- 1. [TowerTalk] Alumatower (this is not about BPL or Permits!) (score: 1)
- Author: "Brian Lambert" <n1ik@n1ik.com>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 18:23:57 -0500
- Hi All, N1IK, Brian, here. At the risk of starting a tower-related thread (hi hi), I was wondering whether anyone out there would like to comment on Alumatower products? Last year I got the opportuni
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00223.html (7,554 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Question on concrete pour for self-supporting tower... (score: 1)
- Author: "Brian Lambert" <n1ik@n1ik.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:30:16 -0500
- Hi, Could anyone tell me whether one must pour all the concrete for a self-supporting tower base in one pour, or is it OK to mix up bags of concrete over n weekends, and pour them into the form as yo
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00303.html (7,337 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Thanks! (score: 1)
- Author: "Brian Lambert" <n1ik@n1ik.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:20:02 -0500
- Thanks to all for the responses. I sort of figured as much, but I wanted to ask the question to be sure. The responses make the question clear -- pour it all at once! 73 and more news as it happens,
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00314.html (6,718 bytes)
- 4. RE: [TowerTalk] SteppIR, still in business? (score: 1)
- Author: "Brian Lambert" <n1ik@n1ik.com>
- Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 05:18:07 -0400
- Martin, Not sure what's happening in your case, but I sent mail to SteppIR a few weeks back and received a response from Mike Mertel (President) right away -- under one day elapsed time. A followup q
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00147.html (9,755 bytes)
- 5. RE: [TowerTalk] 2 identical antennas (score: 1)
- Author: "Brian Lambert" <n1ik@n1ik.com>
- Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 19:41:53 -0400
- Well, it depends mainly on your terrain, but, generally, the higher antenna will exhibit better low-angle performance (DX), and the lower antenna will exhibit better high angle performance. You shoul
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00162.html (8,866 bytes)
- 6. RE: [TowerTalk] New antenna system (score: 1)
- Author: "Brian Lambert" <n1ik@n1ik.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 14:48:26 -0500
- Keith, "appliance operator"... So, what, real HAMS use linearly loaded Yagis? Real HAMS use LPDAs? That's the funniest thing I read all day. I can't imagine what attribute of a SteppIR antenna makes
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00192.html (16,395 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TowerTalk] A SteppIR Performs So Well (score: 1)
- Author: "Brian Lambert, N1IK" <n1ik@n1ik.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 19:24:01 -0500
- Hi All, I find this all so laughable!!!! I drive a 4 element SteppIR at ~60', by various radios and, at times, an Alpha 87A, and I call tell you all from first had experience it is a WMD -- Weapon of
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00513.html (10,946 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR (score: 1)
- Author: "Brian Lambert, N1IK" <n1ik@n1ik.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:47:37 -0500
- Gary. Good points. We'll just have to wait and see. If we see massive failures in 5 years, there will be a class-action suit against FM by angry amateurs who will allege that Mike knew the design was
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00745.html (11,399 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu