Mail Archive Search: <+from:jreisert@jlc.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:jreisert@jlc.net: 99 ]

Total 99 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] RE: Topband: stripping enameled wire (score: 1): Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert); Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 20:03:33 -0500; Tony, Until recently (more on this shortly), one preferred way was to use a compound called "Strip-X" if my memory serves me correctly. I think it was made by General Cement. One dip of the wire in t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00537.html (10,791 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] WTB CC XM520 and XM510 (score: 1): Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert); Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 17:36:53 -0500; Jim et al, The internal Cushcraft policy is simple. They have to sell "so many" (?) antennas of each type each year or discontinue same. I'm sure the number of sales per year on HF antennas is probab; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00114.html (11,251 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] choices (score: 1): Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert); Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:26:55 -0400; Steve, I worked over 275 entities on 80 and over 300 on 40 with my G5RV (at my prior QTH before moving to the new QTH) so I guess "LEAKY DUMMY LOADS" DO WORK...SOMETIMES. Joe, W1JR; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00431.html (11,022 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] JOE REISERT -- Undeliverable Mail (score: 1): Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert); Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 13:52:21 -0400; Hi John, My ISP has vert tight controls on incoming mail. He does a "reverse resolve" top keep out spam. If your ISP has this command disabled, he can't verify that the incoming mail is legitimate an; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00111.html (9,989 bytes)
5. [Towertalk] UV in So. Cal. - was "Coastal Corrosion" (score: 1): Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert); Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 14:22:52 -0400; Aaron, Larry may also suffer from SKIN CANCER in sunny California. If he waits another year, the West Nile Virus (which is now working its way Westward) will be there so watch out for mosquitos! BTW,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00112.html (10,171 bytes)
6. [Towertalk] SteppIR Performance and misleading advertising (score: 1): Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert); Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 15:10:00 -0400; Terry and Steve (WB2WIK), Why are you guys trying to trash Fluid Motion and putting our false data. If you notice, Fluid Motion gains are published in QST. Although they are in dBi (the typical numbe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00663.html (10,181 bytes)
7. [Towertalk] Need Antenna Advice! (score: 1): Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert); Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 19:02:05 -0400; Steve, I didn't look at the Fludid Motion specs. but I know the antenna is not optimum on 6 meters and I doubt they make that claim. If you check the literature, you will see that they have an option; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00697.html (12,142 bytes)
8. [Towertalk] Re: 40M add-ons (score: 1): Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert); Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 21:05:40 -0400; John, I put the Cushcraft 40 meter add-on on my A4S a few years ago. I blew up the 20 meter traps (the add-on) twice with only 500 Watts. The construction of the traps, when disassembled, was awful.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00785.html (8,419 bytes)
9. [Towertalk] 40-2CD LOADING COIL MOD. (score: 1): Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert); Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 19:56:29 -0400; Stew, If you study the 40-2CD loading coils (and the Cushcraft traps) carefully, you will find that they are only water resistant on the coils side with the wire being covered with heat shrink. Unfor; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00829.html (8,596 bytes)
10. [Towertalk] Re: 40M add-ons (score: 1): Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert); Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 20:23:00 -0400; Julio, Yes, I was contesting when the 20 meter/40 meter add-on trap blew up but below 500 Watts in the shack. However that is not the problem. When I opened and examined the 20 meter traps, I was hor; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00832.html (9,488 bytes)
11. [Towertalk] Intermitant high SWR (score: 1): Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert); Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 14:22:48 -0400; Bill, Yes, it's more than likely the traps that are causing the intermittent. The screws holding the can and the coil wires loosen up or sometimes oxidize! Less likely, but still a problem is that so; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00142.html (8,362 bytes)
12. [Towertalk] TH6DXX trap end caps (score: 1): Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert); Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 21:45:06 -0400; Jan, Don't sell the trap caps short. One end of each trap has a cap at the high impedance point and adds tuning capacitance so it is important that they be good and in the proper place! 73, Joe, W1JR; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00274.html (8,644 bytes)
13. [Towertalk] Re: remote antenna switch (score: 1): Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert); Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 08:42:45 -0400; Hi Jim, Transco also makes a single pole high isolation 4 position switch with construction similar to the Transco "Y" relay. It is sometimes referred to as a Porcupine (after the animal). It looks l; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00317.html (12,714 bytes)
14. [Towertalk] 40 MTR Trap ??? (score: 1): Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert); Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 08:29:53 -0400; Tom, At one time (per the catalog), Hygain marketed a 2BDQ 40/80 meter 101 foot dual band wire antenna using a pair of 40 meter traps. That is probably what you have. 73, Joe, W1JR; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00360.html (8,400 bytes)
15. [Towertalk] T2X Start cap at tower base? (score: 1): Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert); Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 18:52:15 -0400; Tony, In the past some people put the capacitor close to the rotator to free up 2 extra wires to parallel with others. This helps but I don't think the need for mounting the capacitor at the rotator; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00438.html (12,246 bytes)
16. [Towertalk] yagi (score: 1): Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert); Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 18:38:42 -0400; Dick, I used to supply such antennas to my customers all the time before I sold my company (now called Astron Wireless). TESSCO and other suppliers sell such antennas. You may have to adapt the coax; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00663.html (8,078 bytes)
17. [Towertalk] double bazooka (score: 1): Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert); Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2002 19:13:29 -0400; Hi Ted, Why not try the G5RV dipole. It's 102 feet long and can be shortened further by lengthening the 450 Ohm feedline. It will give good service on 80 and 40 with broadside pattern as well as 20 a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00110.html (9,235 bytes)
18. [Towertalk] double bazooka (score: 1): Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert); Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2002 07:24:43 -0400; Steve, With the G5RV dipole, you get reasonable VSWR on the major bands. On 80 meters it may get to 3:1 or so at edge of band but all my rigs with built in tuners worked fine and never used an extern; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00121.html (14,064 bytes)
19. [Towertalk] double bazooka (score: 1): Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert); Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2002 11:20:42 -0400; Hi Tom, Just to add a few words. In the early 1980's, Frank Witt, AI1H, was doing lots of work on broad banding 80-meter dipoles. He first explored the double bazooka and concluded it was slightly wi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00127.html (10,136 bytes)
20. [Towertalk] double bazooka (score: 1): Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert); Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2002 16:52:44 -0400; Hi Steve, My point about the G5RV is that as originally configured is that it yields a reasonable match to 50 Ohm on the major ham bands that most modern day radios can match WITHOUT AN ANTENNA TUNER; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00140.html (18,978 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]