Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jirka@jimaz.cz: 35 ]

Total 35 documents matching your query.

21. [TowerTalk] More input (score: 1)
Author: jirka@jimaz.cz (Jiøí anda)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:35:32 +0200
Hello everyone, I will come with my input. I do not own and did not owned any commercial antenna ! According to my - our (+OK1RF) experience the problem of vibrations of the tips of elements is a MAJ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00627.html (9,159 bytes)

22. [TowerTalk] Shadowing of small antennas by larger ones? (score: 1)
Author: jirka@jimaz.cz (Ji anda)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 10:36:31 +0100
73 ! Jiri OK1RI Hi Guy, in a multiband array using a single boom it's not an easy task to find out where to place planar and different bands elements without affecting negatively the antenna performa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00003.html (12,681 bytes)

23. FW: [TowerTalk] precipitation static & folded verticals (score: 1)
Author: jirka@jimaz.cz (Jiøí Sanda)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 14:49:17 -0800
Hi, not exactly true. My observation: 20m - two Yagis on two towers - one @52m the other @24m. The "static" is always worse on the high one. Here I agree with Tom. Sometimes it helps to listen on 20m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00594.html (10,578 bytes)

24. [TowerTalk] Shadowing of small antennas by larger ones? (score: 1)
Author: jirka@jimaz.cz (Ji anda)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:43:06 +0100
The effect of large antenna close to a smaller one is always HUGE. Try to model it and you will see. The effect can be eliminated by changing the sizes of the given antennas, the results are often un
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00722.html (11,580 bytes)

25. [TowerTalk] Shadowing of small antennas by larger ones? (score: 1)
Author: jirka@jimaz.cz (Jiøí Sanda)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 01:35:42 +0100
Hi, I agree. 1. Accuracy of modeling. Even with NEC2 or MININEC you get some results and you get probably lower impedances than the reality but the radiation pattern is probably more-less correct. 2.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00725.html (11,893 bytes)

26. [TowerTalk] visit in LA dusring ARRL CW - OK1RI (score: 1)
Author: jirka@jimaz.cz (Jiri Sanda)
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 23:51:43 +-100
I happen to be north of LA next Sunday. I would be most interested to join some MS - MM operation in the area to hear how the bands look from there. I do hope my call is known well enough to know who
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00412.html (6,934 bytes)

27. [TowerTalk] RE: Regarding your QRO 2500dx (score: 1)
Author: jirka@jimaz.cz (Jiri Sanda)
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 08:27:39 +-100
Hi Jens, I will never sort the problems with Ray. I have sorted all the problems by myself after 6 and or 7 failures of the device (I have two pieces). Just a small remark. Take universal multimeter
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00619.html (8,751 bytes)

28. [TowerTalk] RE: Regarding your QRO 2500dx (score: 1)
Author: jirka@jimaz.cz (Jiri Sanda)
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 23:54:51 +-100
Hello Jens, OK on your comment. Here is my explanation. Recommended voltages are : Cathode almost on the ground - recommended up to 10 Volts - maximum 100 Volts - at QRO - 120 Volts. Screen grid maxi
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00620.html (13,657 bytes)

29. [TowerTalk] W2PV (score: 1)
Author: jirka@jimaz.cz (Jiri Sanda)
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 00:33:52 +-100
Hello Bruce, It used to be great book in it's time and Jim has shown a way to the future but it is already 20 years and fortunately the time has brought us a lot more knowledge. I do not believe it i
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00214.html (6,770 bytes)

30. [TowerTalk] Delta-loop - long. (score: 1)
Author: jirka@jimaz.cz (Jiri Sanda)
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 1998 00:40:31 +-100
I respond to the discussion on vertically polarized deltaloops on ANT-modeling reflector. I respond here since I feel it might be interesting to wider forum and as I have seen the "talking" audience
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-01/msg00528.html (12,257 bytes)

31. [TowerTalk] 75m 2-el Delta Loops (score: 1)
Author: jirka@jimaz.cz (Jiri Sanda)
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 22:25:21 +-100
You can find my long E-mail explaining all those matters in the archives of towertalk about 3 weeks back 73 ! Jiri Ok1RI I am planning to build a 2-el 75mtr delta quad. The plan so far is to use an o
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00738.html (8,216 bytes)

32. [TowerTalk] Installing & de-Installing big Yagis (score: 1)
Author: jirka@jimaz.cz (Jiri Sanda)
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 00:55:01 +-100
If we are in this category of discussion another option is to build completely free standing 52 m. tower with no guy wires - like I have - and than simply move the full size 4 el. 40 (well over 500 l
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00739.html (13,541 bytes)

33. [TowerTalk] more - Precip static (score: 1)
Author: jirka@jimaz.cz (Jiri Sanda)
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 23:45:57 +-100
<< You can find practical examples all over the world that support what I say. One is on high tension lines, where a round very smooth ring or ball is used to reduce corona from bolts and other hardw
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00740.html (8,554 bytes)

34. [TowerTalk] High Antenna (score: 1)
Author: jirka@jimaz.cz (Jiri Sanda)
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 1997 22:50:56 +0100
Hello, I also want to come with few comments on the antenna height. We (me + OK1RF) do have here two antennas for 20m, one in 24m and one on different tower in 52m above the ground. As a rule of a th
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00198.html (8,776 bytes)

35. No subject (score: 1)
Author: jirka@jimaz.cz (Jiri Sanda)
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 1997 00:08:40 +0200
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> I question whether you have a "runnable" frequency by simply nulling out someone on the backside. YOU may no longer hear them, but the folks y
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00100.html (8,591 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu