Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n4gi@tampabay.rr.com: 121 ]

Total 121 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TowerTalk] non conductive sealant (score: 1)
Author: "Blake Meinecke" <n4gi@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 12:43:44 -0400
I use platidip liquid electrical tape as a final barrier. They claim it insulates to over 10,000 volts/mil., whatever that means. It seems way more resistant to UV than scotchkote and doesn't peel of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00034.html (10,492 bytes)

62. Re: [TowerTalk] Three Fixed Tri-Band Beams on One Tower? (score: 1)
Author: "Blake M." <n4gi@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 21:39:18 -0400
Better check the load rating of 25G. All of FL is rated at 110mph (as we all know now). Throw the traps in the can and make 3 monobanders out of the Al? 73, Blake N4GI -- Original Message -- From: "d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00165.html (10,090 bytes)

63. Re: [TowerTalk] Three Fixed Tri-Band Beams on One Tower? (score: 1)
Author: "Blake M." <n4gi@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 08:56:08 -0400
No, it's 115. http://www.championradio.com/windspeed.php?abv=FL&county=Broward I put 110 since my Rohn book doesn't go any higher. 73, Blake N4GI -- Original Message -- From: "Todd Coulter" <coulter@
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00174.html (12,995 bytes)

64. Re: RE: [TowerTalk] Wireless internet antenna on ham tower (score: 1)
Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 12:28:14 -0500
-- Original Message -- Are they using stuff on your tower to connect other users and make a profit? Better make sure you won't need to have (a portion of) your property rezoned for commercial communi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00181.html (8,369 bytes)

65. Re: [TowerTalk] (another)Problem That Needs Ideas (score: 1)
Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 08:06:15 -0500
Don't have an RCS8V, but it reminds me of a problem I occasionally have with a sixpack switch... One or two of the ports on one side are intermittent unless I click the brake of my ham rotor 50 feet
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00173.html (8,876 bytes)

66. Re: [TowerTalk] Safety belts. Was: 60th Birthday (score: 1)
Author: "Blake Meinecke" <n4gi@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:08:37 -0500
http://www.elkriver.com/eagle.htm I use the "Tower LX" model. I found it to be the best combo of comfortability, cost and functionality for me. If you able to go to a rigging store and try them on, I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00034.html (10,300 bytes)

67. Re: RE: [TowerTalk] C-4E (score: 1)
Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:04:02 -0500
Be careful if you remove rivets from the 40m element, though. I don't remember which sections, but part of the center portion is triple walled and it's a PITA to re-align the three holes after-the-fa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00165.html (9,951 bytes)

68. [TowerTalk] Hamlaw list...? (score: 1)
Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:39:23 -0500
I've tried several subscription addresses in the TT archives (1997 to 2003), and one from a PVRC page, all are NG. What's the current working subscription address? hamlaw.net does yield plenty of lin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01097.html (6,836 bytes)

69. Re: [TowerTalk] ground and conductivity (score: 1)
Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:28:56 -0500
No. In college, a group of us put a 600+ foot beverage (mostly) over the corner of a large lake for a 160 contest. It was a huge PITA, and it didn't hear as good as one next to it on the dirt. Roost
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00643.html (8,969 bytes)

70. Re: [TowerTalk] 90' Rohn 45G question (score: 1)
Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 15:25:04 -0500
http://www.radiancorp.com/ROHNNET/rohnnet2001/catalog/pdfs/45G/45G-9.pdf 73, Blake N4GI _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "W
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00494.html (9,143 bytes)

71. Re: [TowerTalk] Porqupines (score: 1)
Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:07:25 -0500
The "porcupine" manufacturer has some great connections in agriculture and the DOT? 73, Blake N4GI _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00562.html (8,947 bytes)

72. Re: [TowerTalk] polyrod (score: 1)
Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 17:53:35 -0400
Count me in if there's enough interest for a southeastern order. 73, Blake N4GI _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00230.html (7,891 bytes)

73. [TowerTalk] Rohn concrete anchors: (score: 1)
Author: "Blake M." <n4gi@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 20:42:02 -0400
I'm getting ready to put rebar together for concrete anchors for a 45G tower. Rohn's concrete anchor data page says to "install reinforcing bars each way both faces" with arrows pointing to the top o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00576.html (7,069 bytes)

74. [TowerTalk] Foundation for a tower -- Rebar (score: 1)
Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 11:18:39 -0400
I had a very good experience using Hughes Supply for precut/bent rebar for a 45G tower I'm in the process of putting up. They made up the #4 pieces I requested in 3 days, for about $55 bucks. (No aff
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00672.html (7,149 bytes)

75. Re: [TowerTalk] A word about my X7/CC Baluns... (score: 1)
Author: "Blake M." <n4gi@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 05:44:32 -0400
Snipped: I made a 2el 40 out of surplus X7 40M add-on kits. Both of the "baluns" I got had this problem. It looked like some sort of hard shock had broken the wire from the center of each of the SO23
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00003.html (8,327 bytes)

76. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 stub tops (score: 1)
Author: "Blake M." <n4gi@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 12:54:31 -0400
One thing to remember about with the little 25G flat top, though, is that the rotor can only be placed either 1' down from the top or at the next lower joint. For a "normal" mast (10-15') this limits
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00127.html (8,958 bytes)

77. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Down Due To Cindy Tell Ne What You Think (score: 1)
Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 16:33:16 -0400
And it's important to add that (at least in my area) this can even apply to situations where the falling structures have not been properly permitted, even though required. My car got once got wrecked
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00338.html (8,142 bytes)

78. Re: [TowerTalk] RADIAL STAPLES (score: 1)
Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:00:45 -0400
Type "sod staples" into a search enginge of your choice. Usually stocked by landscaping/contracting supply places, they come in boxes of thousands... 73, Blake N4GI __________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00447.html (8,904 bytes)

79. Re: [TowerTalk] Wrapping Phillystran with grips (score: 1)
Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:45:40 -0400
Pull outward on the legs of the preform while wrapping. Allows better "bulge control" and eliminates the need for large amounts of tension. 73, Blake N4GI ____________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00865.html (10,215 bytes)

80. Re: [TowerTalk] Bearings in Rotators (score: 1)
Author: "Blake M." <n4gi@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:48:28 -0400
FWIW... I recently had one of my Ham-Ms repaired. Granted, it was severely overloaded, however it lasted more than a year before croaking. I knew it had some teeth sheared off the ring gear (Al, not
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00779.html (11,907 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu