Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ke3q@msn.com: 220 ]

Total 220 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TowerTalk] What happened to the $15.50 W6AM book? (score: 1)
Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 20:56:01 -0500
Right, I was going to buy it at $15.50. At $29.50 or whatever I think I'll wait 'til it goes back down to $15.50. - Rich, KE3Q -- Original Message -- From: Ron Samchuk To: TowerTalk@contesting.com Se
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00019.html (7,948 bytes)

62. [TowerTalk] W6AM - "Don Wallace transformer?" (score: 1)
Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:42:37 -0500
I just came across, in a junk box, an old (appears to be thirties, maybe earlier) transformer clearly labeled "Don Wallace Transformer, type CH1." Anyone know if this is named for W6AM? 73 - Rich, KE
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00061.html (6,852 bytes)

63. Re: [TowerTalk] Portable operation with beam (score: 1)
Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 07:38:59 -0500
At our large W3AO Field Day (50 transmitter category last year), we take all our 20-10M yagis with the elements intact. We put them on a fullsize pickup with ladder rack (mine typically), with a flag
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00131.html (9,255 bytes)

64. Re: [TowerTalk] Guys + isolators ??? (score: 1)
Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 14:00:20 -0500
Guy anchor points, three, every 120 degrees, at a distance from the tower of 80% of the height, is standard. You can guy less (or more), but in the case of less, if you are near the maximum windload
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00137.html (9,938 bytes)

65. Re: [TowerTalk] re: Ham Radio Songs out there? (score: 1)
Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:38:41 -0500
" Umm, I don't know of any ham music reflector but this ain't it. We're happy to discuss topics about tower and HF antenna construction though. Cheers, Steve K7LXC TT ADMIN __________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00152.html (8,963 bytes)

66. Re: [TowerTalk] what is 'No Impact Towers'? (score: 1)
Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 10:32:59 -0400
There is obviously no such thing as "no impact." But we could debate that there may be "negative impact," "neutral impact," "positive impact," etc. Neutral impact may seem to be the same as no impact
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00554.html (10,110 bytes)

67. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower VS aeroplane suit dropped.... (score: 1)
Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:45:21 -0400
I used to fly Cessnas from our local air field, don't any more unfortunately, but for years I have observed small aircraft that I am convinced are below the 500-foot minimum permissible height "over
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00632.html (12,864 bytes)

68. [TowerTalk] Yaesu ATAS-120 and ATAS-100 mobile antennas (score: 1)
Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 16:38:43 -0400
I'm wondering if someone can tell me the difference between the Yaesu ATAS-120 and the Yaesu ATAS-100 HF mobile antennas. I have the 100 and have seen there's a newer version, the 120, out. My intere
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00117.html (7,287 bytes)

69. Re: [TowerTalk] TOWER ROTOR (score: 1)
Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 08:40:06 -0400
Hector, we admire your resourcefulness! I had recent experience working on a "Bush Hog" rotary mower that many of us are familiar with, that are widely used and widely available. The typical one atta
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00143.html (9,864 bytes)

70. [TowerTalk] last msg from KE3Q (score: 1)
Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 08:50:58 -0400
Correction, the last message was from KE3Q, not KE3O -- as in my signoff! I don't even know how that typo. happened! O and Q are at opposite ends of the keyboard. 73 - Rich, KE3...Q _________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00144.html (6,622 bytes)

71. [TowerTalk] towers & low-flying aircraft (score: 1)
Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 15:39:35 -0400
Picking up on the discussion about low-flying planes we had a little while back, if you can get the tail number with binoculars you can do a Google search and likely find the owner and home field, wh
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00191.html (6,787 bytes)

72. Re: [TowerTalk] Class 2 and Class 7 Poles (score: 1)
Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 16:35:49 -0400
It's completely practical. Comparative cost depends on your ready availability of cheap or free poles versus cheap or free tower sections, and cheap or free installation. First, telephones poles are
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00340.html (15,093 bytes)

73. Re: [TowerTalk] power handling limits of screwdriver antennas (score: 1)
Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 12:14:57 -0400
KC3VO modified his Tarheel antenna to handle a KW, as he demo-ed at a recent club meeting and at Dayton. He told us what changes inside he had made but I can't remember what he said. 73 - Rich, KE3Q
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00022.html (10,833 bytes)

74. Re: [TowerTalk] positioning Yagi with remote camera. (score: 1)
Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:44:10 -0400
I bought a pair of small color cameras for $45 at "BJ's Wholesale Club," a chain that is in my region (Maryland, USA) at least. Each comes with a cable that's about 20-30' long attached, with RCA plu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00169.html (10,539 bytes)

75. [TowerTalk] need info, Diamond X3000 (score: 1)
Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 16:55:10 -0400
Need info on the Diamond X3000 vertical. I believe it is 2M, 220, and 440. On their web site they list an X3200A, which I'm guessing is the update of this antenna. They do not seem to have any info o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00354.html (7,219 bytes)

76. [TowerTalk] correction, Diamond X300A (score: 1)
Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 17:27:59 -0400
Correction, it's an X300A, not X3000 or X3000A. 73 - Rich, KE3Q _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00355.html (6,976 bytes)

77. Re: [TowerTalk] Technique for Putting Don Radials? (score: 1)
Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 23:26:19 -0400
Credited to W0UN, not W5UN. He presented it in a "hints and kinks" sort of talk in the Dayton Antenna Forum, very interesting, some years back. I've mentioned it here on the reflector a couple times
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00450.html (9,643 bytes)

78. Re: [TowerTalk] HF LOG-PERIODIC ANTENNAS Comments Please (score: 1)
Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:29:28 -0400
Also, log periodics tend to be bigger (more elements on a given boom length) and heavier, so they require a huskier tower and rotator. A lot of them that many of us have seen actually user two towers
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00484.html (17,928 bytes)

79. [TowerTalk] Log periodics (score: 1)
Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:02:39 -0400
For me, major drawbacks for the log periodic is the extra weight and windload most of them have, due to so many elements, and the huskier boom required to carry all the elements. At least compared to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00518.html (7,457 bytes)

80. Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Anchors (score: 1)
Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:20:26 -0400
screw-in anchors work well for us at Field Day. Even "pound in" stakes for just 24 hours of operating. 73 - Rich, KE3Q _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00641.html (10,922 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu