Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kd7jyk@earthlink.net: 79 ]

Total 79 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TowerTalk] Peak Voltage at the Tip of Antennas (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 00:04:58 -0700
Aren't they in the MF/HF range? Isn't LF below 500kHz? Yes, ends at 300 kHz. A chart: https://www.tti.com/content/dam/MarketEYE/assets/Passives/me-zogbi-20151214/table-1.jpg Kurt ____________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-10/msg00155.html (8,424 bytes)

62. [TowerTalk] Rotator Question. (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 13:16:39 -0800
I have some small antennas on gimbal mounts, something like this: https://www.westmarine.com/dw/image/v2/BGFG_PRD/on/demandware.static/-/Sites-wm-master-catalog/default/dwae6ecc81/images/orig/1982463
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-11/msg00006.html (7,926 bytes)

63. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator Question. (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 16:16:06 -0800
Thanks to all for their responses, and suggestions for a rotator control, lot's of ideas, and I've figured out what I need for my application. Kurt _______________________________________________ ___
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-11/msg00055.html (7,355 bytes)

64. Re: [TowerTalk] Sources for SS Hardware ?? (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:37:34 -0800
Ultimately, it comes down to "trust your retailer"     One can ask for traceability to the mfr     One can ask for a certificate of conformance ~20 years ago, in the electronics industry, that was a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-11/msg00064.html (9,113 bytes)

65. Re: [TowerTalk] Anchoring (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 16:46:17 -0800
On 11/16/2022 15:12, Ken WA8JXM wrote: John is correct that "pipe" is poor for structural use. The proper term for what you need is "tube" which is structural and available in a wide range of diamete
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-11/msg00095.html (9,045 bytes)

66. Re: [TowerTalk] Anchoring (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 14:52:46 -0800
"No one has mentioned something else that would work. Get your wall strength/rigidity, then, fill it with concrete. Something to consider." The utility pole anchors I used, the same the power and tel
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-11/msg00106.html (8,947 bytes)

67. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Anchoring (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 21:51:22 -0800
On 11/17/2022 18:33, Hans Hammarquist via TowerTalk wrote: I used the same type as the utility companies. They are a lot cheaper if you buy them from a utility supply house. Anyhow I put them in with
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-11/msg00108.html (9,046 bytes)

68. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Anchoring (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 12:36:09 -0800
All the screw in anchors I've seen (several dozen, 30 years ago) had a continuous weld for the entire helix. I would say that a "tack weld + short weld" is a unit that was mis-manufactured (i.e. ship
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-11/msg00121.html (9,411 bytes)

69. Re: [TowerTalk] Anchoring (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 12:43:15 -0800
I have never seen one however a bust open type anchor is mentioned on W8JI's site: https://www.w8ji.com/screw_in_guy_anchors.htm I've seen them, played with one. The power companies here use their hy
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-11/msg00122.html (7,925 bytes)

70. Re: [TowerTalk] New York state wind survival requirements for antennas (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 20:23:01 -0800
NY state and possibly the whole US. A local building inspector is telling me that just like with towers, NY requires any antenna mounted on a tower to be able to withstand a 3-second wind gust at 115
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-11/msg00144.html (7,644 bytes)

71. Re: [TowerTalk] MFJ-259 (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2022 13:03:33 -0800
I also found they will vary in SWR indication from zero to infinity depending on the antenna relative to it's surroundings, even when theoretically perfect, AND, the two oddest, static on the meter f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-11/msg00165.html (9,135 bytes)

72. Re: [TowerTalk] Removing a K7NV Bracket that doesn't have the Spreader Bolt (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 22:38:48 -0800
I needed to spread some rails in a project, was hoping to find wedges with a threaded bolt, figured they couldn't be too pricey, boy was I wrong. They start in hundreds, and go to tens of thousands.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-11/msg00175.html (9,302 bytes)

73. Re: [TowerTalk] Reliability (or not) of SMA connectors (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2022 13:03:34 -0800
There's conductive, and inductive. JB Weld contains iron, and is magnetic. It's comparable to the ferrite materials used in RF. A good dollop of that inside each connector will accomplish something.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00076.html (9,124 bytes)

74. Re: [TowerTalk] ROhn 25 Storage (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2023 11:17:03 -0800
Florida ( Wasps and spiders ) clogging up the tubes which later becomes water dams. People have been known to cause the same problem themselves on new Rohn 25 because they didn't know the bolts were
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-01/msg00033.html (7,856 bytes)

75. Re: [TowerTalk] How To Remove Tarnish off Bare Copper Wires (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 13:56:05 -0800
I am hoping for some home "remedy" or simple mixture that does not involve some complex chemicals or procedures that can be applied on, brushed then rinsed off. TU 73 I use a clean small stainless st
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-02/msg00089.html (9,324 bytes)

76. Re: [TowerTalk] AFCI RFI? (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 11:13:48 -0700
"I'm having my electric service panel in our home replaced and wanted to ask if any of you have had experience, either good or bad, with code-required arc-fault circuit interrupters and related RFI?"
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-03/msg00021.html (8,036 bytes)

77. Re: [TowerTalk] AFCI RFI? (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 12:21:45 -0700
It is also true that a lot of panel manufacturers say "only use our breakers" - and if that's what it says, then that's what the NEC requires. Basic marketing. They don't say, "Use our panels, and AN
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-03/msg00024.html (8,785 bytes)

78. Re: [TowerTalk] AFCI RFI? (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 13:45:49 -0700
"There was no RF - I wasn't on the air then - but the breakers would trip every time the laserjet printer cycled. We had to switch to an inkjet printer." From what I heard, it was pretty typical, at
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-03/msg00027.html (9,905 bytes)

79. Re: [TowerTalk] Arcfault Breakers (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2023 14:18:21 -0700
1.  It's not marketing BS to require your brand of breakers in your brand of panel.  That's just stupid.  You really want manufacturer A to go through every single breaker design, current rating, sin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-03/msg00049.html (11,860 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu