

224. [Towertalk] Crank Up Tower on Roof of a RV (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:26:40 -0400
Strikes me that the Force 12 low profile towers are another possibility. I believe they make one that is no more than about 8 feet tall when nested. 73, Pete N4ZR
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00371.html (6,710 bytes)

225. [Towertalk] Amertitron RCS8V Remote antenna switch (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 21:21:19 -0400
A point I don't think anyone has yet made this time is that there may be circumstances in a given configuration of antennas on the tower where either a shorted or an open configuration may be desirab
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00400.html (8,867 bytes)

226. [Towertalk] Mounting fixed antennas (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 17:34:35 -0400
Yes, but this also has the effect of concentrating any loads contributed by the fixed yagi on one leg of the tower, which doesn't strike me as a very good idea. I can't do the math to analyze how muc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00432.html (7,767 bytes)

227. Fragmentation (was: Re: [Towertalk] Magnetic Loop Efficiency) (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 10:50:43 -0400
Not picking on Rich (I don't know whether he is "pro" or "con" on this), but I hope this idea won't make any headway. Fragmentation of this list into separate special interest groups would lose the p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00600.html (7,375 bytes)

228. [Towertalk] Create RC5B-3 mast clamps (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 21:02:12 -0400
I'm not familiar with the Create clamps, but in the case of the Yaesu rotators a lot of the problem arose from people's not understanding how to tighten them properly. If you tighten the clamps on a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00691.html (9,837 bytes)

229. [Towertalk] GP on a tin roof - a cautionary tale (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 07:52:11 -0400
I just installed a Butternut HF9V on the galvanized steel roof of my garage, using the roof in place of radials. Just a couple of things I thought people might find worth knowing: -- I could not use
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00695.html (7,600 bytes)

230. [Towertalk] Tower Buidling 201 (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 08:02:18 -0400
Do you really mean "HF?" I think it will prove unsatisfactory, being that close to a grounded tower. When you say you were "told", do you mean that you got this information from the Rohn catalogue? I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00767.html (9,241 bytes)

231. [Towertalk] Stripping paint from Rohn 45 (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 20:59:41 -0400
I used a pressure washer, professional (rental) power. Worked fine, but I'm still finding big flakes of orange paint in my gravel driveway 5 years later! 73, Pete N4ZR Sometimes a tower is just a tow
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00791.html (7,939 bytes)

232. [Towertalk] Re: Stripping paint from Rohn 45 (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 07:38:39 -0400
That was certainly my experience. Anything the pressure washer wouldn't remove, I just painted over. Where it went down to the bare galvanizing, I used a primer specifically formulated for galvanized
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00796.html (7,126 bytes)

233. [Towertalk] verticals was: F12 C4S (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 11:53:42 -0400
Not to mention the ~6 dB of ground reflection gain, though I grant you it is apt to be at a pretty high takeoff angle unless the dipole is quite high. Still, the lower half of the first lobe can exte
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00193.html (8,051 bytes)

234. [Towertalk] 40M Dipoles (Was: Need EZNEC model 402CD..) (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 20:11:52 -0400
I believe that most models - certainly prop models like VOACAP -- specify that they are not accurate below 2 MHz. I suspect the same is true for NEC-2 and 4. Does anyone know for sure? 73, Pete N4ZR
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00244.html (8,306 bytes)

235. [Towertalk] Models and real world (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:03:17 -0400
This is certainly true, but there is another good reason, and that is that the sheer magnitude of the task required to accurately measure a phenomenon is impractical. I remember that back in the 60's
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00268.html (9,316 bytes)

236. [Towertalk] Models and real world (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:12:27 -0400
Oops, I meant to say +/- 1 dB, for consistency with Tom's example. 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the World HF Contest Station Database at www.pvrc.org
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00269.html (8,061 bytes)

237. [Towertalk] Models and real world --oops (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:26:59 -0400
For some reason, the reflector strips out the mathematical symbols for plus or minus. That's what I meant, "plus or minus 1 dB." 73, Pete N4ZR _______________________________________________ Self Sup
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00272.html (8,152 bytes)

238. [Towertalk] modeling versus measurement continued (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:14:53 -0400
In some instances, such monitoring involves medium-wave signals that are below the accurate frequency range of VOACAP, but the majority of monitoring appears to be in the SW range. The International
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00276.html (7,262 bytes)

239. [Towertalk] Models and real world --oops (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:43:30 -0400
Tom, I don't disagree with your point at all. The ONLY thing I was trying to point out is that modeling is one useful tool, among many, that learning how to do it better is worthwhile, and that knowi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00290.html (8,647 bytes)

240. [Towertalk] Re: [Amps] Mica Capacitors (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 14:50:32 -0400
At 12:23 PM 7/14/02 -0400, Tom Rauch wrote on the Amps reflector: Conversely, would I be safe in assuming that the EIA Class 2 3000V-rated disk ceramics in, for example, Mouser's catalogue (10% Y5P t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00395.html (7,123 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu