Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kd4e@arrl.net: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Auto antenna tuner (score: 1)
Author: edoc <kd4e@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 15:45:13 -0500
Jim Lux wrote: There aren't a huge number of autotuners that can handle the high power (most are aimed at the 200W and under market).. I like my LDG tuners. Others have had good luck with the SGC lin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00616.html (10,050 bytes)

22. [TowerTalk] Large log-periodic array for 6.5-30 MHz continuous tuning (score: 1)
Author: edoc <kd4e@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 19:49:49 -0500
Anyone else seen this post from http://www.hamswap.com/hamgeargiveaway.html ? I have the acreage but no inclination to drive to PA and back to get this monster, nor the need to own it. Would be inter
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00655.html (8,086 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] Rise in steel prices? (score: 1)
Author: edoc <kd4e@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 14:35:19 -0500
I have been discussing this with a friend who sells steel pipe internationally. They have already taken a 40% increase and are expecting another 40% real soon. They are already on quotas with their s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00001.html (10,176 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] W4AN Silent Key (score: 1)
Author: edoc <kd4e@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 21:32:27 -0400
I am in communications with Dana, and will pass along whatever information I have. 73 Tom Wow, he was so young! You are a blessing to the family to serve as a buffer between his many fellow Hams and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00041.html (7,890 bytes)

25. [TowerTalk] Re: Quibbling About Sigs [Was: W4AN Silent Key] (score: 1)
Author: edoc <kd4e@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 10:16:39 -0400
Stan, Thank you for your thoughtful post. While my sig is fairly new it definitely was not created for the purpose of the TowerTalk list nor intentionally used vs not used in my post specific to the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00052.html (10,498 bytes)

26. [TowerTalk] Rohn 25G mounting bracket (score: 1)
Author: edoc <kd4e@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 16:09:31 -0400
As I recall someone was looking for one of these: 58. A Rohn 25G mounting bracket, for use against structures, etc., will secure the tower 8" from the structure, bery robust and very rare, $45. http:
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00100.html (7,981 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25G mounting bracket (score: 1)
Author: edoc <kd4e@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 17:24:42 -0400
I think it is supposed to be a picture but apparently something is wrong with the files there. Try this: http://home.inreach.com/bonehead/ASCII doc Tower (K8RI) wrote: -- Original Message -- From: "e
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00104.html (11,259 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] Class 2 and Class 7 Poles (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 18:08:50 -0400
I have been told that anywhere lightning is common a wood pole is a very bad idea because the antenna(s) and cables provide the only path for discharge of energy whereas a steel tower siphons off the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00345.html (18,210 bytes)

29. [RFI] Re: Air Force (& WalMart?) RFI in Florida (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 09:41:52 -0400
I think this thread may belong on the rfi@contesting.com so I have copied it there. That said, one wonders if operating 440 in WalMart might set off the inventory alarm systems? Depending on how well
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00393.html (9,493 bytes)

30. [RFI] Re: time to start using the radios in the freqs they aregoing use turn up the amps. : Air Force (& Wal-Mart?) RFI in Florida (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 16:58:37 -0400
That would be construed as intentional jamming, I was speculating about the impact of inadvertent (unintentional) rfi. I was thinking that the unintented noisy consequence from the inadvertent rfi mi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00398.html (12,417 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] Power ground (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 16:45:12 -0400
I am very interested in the well pipe element of the current tower ground thread. We are awaiting a County permit and will be building a new home this summer (steel walls and roof). We are using all
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00514.html (9,636 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] sealing connectors (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 09:50:27 -0400
Lowes had a supply problem with this stuff a year or so ago. I have seen it in months past -- it was in the paint department right next to the desk. John -- how long does this stuff stand up in the b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00220.html (10,162 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] Anti-climb measures (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 14:35:04 -0400
Hmmm ... perhaps three small trampolines at the base? ... ;-) Given that a tower is rarely climbed perhaps one might densely plant high-bush blueberry plants around the base and string the anti-bird
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00368.html (9,672 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu