Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kstover@ac0h.net: 40 ]

Total 40 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Rebar Cage for Foundation (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stover, AC0H" <kstover@ac0h.net>
Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 09:56:30 -0500
Your average run of the mill Tashjian tower, say the LM470, 70'tall, four sections. It's rated for 20 sqft wind load at the top of the tower, not at the end of the 5-10 foot underrated mast most hams
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-05/msg00038.html (11,144 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] Rebar Cage for Foundation (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stover, AC0H" <kstover@ac0h.net>
Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 10:11:21 -0500
All Welding rebar is not for your average Ham Radio doofi. You need the right steel, the right sticks, the right wire/gas if MIG welding, the correct technique (the hard part). A welded connection wh
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-05/msg00039.html (10,325 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] Home Weather Station (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stover, AC0H" <kstover@ac0h.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 11:10:12 -0500
The Peet Bros. 2100 is continuous. On 6/15/2017 1:10 PM, Chris wrote: When considering WX stations, some of you guys may find this irritating like I did... but be aware that some WX stations only rep
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-06/msg00192.html (12,947 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Grounding connection to tower legs (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stover, AC0H" <kstover@ac0h.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 11:03:26 -0500
Leave the galvination in place. I don't think you have to mess with paste or paint of any sort. I would protect the connection from weather. Do not remove the galvanization. Just put some layer of Va
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-10/msg00231.html (11,200 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] Feeding a quad (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stover, AC0H" <kstover@ac0h.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 17:20:49 -0600
Cubex Quads recommends 1/4 wavelength 75 Ohm matching sections for each band. Might need 3/4 for the 10m driven depending how far from the relay box. So does this NCJ article. ncjweb.com/features/jan
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-11/msg00208.html (9,544 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] Fall PROTECTION (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stover, AC0H" <kstover@ac0h.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 18:03:39 -0600
Totally agree with the prevailing sentiment that this harness is NOT for tower work. However it does a fine job of keeping deer hunters attached to their trees/tree stands. Wayne PS this would work y
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-12/msg00111.html (9,162 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] common mode chokes, baluns and multiband doublets (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stover, AC0H" <kstover@ac0h.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:10:10 -0600
Bill, Ditch the 450 Ohm window line. The antenna is not going to be balanced and the window line won't "balance" it for you. What happens to balanced line, doesn't matter the impedance, when it becom
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-12/msg00120.html (11,123 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] Icom 7610 & C31XR (score: 1)
Author: <kstover@ac0h.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 17:09:50 -0500
Not nearly enough information. You won't know till you try it. I am considering purchasing a Icom 7610 to use with my C31XR with separate feedline and 500 watt linear. How much filtering do I need to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-03/msg00137.html (8,213 bytes)

29. [TowerTalk] Upgrade (score: 1)
Author: <kstover@ac0h.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 18:19:31 -0500
OK Tower Talkers. I need wisdom and guidance. I am finally in a position to start building my retirement station meaning a BIG upgrade in the tower and antenna department. Here is my plan. 70? AN Wir
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-04/msg00261.html (8,701 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna wind load vs tower specs. (score: 1)
Author: <kstover@ac0h.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 13:11:55 -0500
I'm planning one now and am using the Projected Area number on the JK site. JK Mid-Tri = 16sqft JK 12/17 Jr = 7.8sqft (I use 8) JK 402T = 9.3sqft ( I use 9.5) 20 foot out the top 3" mast 5 sqft All t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-04/msg00303.html (9,913 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] Need recommendations for a 40-10m. Yagi (score: 1)
Author: <kstover@ac0h.net>
Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 11:52:06 -0500
I posted similarly a couple weeks ago and got some good advice from the reflector. It's come down to the JK Mid-Tri/40 and the Optibeam OB12-4W. The JK is 40/20/15/10m, the Optibeam is 40/20/17/15. T
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-05/msg00051.html (9,729 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] 5 Band Yagi with more than 2 elements per band (score: 1)
Author: <kstover@ac0h.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 11:49:46 -0500
Exactly. Milled aluminum that are bolted to the element plates. The elements are installed using polyamide clamps on the bottom of the element plates. Look up polyamide. Kevlar is a polyamide. The bo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-07/msg00208.html (11,446 bytes)

33. [TowerTalk] Tower height calculator for airports (score: 1)
Author: <kstover@ac0h.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 12:56:48 -0500
Is there an online calculator for acceptable tower heights within say 2 miles of an airport runway. I am 1.71 miles south and east of the end of the 5/23 runway at Des Moines International. I am of t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-07/msg00210.html (7,457 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower height calculator for airports (score: 1)
Author: <kstover@ac0h.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 13:59:52 -0500
Found it. http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/AsrSearch/towairSearch.jsp It seems that my hacienda is inside of a 10,000 foot radius which sticks me in the 100:1 zone. 9, 028 feet/100 means I'm good up t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-07/msg00212.html (8,768 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower height calculator for airports (score: 1)
Author: <kstover@ac0h.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 14:26:33 -0500
Whoopsie, I estimated my hacienda elevation at 928. It's actually 901.5. Makes a difference in the Towair calculator. The 5/23 runway at KDSM is at 915.6 with a 0.4% UP gradient. R. Kevin Stover AC0H
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-07/msg00213.html (9,485 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] Towers near airports (score: 1)
Author: <kstover@ac0h.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 17:40:06 -0500
I read in the reg that if you have obstructions, trees, that are higher than your planned tower you are exempt as long as you keep the tower lower than the trees. R. Kevin Stover AC0H ARRL, FISTS, SK
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-07/msg00241.html (10,257 bytes)

37. Re: [TowerTalk] Fiberglass Enclosure (score: 1)
Author: <kstover@ac0h.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2018 15:04:42 -0500
These are epoxy powder coated steel not fiberglass. http://www.kf7p.com/KF7P/JunctionsBoxes.html R. Kevin Stover AC0H ARRL, FISTS, SKCC, NAQCC. "If it doesn't work the first time you push the button
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-08/msg00044.html (8,095 bytes)

38. [TowerTalk] Top loaded tower for 80 and 160m (score: 1)
Author: <kstover@ac0h.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 18:02:21 -0500
So...1/4 wavelength vertical on 80 meters, 65', and add top loading for 160 or 1/4 wavelength on 160 and try to figure out how to load a 1/2 wave vertical for 80m? The property I am buying has a humo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-08/msg00114.html (7,307 bytes)

39. [TowerTalk] SteppIR interaction with 40m beam. (score: 1)
Author: <kstover@ac0h.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 19:06:54 -0500
Hello all. I seriously considering a 4el SteppIR 20-6m and a JK Antenna's JK402T with the 402T above the SteppIR around 20 feet. Obviously the elements of the SteppIR aren't going to be a problem for
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-10/msg00171.html (6,868 bytes)

40. Re: [TowerTalk] Optibeam OBLY14-5 (score: 1)
Author: <kstover@ac0h.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 05:54:45 -0600
I'm about to make a decision between the 4 el SteppIR 20-6m and the 16 el version of the Optibeam Log-Yagi. Whichever way I go that antenna with the JK402T I'm going to stack above it will be turned
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-11/msg00137.html (10,016 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu