Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n4zr@comcast.net: 72 ]

Total 72 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] City attempts to shut down ham radio .... !! (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:33:22 -0400
This guy again? He must think we've forgotten the last round. 73, Pete N4ZR _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list Towe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00114.html (8,108 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Mast size (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 06:21:23 -0400
Ah I see - I have a 25AG3, which has 2 1/4" OD and a 14 gauge wall. A 2" Rohn mast fits easily inside it. If you really have a 25AG (no suffix) then our catalogs agree. Did you get it new? I remember
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00310.html (10,494 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] World's toughest fixes - 2000' tower (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:06:34 -0400
My brother-in-law used to have an office on the 85th floor of the Sears Tower. When the wind blew - it seems to do that often in Chicago - his pictures would lean out from the wall. Regarding the guy
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00349.html (15,023 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Update on ham radio confiscation in Palmdale (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 05:47:02 -0400
Do you have current accurate information, Bill? I just googled and could not find anything since February. 73, Pete N4ZR New Articles Daily - the Contesting Compendium at http://wiki.contesting.com T
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-07/msg00364.html (8,601 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Attachments was: Re: The Antenna System (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 08:46:40 -0400
The blocking of attachments such as graphics with messages was originally based on concern that they might be vehicles for viruses, as well as the bandwidth implications of large attachments. The imp
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00439.html (11,958 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Dipole center insulator strain releif (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 08:54:08 -0400
I'm a little uncomfortable with the very small bend radius of the coax in that setup. With foam-insulated coax that could risk a short from the center conductor to the shield. 73, Pete N4ZR _________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00440.html (11,037 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in Frequency As Antenna Height Rises (score: 1)
Author: Pete <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 16:17:16 -0400
There is a better way for at least some F12 40m yagis. My EF240S has two identical linear loaded dipoles, and I had tried the part-height tuning without success Finally, I put it up at full height an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00042.html (11,275 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Strange behavior (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 12:41:47 -0500
This happens all the timeon 10, and I would presume on 15 as well. Particularly in low sunspot years, I've heard and worked Europeans on 10 at 90-95 degrees just before a real band opening. K3ZO has
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-01/msg00392.html (13,342 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Active vertical and grounding (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 09:43:18 -0500
I am using an active 8-foot vertical elevated at the base about 25 feet (on a roof edge) for receive-only (RBN). Would the antenna be more sensitive ifI directly grounded the case (and coax shield) t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00232.html (7,124 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Towertalk as a No Politics zone (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 09:50:21 -0500
Can we please declare (or reiterate, in case I missed it) that Towertalk is a no-politics zone? -- 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now spotting RTTY
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00283.html (7,354 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] One wire antenna 80-10 meters? (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 22:56:44 -0400
I'm sure this question has been asked before, probably on this reflector, but so far I've found that the level of knowledge seems to increase with time. So... If you could have one horizontal single-
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-04/msg00154.html (7,314 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] A dumb question (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2017 21:28:45 -0400
After all this time I'm contemplating my first direct buried run of coax.  Hence this qwuestion - how deep is deep enough?  DoI need to get below the frost line? -- 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Revers
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-08/msg00283.html (7,246 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: F-12 Linear Loading Wire (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 07:53:16 -0400
My EF-240S with the original Alumoweld loading was up for almost 20 years, and never had any trouble with the loading wires. I did not take any special steps to prevent breaking, and they came down l
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00472.html (9,994 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] Guy anchors for AB-577 (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 15:18:55 -0500
After spending a frustrating afternoon trying (and failing) to drive a single helical guy anchor for my AB-577 tower, I'm looking for a better solution. I'm trying very hard to avoid excavation, conc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-02/msg00238.html (8,002 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Guy anchors for AB-577 (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 22:43:48 -0500
The next size down is what I've been looking at, called Duckbill Anchors  3000 lb working load, 7700 lb breaking load.  To be sure, not so fierce as the Manta Ray anchors, but don't require construct
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-02/msg00249.html (13,650 bytes)

16. [TowerTalk] Good Fastener Practice (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 21:57:49 -0500
I am in the process of reassembling an old F12 C3E, and noticed that there were no washers with it.  Somewhere I think I recall reading that when you use split lock washers, for example with U-bolts
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-02/msg00265.html (7,510 bytes)

17. [TowerTalk] Orphan VFD sensor box needed (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 06:56:24 -0400
Does anyone have the coupler part of a VFD power meter (Radio Applications, Inc., late 90s) without the indicator unit? I seem to have lost my coupler in the process of moving to Maryland, and now th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-05/msg00012.html (7,029 bytes)

18. [TowerTalk] Recommendation for Fiberglass telescoping pole (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 07:54:00 -0400
I need a ~25-foot telescoping fiberglass pole for a K9AY loop.  A lot of the poles advertised on the internet seem to be quite fragile, particularly in the top section.  Any recommendations for somet
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-06/msg00139.html (6,908 bytes)

19. [TowerTalk] Length of Inverted-L. (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 11:11:39 -0400
What to do when two respected references differ?  ON4UN's book assumes an Inverted-L is always a quarter wave ~135 feet), while the ARRL Antenna Book assumes 165-170 feet.  ON4UN mentions longer ante
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-10/msg00007.html (7,068 bytes)

20. [TowerTalk] Feeding a "Super Sloper" (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 11:48:31 -0400
(You can skip to the next-to-last paragraph if you wish; it's where the question comes in) I'm experimenting with a 40M antenna built by W1LWH, based on W7WKB's article in December 1995 QST.  It invo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-10/msg00078.html (8,484 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu