Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mike@mallardcove.com: 78 ]

Total 78 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TowerTalk] WTB: Tower Safety Climbing Belt (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 07:27:44 -0600
www.championradio.com carries climbing belts. I have two of his harnesses. This is not an area to be bargain hunting. I am need of a safety belt for tower climbing. I am a casual climber but still ne
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00286.html (7,705 bytes)

62. Re: [TowerTalk] C31XR versus SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 16:46:56 -0600
Blow the balun on the F12 and you are out of action too. The separate feedlines is an advantage if you need that kind of flexibility. I have to wonder what all those extra elements do to the pattern.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00148.html (10,906 bytes)

63. Re: [TowerTalk] C31XR versus SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 08:56:19 -0600
Switch to 180 degree mode and you will quickly figure out if you have a reflector or not. Next someone is going to tell us that traps are wonderful things too. I guess they are if you like loss. The
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00160.html (10,310 bytes)

64. Re: [TowerTalk] C31XR versus SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 10:24:58 -0600
Ford............ Better being very subjective to the contester or dxer in general. Most of the SteppIR owners I know don't believe they are perfect. As an outside observer on this one: There haven't
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00167.html (9,863 bytes)

65. Re: [TowerTalk] C31XR versus SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 11:48:07 -0600
Optimum for what? Gain, F/B, pattern? Who defines what is optimal? What he said is that you can overcome many of the issues with fixed element spacing if you have the ability to vary the element leng
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00263.html (10,258 bytes)

66. Re: [TowerTalk] C31XR versus SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 16:52:14 -0600
We are not talking about monobanders built on a specific sized boom. We are talking about multiband antennas. Which the C31 and SteppIR are. The reason the 10m F/B is much lower is because the driven
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00278.html (11,167 bytes)

67. Re: [TowerTalk] TRYLON TITAN 64 SELFSUPPORT (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 14:57:57 -0600
You do not have to use forms. That is what I have done on two towers. You will probably end up with a bigger hole than is required so expect to use more concrete. Back hoes are not that precise. Tryl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00572.html (10,452 bytes)

68. Re: [TowerTalk] 4el Steppir vs. OB-16-3 (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 15:52:55 -0600
The OB-163 has 8 elements on 10m. Does not have any elements for 17 or 12. It is very large. I believe the SteppIRs do so well because there is not all that other aluminum sitting out on the antenna.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00026.html (9,070 bytes)

69. Re: [TowerTalk] 4el Steppir vs. OB-16-3 (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 17:24:31 -0600
A decent stack of just about anything will be better than the single antenna alone. You have another antenna to share in SO2R for one. Stacking height was not mentioned. Someday 10 and 15 will be bac
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00030.html (12,000 bytes)

70. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR problem (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:45:52 -0600
Easier said than done. The controller uses a 25 pin connector. He would have to cut the cable and then solder up a connector. I have a 300 ft run of cable in Colorado and have had no issues at all. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00230.html (13,131 bytes)

71. Re: [TowerTalk] step away from stepIR (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:03:23 -0600
They are not the same as any old antenna on the same footprint. But that is really not helpful to the person that is having a problem. See ya in da pileups.. 73 Gil W1RG (with a 3 el Steppir...) ____
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00278.html (9,406 bytes)

72. Re: [TowerTalk] step away from step IR (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:44:46 -0600
You on the east coast to Europe and the SteppIR on the West Coast? :-) step ir is a religion you say,Well my 34 year old mosley just took a 3 el step ir to religious instructions on 20 meters. tony K
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00366.html (7,807 bytes)

73. [TowerTalk] 80m 4 squares using shortened verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:49:05 -0600
I have searched Google for quite a while now and have come up empty. Has anyone used/modeled/etc an 80m 4 sq over a full sized 4 sq. array? I have not really found any shortened 80 verticals. I am no
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00259.html (7,141 bytes)

74. Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 66-Foot Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:13:21 -0600
Here is the webpage for the 65 ft verticals from DXE. I have had a number of people ask where I found it. It is found under vertical antenna parts Aluminum tubing kits. http://www.dxengineering.com/P
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00301.html (8,983 bytes)

75. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 91, Issue 84 SURGE Protection Sprcial (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:10:10 -0600
I put a similar device on my meter here in Montana. I was losing electronics fairly regularly, mostly cheap cordless phones. No problems since and there is a guarantee with coverage limits. I think I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00697.html (10,042 bytes)

76. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 91, Issue 84 SURGE Protection Sprcial (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2010 21:18:29 -0600
Meter readers? What are those. My rurual MT home has a sending device that tells the Power Company how much juice I am using. In Colorado they just installed some new gadget that allows them to drive
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00025.html (9,066 bytes)

77. Re: [TowerTalk] cable locating (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:38:12 -0600
and if you hit something that was not marked they won't hold you responsible. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list To
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00622.html (8,288 bytes)

78. Re: [TowerTalk] Underground Utilities (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 08:46:20 -0600
Swimming pool pipes and sprinkler lines are not utilities. We are talking about utility locates. It appears that Florida has this service too. In Florida, calling 811 is free and it connects you to S
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00632.html (13,733 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu