Mail Archive Search: <+from:g3vbl@netcomuk.co.uk>

Results:

References: [ +from:g3vbl@netcomuk.co.uk: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] quads (score: 1): Author: g3vbl@netcomuk.co.uk (Chris Pedder); Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 16:02:05 +0000; Makes you wonder how much of the 'razor' was in the shack! 73 Chris -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQ; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00246.html (8,555 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] refurbish a Thrust bearing ? (score: 1): Author: g3vbl@netcomuk.co.uk (Chris Pedder); Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1998 20:57:18 +0000; Although I am not an engineer (I'm a mathematician by training) I heartily agree with Dave. Where I do disagree with you guys on the other side of the pond is in the correct use of a 'thrust' bearing; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00307.html (10,461 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Thrust bearings (score: 1): Author: g3vbl@netcomuk.co.uk (Chris Pedder); Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1998 18:16:53 +0100; Hi, In the 'Mother Country' the definition of THRUST may not be the same as that used in the 'Colonies'. The Oxford English Dictionary regards thrust, in a mechanical sense, as being 'A pushing force; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00317.html (8,805 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Re: [CQ-Contest] Magnetic Declination (score: 1): Author: g3vbl@netcomuk.co.uk (Chris Pedder); Date: Wed, 02 Jul 1997 11:54:28 +0100; Hi Frank, As I recall there isn't any problem with the sun down there, but at local noon there isn't much shadow to work with. 73, Chris ________________________________________ Chris Pedder G3VBL/8P; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00053.html (7,864 bytes)
5. Tower Ratings - Stupid Question (score: 1): Author: g3vbl@netcomuk.co.uk (Chris Pedder); Date: Sun, 22 Dec 1996 10:55:48 GMT; Comments about crank-up towers are always of interest because it is probably fair to say that here in England they are the type of tower most used. There are many reasons for this, not least of which; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00397.html (12,100 bytes)
6. Crankup-tiltover towers (score: 1): Author: g3vbl@netcomuk.co.uk (Chris Pedder); Date: Tue, 06 Aug 1996 22:09:40 -0700; Hi, In U.K. I would guess that a crankup-tiltover tower was more popular than any other. I would not care to put a lightweight tribander on top of some of them as I do not have too much confidence in; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-08/msg00065.html (7,972 bytes)
7. Yaesu Rotors (score: 1): Author: g3vbl@netcomuk.co.uk (Chris Pedder); Date: Thu, 08 Aug 1996 08:19:36 -0700; As I remember, and unfortunately I do not have the relevant document to hand, Emoto are one of the few (only?) rotor manufacturers who, in addition to specifying wind area for their products, also sp; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-08/msg00091.html (8,767 bytes)
8. crank up tower loads: was wind force design criteria (score: 1): Author: g3vbl@netcomuk.co.uk (Chris Pedder); Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 22:17:10 -0700; It is some time since I did the calculations for my motorised tower system, but 50 minutes does seem quite ridiculous. I calculated the 'work done' in raising the tower from the nested position to fu; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-08/msg00141.html (8,722 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]