Mail Archive Search: <+from:hwardsil@WOLFENET.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:hwardsil@WOLFENET.com: 72 ]

Total 72 documents matching your query.

21. [TowerTalk] Tuner Loss - Do Not Panic (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 15:04:20 -0800 (PST); Hold the phone, guys... Almost any tuner can be put in a situation where it is trying to match extreme loads. In these cases, efficiency will be less than if it's trying to perform an "easy" match.; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00338.html (11,848 bytes)
22. [TowerTalk] SO-239 Source (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 16:56:54 -0800 (PST); Hi all - I'm looking for a good price on a bag of SO-239's. Silver plated with Teflon insulator (not sure I need the gold contact - this is getting to be like the goofy hi-fi market) and either 4-hol; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00402.html (7,049 bytes)
23. [TowerTalk] HAM II Schematic Needed (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 13:23:04 -0700 (PDT); Anybody out there have a manual from which they can send me a copy of the schematic? A fax would be just swell. Let me know and I'll shoot you the number. Thanks in advance - just reply to me, not th; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00258.html (6,986 bytes)
24. [TowerTalk] Thanks! HamII Schematic Received (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 07:29:27 -0700 (PDT); Much obliged to all that replied/offered/scanned...all is well! 73, Ward N0AX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests:; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00274.html (6,870 bytes)
25. [TowerTalk] ARB Tests (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 13:18:02 -0700 (PDT); Not only is this test mentioned, it's included in the report as an Appendix and the reader is directed to it in the text. 73, Ward N0AX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Sub; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-06/msg00250.html (7,666 bytes)
26. [TowerTalk] MEASUREMENTS (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 22:17:18 -0700 (PDT); To answer both questions at once - it's a question of relative difference and K2AV addressed this well. If we were testing a combination of quads, logs, yagis, and something else, then I would not e; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-06/msg00314.html (9,272 bytes)
27. [TowerTalk] Opinions? Gem Quad element wire (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 06:53:16 -0800 (PST); It holds up fine with the exception of at the feedpoints. Mine has been up for about five years without major troubles. I have had to replace the black tie-wraps once due to aging. Attaching coax to; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00228.html (8,530 bytes)
28. [TowerTalk] Invisible Fence (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 07:20:49 -0700 (PDT); Gee, a whole new concept to go along with "chirp". "Bark", maybe? Or "Yip"? BOW wow WOW wow! WOW WOW wow WOW! 73, Ward N0AX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: to; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00770.html (8,079 bytes)
29. [TowerTalk] 2.2dBi vs dBd (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Sun, 19 Jul 1998 17:34:17 -0700 (PDT); Thanks! The 2.2dB correction between dBi and dBd should *NOT* be made to the figures in our report. I discuss that correction only to the extent that manufacturers may include it in their published; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00562.html (10,059 bytes)
30. [TowerTalk] More dBi/dBd (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Sun, 19 Jul 1998 18:17:58 -0700 (PDT); Tom is, of course, correct. The exact reference in the report is as follows: "At certain vertical angles and distances from the antenna, energy reflected from the ground may constructively add to the; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00563.html (9,497 bytes)
31. [TowerTalk] Gain vs. VSWR vs. Feedline Loss (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 12:22:31 -0700 (PDT); Gain is not VSWR is not Feedline Loss. They are three completely separate issues. Doug's point is taken from the overall *system* point of view whereby net effectiveness is reduced by high VSWR. Poss; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00634.html (10,220 bytes)
32. [TowerTalk] Systems vs. Components (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 19:59:35 -0700 (PDT); I agree that varying any one of the three parameters will result in variation in received signal strength, assuming that VSWR affects transmitter output (not always true). However, they are all indep; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00657.html (10,283 bytes)
33. [TowerTalk] TH-7 Test Results (score: 1): Author: Ward Silver <hwardsil@WOLFENET.com> (Ward Silver); Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 20:30:47 -0700 (PDT); Without including the entire discussion... This is a valid question - why, even with high VSWR, did we include the TH-7 and TH-6/7 data? The suspicious thing about the 10-meter VSWR was not so much t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00659.html (11,092 bytes)
34. [TowerTalk] Antenna Test Talk Show (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 06:34:51 -0700 (PDT); Yeah, I was getting tired of actually USING an antenna, anyway :-) 73, Ward N0AX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative reques; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00668.html (7,429 bytes)
35. [TowerTalk] Antenna Gain vs. VSWR (score: 1): Author: Ward Silver <hwardsil@WOLFENET.com> (Ward Silver); Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 07:55:55 -0700 (PDT); I think there is some confusion on nomenclature. I disagree that VSWR affects antenna gain, but agree that VSWR affects *system efficiency*. Antenna gain is only a function of antenna geometry. Syste; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00675.html (9,480 bytes)
36. [TowerTalk] An Interesting Experiment (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 11:49:40 -0700 (PDT); It's a darn good thing that Lewis Carroll never learned about transmission lines... Actually, this is an easy one - ALL of the power is eventually dissipated by the load, but in an infinite amount o; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00691.html (9,304 bytes)
37. [TowerTalk] An Interesting Experiment (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 11:52:21 -0700 (PDT); Yup. Although some of 'em is mighty tiny... 73, Ward N0AX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00692.html (8,161 bytes)
38. [TowerTalk] KH7M's Concerns about Groundwave (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 18:55:10 -0700 (PDT); I keep checking the mailbox, but my helicopter kit hasn't shown up yet :-) My personal *opinion* is that the results do include some groundwave energy, along with a fair amount of energy scattered fr; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00720.html (7,862 bytes)
39. [TowerTalk] Re2. Further Clarification Of Feed System Issues (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 19:01:40 -0700 (PDT); Yes, but it's a composite of the several items that should be addressed separately. Minor - you would have to have a mighty leaky setup for this to be significant. Eh? I think you mean imposed "BY"; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00723.html (10,151 bytes)
40. [TowerTalk] KH7M's Concerns about Groundwave (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1998 21:44:19 -0700 (PDT); I spent most of two years instrumenting twin-engine aircraft for airborne chemistry experiments. What an interesting job! But, no...I politely decline the offer to put together an airborne field-str; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00846.html (7,796 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]