Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:lists@oakcom.org: 523 ]

Total 523 documents matching your query.

161. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: tower insulators (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 22:02:21 -0400
Sheesh. I understood it EXACTLY. No one is going to use 3/8" rod for leg insulators, no matter what silly misunderstanding occurred here. -Steve K8LX Steve-- I think YOU didn't understand what was sa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00040.html (12,325 bytes)

162. Re: [TowerTalk] Tuf-Tug question (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 22:37:49 -0400
When working correctly, the weight of the *slider* is enough to keep it sliding ahead of (below) the D-ring it's attached to when descending, but not ahead of a *falling* D-ring of course. In practic
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00319.html (7,276 bytes)

163. Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 20:42:27 -0400
Sounds like you've had some attitude (altitude) adjustment tonight. I agree. -Steve K8LX Now that I'm 85 when the temperature is above 90 degrees I limit my free climbing to 300 ft. and 700 ft. when
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-10/msg00069.html (9,518 bytes)

164. Re: [TowerTalk] Guyed + self supporting /2 ?? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 21:02:04 -0400
Actual modelling shows that guying can increase the load limits if properly applied. In the crank up tower case, UST specifically says its OK to guy the base section. The load on the base will be le
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-10/msg00164.html (9,401 bytes)

165. Re: [TowerTalk] Guyed + self supporting /2 ?? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 07:02:46 -0400
After much repeated discussion on this forum over the years I asked a structural engineer about this, and he confirmed what you are saying - that basically a guy system could be designed for pretty
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-10/msg00173.html (10,528 bytes)

166. Re: [TowerTalk] Guyed + self supporting /2 ?? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 21:29:44 -0400
No you didn't read it correctly Roger. His opinion was exactly as stated, that a guy system could be designed for a (existing) self supporter that would favorably impact the load rating. Maybe only a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-10/msg00187.html (14,337 bytes)

167. Re: [TowerTalk] simple station design (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 08:09:47 -0400
I think he may be looking for an app that will do a station block diagram. In that case something like Smartdraw works pretty well. -Steve K8LX On 10/17/2014 7:00 AM, David Robbins wrote: For my so2r
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-10/msg00194.html (8,920 bytes)

168. Re: [TowerTalk] Adhesive lined heat shrink for connectors (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 20:47:26 -0500
I've been purchasing "lined" heatshrink in quantity for a number of years from an on-line seller called "buyheatshrink.com". Yes the name is a little hokey, but the quality seems as good as 3M at abo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-11/msg00055.html (8,420 bytes)

169. Re: [TowerTalk] Crimp-on connectors for hardline. (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 18:55:53 -0500
One small point....UHF connectors for LDF4 (or ANY hardline or corrugated cable for that matter) have not been manufactured for a number of years, and unless you're lucky, you'll pay dearly for them
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00037.html (10,714 bytes)

170. Re: [TowerTalk] Crimp-on connectors for hardline. (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 19:01:28 -0500
RE: UHF connectors for LDF4 Interesting, did not know that. I've used a ton of RFC connectors though, and they are very good quality. -Steve K8LX Second Try: http://www.rfcoaxconnectors.com/new-produ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00038.html (9,115 bytes)

171. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: Running feed line and rotor cable together? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 23:55:22 -0500
There's something to that. In CATV, there was for a time a popular type of smooth wall 75 ohm hardline called "fused disc', which had lower loss over the 300 MHz or 500 MHz in use by cable TV at the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00324.html (8,431 bytes)

172. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Long shank U-Bolts (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 20:52:07 -0500
This is a very common problem in the commercial tower industry. One common solution, which I initially (decades ago) rejected as being crude but gradually came to accept as elegant, is to use bent (o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00424.html (9,040 bytes)

173. Re: [TowerTalk] Now THIS is a tower climb! (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 19:52:23 -0500
Here's another - short and nicely done with with a dronecam. http://tinyurl.com/nfr4nkm -Steve K8LX This is video of a technician climbing 1768 feet to the top of a transmissions tower for repairs. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00218.html (8,083 bytes)

174. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Now THIS is a tower climb! (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:32:05 -0500
Lot's of broadcast towers are lit with LEDs, that's old news. A little pricey to install, but well worth it for the long term bottom end. OTOH, OTA broadcast companies are wondering what the long ter
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00236.html (10,193 bytes)

175. Re: [TowerTalk] Now THIS is a tower climb! (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:42:34 -0500
Can vary from $500 to $3500 or more, depending on various factors: market (local rates? union?), customer requirements (changing all the bulbs or just the burned out ones), adherence to OSHA rules (a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00237.html (9,176 bytes)

176. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 18:20:23 -0500
I was flabbergasted at the response to Duffy's post, which seemed relatively non controversial to this relatively low level scientific brain of mine. Can't one specify a perfect ground (even though i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00423.html (12,268 bytes)

177. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 20:03:43 -0500
Can't one specify a perfect ground (even though impossible in the real world) when modeling antennas? Is that not a useful exercise as an educational tool? The only good reason for *assuming* homoge
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00445.html (10,332 bytes)

178. Re: [TowerTalk] Dipole Center Insulator (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:25:53 -0500
IMO, strain-relief is the Main Attraction for rolling your own *connector-less* center insulator. Especially for the scenario where the feedpoint is suspended half way between the end supports. If th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00205.html (8,951 bytes)

179. Re: [TowerTalk] rg-59 manufacturer (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 20:12:00 -0500
This sounds like video cable, not RF cable. Probably has copper braid shield and solid dielectric. For many baseband video applications (generally rated for 6 MHZ), the characteristic impedance would
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00253.html (8,686 bytes)

180. Re: [TowerTalk] Water in Conduit... (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 19:08:45 -0500
There's lot's of reasons to not bet your life on no leaks. That's a big reason plumbers stay busy. Youse guys are talking about piddly ass 100' runs. But even with a 100' run, expansion/contraction c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-03/msg00075.html (9,639 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu