Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k8ztt@mho.com: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] [Tower Talk] 7 wire rotator cable (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Williams" <k8ztt@mho.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 11:49:31 -0600
Jack, That 7 wire cable will work with any of the Ham M series, Tailtwister, etc. rotors. You really only need 6 wires in the first place (though 8 is better). The "trick" is to mount the phasing cap
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00082.html (9,861 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Tuning a Force 12 Mag 620/340N (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Williams" <k8ztt@mho.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 19:07:50 -0600
I posted the message on the Force 12 reflector, but I am sure there are some Force 12 user here and/or guys that are a lot more versed in antenna theroy than I !! I have a Mag 640/340N that has been
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00181.html (10,476 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Heights Towers Aluminum?? (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Williams" <k8ztt@mho.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:40:33 -0600
I have seen several interesting comments on the reflector concerning Heights Alum towers; and in fact, I posted a couple myself. As I mentioned in a previous post, I have three of them and they all t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00329.html (8,800 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Soldering Iron for outside use (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Williams" <k8ztt@mho.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:04:43 -0700
I saw a post referencing what I assume was what type of iron would work outside to solder a UHF male connector. One of the replys was from K5UJ and he said "A gun no matter how high watt isn't any go
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00038.html (7,446 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] phasing multiband verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Williams" <k8ztt@mho.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 20:32:09 -0600
Jamie, I have two Force 12 160 mtr verticals that I have spaced at 1/2 wave and am using the ComTek PVS-2 system. It uses a three wire configuration to switch three directions. Before I bought that,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00213.html (8,619 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] phasing multiband verticals (phasing at the antenna) (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Williams" <k8ztt@mho.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:09:30 -0600
Mal, You are certainly correct in being able to have the phasing box at the antenna (or anywhere else you might be inclined to run the two coax ant feed cables to). My bet is it is a function of cost
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00220.html (14,021 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] Buying 6" sections of Alum tubing (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Williams" <k8ztt@mho.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:12:53 -0600
In theory, buying 6 ft sections of tubing and throwing them up sounds like a good plan. I tried doing something similiar to that with the "remains" of a 2 ele 80 mtr beam. Very simple plan, take the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00310.html (15,085 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] 66-Foot Vertical (overlap of tubing) (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Williams" <k8ztt@mho.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 09:33:30 -0600
I have seen a lot of discussion of "how much" overlap of tubing you need when putting the sections together. On my "homebrew" vetical I used 3" because that is what the 80 mtr beam I used parts from
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00346.html (12,287 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] 66-Foot (20.1 meter) Vertical (overlap of tubing) (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Williams" <k8ztt@mho.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 23:32:52 -0600
Rob, I would totally agree with you as far as not using hose clamps (especially on the bottom) of a 66 ft vertical. However, I will disagree with you needing alum lattice tower. I constructed a 80 mt
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00374.html (11,486 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Ladder Line Splice (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Williams" <k8ztt@mho.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 19:53:17 -0700
I am not sure why you would need to insulate ladder line in the first place? I have seen ladder line made with bare copper wire; and I have a section of mine that a tree limb "removed" the insulation
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-12/msg00290.html (8,318 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Dual rotor controllers (score: 1)
Author: "K8ZTT" <k8ztt@mho.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:54:59 -0700
Ted, I forgot to mention that you would only need to use one of the internal capacitors, so you would only hook up six leads to one of the boxes. 8 and 4 would only be to one box. I forgot about that
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00577.html (10,266 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Dual rotor controllers (score: 1)
Author: "K8ZTT" <k8ztt@mho.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:48:34 -0700
Ted, I am doing just the opposite of what you are trying to accomplish. I have one controller and use it on five different rotators (mix of Ham IV's and Tale Twisters). In my case, I use sets of rela
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00578.html (10,470 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Antenna Problem (score: 1)
Author: "K8ZTT" <k8ztt@mho.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:53:40 -0700
Chuck, If you are SURE that the problem is not in the coax to the transformer; I would think you have isolated the problem to a bad transformer. Wires can break, short, cold solder joint, etc. I thin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00585.html (10,871 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Dual rotor controllers (score: 1)
Author: "K8ZTT" <k8ztt@mho.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:56:46 -0700
Dick, You have to have power for the meter to work. As I mentioned in my last email, you might get by with having both controllers hooked up in parallel (with the exception of the two leads for the p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00597.html (9,703 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] connecting radial wires (score: 1)
Author: "Dick" <k8ztt@mho.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:10:25 -0700
I recently put up the DX Engineering 43 ft vertical for use on 60 meters. I also purchased the DX Engineering radial plate and attached 60 radials (I think 37 to 38 ft each). I went to Home Depot and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00196.html (9,197 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Williams" <k8ztt@mho.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:07:58 -0600
Tom, I am not an antenna expert, but on 160M there seems to be quite a few guys using Inverted Ls. I will say that 80 ft is pretty low for any type of dipole on 80 meters (at least for a low angle of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00186.html (10,168 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] 2 el 40m beams (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Williams" <k8ztt@mho.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 16:10:54 -0600
Lonnie, I have a Force 12 Magnum 620/340 beam at an elevation 6685 MSL (120 ft AGL). It has been up over 10 years, and survived 75 mph winds (maybe slightly higher - my anemometer is 35 Ft AGL). The
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-05/msg00299.html (9,183 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] Smoking control box or-2800dc semi conclusion... (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Williams" <k8ztt@mho.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 17:37:07 -0600
Nat, To tell you the truth, I have never heard that; of course that "begs the question" as to why the "ground" screw is on the control box and the rotor connector if you are not suppose to use it. Ad
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-06/msg00052.html (9,047 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu