Mail Archive Search: <+from:mikerauh@ic.org>

Results:

References: [ +from:mikerauh@ic.org: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Rohn TB55D Torque Bars and Torque Arm Lugs for the TA55 (score: 1): Author: mikerauh@ic.org (Michael Rauh); Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 15:20:37 -0400; Hi TTer's, Rohn says they no longer make TB55D torque bars for use with the GA55GD guy bracket. Does anyone know have dimensions for these torque bars so I can make my own, or know where I can buy so; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00032.html (8,047 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] guy rod angle (score: 1): Author: mikerauh@ic.org (Mike Rauh); Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2001 14:56:01 -0400; Hello TT: How does Rohn compute the guy rod angle? I tried taking the vector sum of the guy pretension. That gives an angle that is too low. I didn't consider sag; if I did, the angle would be even l; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00062.html (8,122 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] guy rod angle (score: 1): Author: mikerauh@ic.org (Michael Rauh); Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 22:25:30 -0400; Jerry, Stan, Dave, Tom, I agree with Jerry and Stan - the angle is probably not critical. Rohn presents the angle to 0.1 degree in their guyed tower drawings. This seems impossibly precise to me - th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00198.html (10,711 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] guy rod angle (score: 1): Author: mikerauh@ic.org (Michael Rauh); Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 17:25:42 -0400; The rod angle is indeed the angle of the (guy anchor) foundation reactions. Foundation reactions are given in the Rohn catalog for their example towers. In general, we don't know the guy anchor react; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00671.html (9,349 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Tower fall claims the life of Texas amateur (score: 1): Author: mikerauh@ic.org (Michael Rauh); Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 14:53:37 -0400; This is from yesterday's ARRL Letter. I appreciate all those who have posted on tower safety - the importance of this topic can't be overemphasized, in my book. - Mike Rauh, NV7X ** * Tower fall clai; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00230.html (8,243 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Substitute thicker Phillystran? (score: 1): Author: mikerauh@ic.org (Michael Rauh); Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 12:10:34 -0400; Hello All, My tower plans call for 11,200 lb Phillystran for the top guys. I've been offered 27,000 lb Philly. Questions: 1. Do I need to pretension the 27,000 lb breaking strength Phillystran to 2,7; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00258.html (8,509 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Substitute thicker Phillystran? (score: 1): Author: mikerauh@ic.org (Michael Rauh); Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 21:34:09 -0400; Reply to mikerauh@ic.org Hank, Thanks to you and all who posted on my question. I feel a lot more confident about trying out the thicker philly, and your advice has saved me about $600. Maybe someday; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00311.html (8,404 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]