Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kq2m@earthlink.net: 113 ]

Total 113 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn Torque Bars (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 09:37:30 -0400
Bad idea! Helping to better equalize and spreading out the horizontal and vertical forces over a wider area is usually a good idea. I see little meaningful UPSIDE to be gained from NOT using them. Th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00019.html (8,363 bytes)

82. Re: [TowerTalk] Grid dip meter and Yagi elements (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 23:19:26 -0400
Hi Dale, Tom nailed it when he said to buy a real GDO. Years ago, I also bought the MFJ "plug-in" for the purpose of tuning and cutting 1/4 wave coax stubs. This purchase was based on the MFJ tech's
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00074.html (10,286 bytes)

83. [TowerTalk] Compromised 80 M 4 square? (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 10:29:29 -0400
Gentlemen: I have some questions regarding how the performance of my 80 meter 4-square might be affected under two difference situations.... 1) (This is the current situation) 80 M 4 square with 160
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00184.html (8,286 bytes)

84. [TowerTalk] Tower Bolts (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 09:30:16 -0400
Hi Guys, I have two different types of galvanized bolts that need identification. Here are the details: Bolt #1 2 3/4" long Thread 1 1/8" long On the top there is a raised "BRL" Bolt #2 1 5/8" long T
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00260.html (6,943 bytes)

85. [TowerTalk] Re: Bolts, ID?? (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 23:40:55 -0400
Hi Mel, The diameter of the head of both bolts is 9/16". I can't tell you the thread pitch since I am not familiar with that term. I am very skeptical of these bolts sold to me as "Rohn Hardware", bu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00277.html (7,896 bytes)

86. [TowerTalk] Re: Nuts & Bolts... (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 08:14:15 -0400
Hi, Thanks to you AK6I and K8RI for the explanation of TPI. I measured BOTH bolts and it appears that they are BOTH 16 TPI. Regarding the size of the bolts, the diameter of BOTH bolts appears to be a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00284.html (8,922 bytes)

87. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna height vs hassle (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 19:43:00 -0400
Is it a matter of not being able to get the concrete truck close to the hole, or you can't get anything near the hole? At my qth there was no way to get a concrete truck closer than 150' from my 130'
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00428.html (11,960 bytes)

88. Re: [TowerTalk] Re Tower Cost (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 09:19:00 -0400
Hi Jack, What about.... 1) Guy grips? 2) Equalizer plate x 3? 3) Ice clips? 4) Rebar and wire for the base? 5) Wood and nails for the concrete forms? 6) Rental of the concrete mixer? 7) Visit to the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00473.html (8,897 bytes)

89. Re: [TowerTalk] antennas and trees (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 22:20:09 -0400
Hi Jim, How does this change if a 100'tall 12" diameter tree is less than 2 feet from the vertical or inverted L leg? Then what happens when the 2' foot away tree is modeled with a series of trees ab
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00328.html (11,915 bytes)

90. Re: [TowerTalk] antennas in the woods (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 09:47:08 -0400
You can ALWAYS do more. The question is, What difference in performance can you reasonably expect, for a contemplated investment of additional time and money? "Hope for the best?" I think that's pre
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00341.html (7,570 bytes)

91. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: antennas and trees. (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 14:22:30 -0400
John, The statement "the antennas I have in trees work just fine" has no meaning. Fine compared to what? I have MANY antennas in the trees. I want to find out how compromised they might be where they
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00377.html (9,988 bytes)

92. [TowerTalk] re: Antennas and trees (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 17:00:49 -0400
Ha Ha Ha! Exactly my point. BTW the answer is YES to all those things. And antenna modeling and terrain modeling made that all possible! I'm a believer. 73 Bob KQ2M better performance? Better _______
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00380.html (7,700 bytes)

93. [TowerTalk] re: Antennas and trees (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 15:15:48 -0400
Ha Ha Ha! Exactly my point. BTW the answer is YES to all those things. And antenna modeling and terrain modeling made that all possible! I'm a believer. 73 Bob KQ2M better performance? Better _______
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00383.html (8,112 bytes)

94. Re: [TowerTalk] Ham IV Rotator (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 11:45:23 -0400
Hi Carl, This happens to me a lot, especially when I haven't rotated my antennas in a few weeks or months. I press the brake down for about 5 seconds and then gently alternate between pressing the ri
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00394.html (8,695 bytes)

95. Re: [TowerTalk] antennas in trees (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 21:22:21 -0400
Correct! But evaluating whether or not it is practical or desired DEPENDS on what you believe you might gain by doing that. And some of that information necessary to do an intelligent analysis and e
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00408.html (11,456 bytes)

96. Re: [TowerTalk] antennas in trees (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 05:50:17 -0400
and area. I'm not sure where you came up with this idea, perhaps you can enlighten all of us? Bob KQ2M _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Suppor
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00415.html (8,100 bytes)

97. Re: [TowerTalk] antennas in trees (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:59:32 -0400
Hi Tonno, Your experience is similar to mine. A wire antenna in the forest is definitely preferable to an identical wire antenna strung above the house. **HOWEVER**, When I disconnected my 160 phased
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00433.html (11,092 bytes)

98. Re: [TowerTalk] antennas in trees - reprise (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:53:18 -0400
I would add the following: This may or may not be true. Some of the variable may be inconsequential. No one with an excellent knowledge of modeling programs and a lot of time on their hands has serio
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00439.html (10,153 bytes)

99. Re: [TowerTalk] BPL (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 19:39:46 -0400
Hey Doc, It is really APPALLING that you can take an issue like this, that affects ALL of us, and use it as an flimsy excuse to slam Democrats! The last time that I checked, it was Michael Powell, a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00356.html (10,348 bytes)

100. [TowerTalk] Re: Tower Talk BPL (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 20:24:55 -0400
People who teach critical thinking and "logic" skills teach others to be OBJECTIVE and balanced in their UNBIASED assessment of the facts. In this instance you did neither. The only thing that was "O
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00364.html (9,564 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu