Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k7lxc@aol.com: 4683 ]

Total 4683 documents matching your query.

181. [TowerTalk] TS-940S For Sale (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Fri Jan 31 20:57:04 2003
Please refrain from posts that don't have anything to do with tower and HF construction topics. Thanks. Cheers, Steve K7LXC TT ADMIN
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00606.html (6,560 bytes)

182. [Towertalk] Pouring base of tower (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 11:04:12 EST
It should be in one pour so that the base is totally bonded together. If the bottom pour has 'gone off' and hardened, you wind up with two separate layers. Sometimes there are two pours if you have t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00008.html (9,035 bytes)

183. [Towertalk] coax losses over time (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 11:20:08 EST
quickly material, According to Press the Wireman, coax deteriorates even when stored in the dark in the basement. Whether it deteriorates more quickly outdoors I guess is the question. Cheers, Steve
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00010.html (7,258 bytes)

184. [Towertalk] Pouring base of tower (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 12:52:18 EST
I agree with all your pithy comments. Cheers, Steve K7LXC TOWER TECH
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00015.html (9,069 bytes)

185. [Towertalk] Diameter of Phillystran (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 17:19:41 EST
might I think the above is the data for the OLD Phillystran (stiff jacket and potted terminations required). Here's the current data for jacketed diameter: HPTG 1200 0.17" 4MM HPTG 2100 0.22" 6MM HPT
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00020.html (8,385 bytes)

186. [Towertalk] Force 12 vs. Cushcraft who wins? (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 18:35:19 EST
an gain ( DO NOT BELIEVE MANUFACTURER PUBLISHED GAIN FIGURES. (The exception are those of Force 12 net gain figures - they're pretty realistic and corroborate our findings.) You need a copy of the N0
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00023.html (9,178 bytes)

187. [Towertalk] Force 12 vs. Cushcraft who wins? (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 11:22:28 EST
Several years ago before F12 became the #1 ham radio antenna manufacturer, Champion Radio Products sold *some* F12 products. They tended to be custom antennas and only very occasionally a C-3 or C-4.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00058.html (9,617 bytes)

188. [Towertalk] Force 12 vs. Cushcraft who wins? TOWERTALK! (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 11:55:43 EST
on the Fellow TowerTalkians - Here's a little LXC/TT philosophy. Let's face it - just about everything discussed on TT has to do with BUYING something; i.e. towers, guy wires, cables, rotators, tower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00061.html (8,808 bytes)

189. [Towertalk] Force 12 vs. Cushcraft who wins? (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 12:37:52 EST
Hmm, actually there is a 2L quad in the test as well. Cheers, Steve K7LXC
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00064.html (8,109 bytes)

190. [Towertalk] Re: Force 12 vs. Cushcraft who wins? (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 15:11:14 EST
Well, that's because you talked to Natan who doesn't work at the factory but handles the email traffic. My point was that if you want to get ahold of Tom at the factory - good luck. Cheers, Steve K7L
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00074.html (6,769 bytes)

191. [Towertalk] Pouring base of tower (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 12:33:26 EST
Not necessarily. Many times in tower bases the purpose of the rebar is to keep the concrete from shrinking and cracking and is not structural. Cheers, Steve K7LXC TOWER TECH
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00165.html (8,269 bytes)

192. [Towertalk] 753 Articles Now on New antenneX CD Volume 7 (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 21:19:45 EST
FYI. Cheers, Steve K7LXC ONE OF OUR MOST POPULAR PUBLICATIONS The antenneX on CD-ROM is one of our most popular publications besides the online version itself. No Library is complete without one of t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00188.html (8,764 bytes)

193. [Towertalk] Force 12 boom & element failure (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 21:28:10 EST
duty Ah - the unidentified poster. I discourage anonymous posts - tnx. I'm not sure what your definition of "light duty service" means. Actually all of the F12 antennas get run through K7NV's YagiStr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00190.html (7,805 bytes)

194. [Towertalk] Dumb Question (swagged elements) (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 09:50:44 EST
Not really. You're talking 'skin effect' here - it's the outside of the conductor that does all the work. Good reason to polish the elements occasionally. Cheers, Steve K7LXC TOWER TECH
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00225.html (8,331 bytes)

195. [Towertalk] Dumb Question (swagged elements) (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 11:03:38 EST
In TowerTalk lore there are several subjects that will cause longtime TowerTalkians to roll their eyes and/or unsubscribe immediately; one of them is 'element polishing'. No, it's not true and no, it
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00227.html (8,346 bytes)

196. [Towertalk] Roof Tower stuff.... 2 by 4s, city, :( (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 14:13:13 EST
Well, thank you for sharing that with us. In the future, please don't. This is not a rant-and-rave reflector nor one dealing in political opinions. There are many outlets for your perspective - Tower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00251.html (8,790 bytes)

197. [Towertalk] LB Cebik's Tales & Technicals (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 13:47:06 EST
FYI. Cheers, Steve K7LXC Now, antenneX's Shopping Shack is proud to offer this CD-ROM Version 3.0 that has captured a collection of more than 500 of LB's articles and notes for your reading pleasure.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00270.html (8,392 bytes)

198. [Towertalk] crank up cable/rope replacement ? (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 18:27:01 EST
inside cable/ Congrats on a good deal. Now for the fun part - hi! As far as cable rust goes, it would have to be *real* penetrated rust and not just surface rust in order for this to be a problem. Si
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00295.html (14,496 bytes)

199. [Towertalk] Ground the coax braid on LPDA or not? (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 20:49:43 EST
me Cheers, Steve K7LXC TOWER TECH
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00298.html (8,319 bytes)

200. [Towertalk] US Tower Recabling (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 14:01:31 EST
for The original posted question had to do with one of their lattice towers - not the tubulars - and that's what I responded to. The MA-series tubulars are MUCH easier to recable. The lattice-types a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00347.html (6,960 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu