Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k6sti@att.net: 113 ]

Total 113 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [TowerTalk] Choke on feed point of dipole (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 06:07:20 -0800
"Horizontal antennas care NOTHING about soil quality but EVERYTHING about height." I often use this notion myself, but it is a simplification. It is not true in general. Some time ago I was surprised
/archives//html/Towertalk/2026-01/msg00047.html (10,227 bytes)

102. Re: [TowerTalk] Choke on feed point of dipole (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 04:23:57 -0800
"Now, reading that Brian had started it all, perhaps he might take it on." TA, the terrain analysis program I wrote in the 1990s, handled vertical as well as horizontal polarization. I went to some e
/archives//html/Towertalk/2026-01/msg00056.html (11,956 bytes)

103. Re: [TowerTalk] 1/4 wave vertical with counterpoise (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2026 12:56:36 -0800
"...nothing we do can change the effect that the ground has on takeoff angle." Nothing we yet know about. I don't believe I'm the only one who has spent some effort trying to find a way to achieve lo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2026-01/msg00092.html (9,694 bytes)

104. Re: [TowerTalk] Test Fixture for Common Mode Chokes (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 15:05:10 -0800
"Any thoughts on this text fixture?" Dave, use the Y21 method instead of the conventional S21 method to suppress any shunt capacitance in the test fixture. This S-parameter plotter implements both me
/archives//html/Towertalk/2026-01/msg00110.html (8,347 bytes)

105. Re: [TowerTalk] Test Fixture for Common Mode Chokes (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 16:27:42 -0800
"It looks like the Y21 method is a bit better, especially with increasing frequency, but the S21 is a decent proxy as is mentioned on the web page article already." Whether the Y21 method is needed d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2026-01/msg00112.html (9,365 bytes)

106. Re: [TowerTalk] Test Fixture for Common Mode Chokes (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 18:18:44 -0800
"Brian, would you consider the N2PK VNA in the "fancy" category rearding your calibration comment?" Jeff, I don't think the N2PK measures all four S-Parameters nor does it do a 12-term calibration. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2026-01/msg00115.html (9,435 bytes)

107. Re: [TowerTalk] Test Fixture for Common Mode Chokes (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 18:49:53 -0800
One last thing. Common-mode choke impedance is sensitive to capacitance across the choke. (The Y21 method suppresses shunt port capacitance, not port-to-port capacitance.) Proximity to anything condu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2026-01/msg00116.html (8,997 bytes)

108. Re: [TowerTalk] Test Fixture for Common Mode Chokes (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 23:18:51 -0800
"The N2PK is fully capable of 12-term calibration..." Thanks for setting me straight, Gary. Measurement of the choke and the feedline at the point of installation lets you calculates the benefit of a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2026-01/msg00121.html (8,475 bytes)

109. Re: [TowerTalk] Test Fixture for Common Mode Chokes (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 06:32:34 -0800
"A first approximation of the effectiveness of a choke in a specific installation can be computed in NEC by adding a resistive load equal to the resistive choking Z to the model, which includes the f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2026-01/msg00124.html (11,374 bytes)

110. Re: [TowerTalk] NanoVNA port impedances Re: Test Fixture for Common Mode Chokes (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 08:31:27 -0800
"At HF frequencies, Id be surprised of the Z is far off. (But I can measure it I have two NanoVNAs - Ill do that later today)" Jim, I'd be interested in what you measure. Port 1 for N6LF's NanoVNA-H4
/archives//html/Towertalk/2026-01/msg00127.html (8,246 bytes)

111. Re: [TowerTalk] Test Fixture for Common Mode Chokes (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2026 09:19:03 -0800
This plot shows how the conventional S21 method can overestimate the resistive part of common-mode choke impedance: https://i.postimg.cc/fy30Qk3f/R.png The Y21 method can plot the shunt capacitance a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2026-01/msg00133.html (9,707 bytes)

112. Re: [TowerTalk] Test Fixture for Common Mode Chokes (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2026 14:10:44 -0800
"(the process is useless if you only do it in one spot since as you say it could be a current minimum)" But the shield may have a traveling wave, either due to radiation or nearby lossy objects, the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2026-01/msg00136.html (9,860 bytes)

113. Re: [TowerTalk] Test Fixture for Common Mode Chokes (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2026 16:51:30 -0800
...I assume that we want to place the CMC as close to a current maximum as we can..." In the models I've looked at, that's invariably at the feedpoint. If you still have CM issues after installing a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2026-01/msg00140.html (10,338 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu