Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ethan@ravenscall.net: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] KSYZ Tower Collapse (score: 1)
Author: Ethan <ethan@ravenscall.net>
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 13:20:50 -0500
A local radio station in my area (WNBY AM & FM)lost their tower last winter when someone pulling a snowmobile trailer was turning around in their parking lot and caught one of the guy anchors with th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00254.html (7,526 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Pucker Power (score: 1)
Author: Ethan <ethan@ravenscall.net>
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 13:36:03 -0500
I do commercial tower work, and I would definitely recommend a hard hat and long pants. But one thing I will not do is ride a crane! I can control what I do on a tower, but I have absolutely no contr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00255.html (8,351 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] KSYZ Tower Collapse (score: 1)
Author: Ethan <ethan@ravenscall.net>
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:49:15 -0500
Yes, you could break a guy and not take out the tower, but in this case (WNBY) I believe it broke the guy anchor. There were only three anchors for the whole tower, with all the guys for one side of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00260.html (9,559 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25G Section question (score: 1)
Author: Ethan <ethan@ravenscall.net>
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 15:05:27 -0500
Most likely you'll find that one or more of the legs have been bent in at the top. If this is a new section (never installed) then there's a chance it was a manufacturing defect. I have run into new
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00266.html (8,316 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Inspect Your Boom to Mast Plates! (score: 1)
Author: Ethan <ethan@ravenscall.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 04:48:23 -0500
This is one reason to use heavy galvanized steel plate instead of aluminum. There's just too much stress on these plates to use anything which fatigues easily. Ethan KC8HES __________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00325.html (7,569 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Safe (?) Climbing Practices (score: 1)
Author: Ethan <ethan@ravenscall.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 05:18:56 -0500
Funny! Yes, it's almost that bad... but there is some good advice in that BLM document linked to above. You just have to pick it out of the rest of the bureaucratic junk. My advice on tower climbing:
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00326.html (9,769 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 Bolts Needed (score: 1)
Author: Ethan <ethan@ravenscall.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 04:55:10 -0500
Rohn tower bolts can be found in many hardware stores. Use grade 5, fine-thread zinc-plated bolts, 1.5" long, three 1/4" and three 5/16" bolts per section. This is exactly what Rohn has shipped with
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00100.html (7,667 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 Bolts Needed (score: 1)
Author: Ethan <ethan@ravenscall.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 05:22:16 -0500
True, a lot depends on conditions. And 25G less than 50 feet is very strong and can take a lot of punishment, even having joints not tightened correctly. I have climbed towers with loose joints above
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00132.html (8,375 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 bolts (score: 1)
Author: Ethan <ethan@ravenscall.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 11:09:42 -0500
Rohn has never, as far as I know, used hot-dip galvanized bolts for their 25G towers. Galvanized bolts would have to have greater tolerances to accommodate the zinc, and that likely would weaken such
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00155.html (10,331 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Amphenol connectors (score: 1)
Author: Ethan <ethan@ravenscall.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 01:23:32 -0500
I've used several different brands of connectors on 1/2" Heliax, and the assembly instructions are all pretty similar, but the specifics vary. Basically you need to trim the cable so a small length o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00312.html (8,393 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] re Hardline connectors (score: 1)
Author: Ethan <ethan@ravenscall.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 05:26:11 -0500
<SNIP> Since this wasn't pointed out very well, I thought I should mention it. Bear in mind that this is 75 ohm smooth aluminum CATV hardline, the type commonly found on poles or buried in front of y
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00387.html (8,959 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Commercial towers and lightning (score: 1)
Author: Ethan <ethan@ravenscall.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:20:25 -0400
Commercial towers use lightning rods quite often, though not always. There are almost always antennas at the top of the tower, simply because that's the only position that's not partly shielded by th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00678.html (10,157 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] GIN POLE RECOMMENDATIONS (score: 1)
Author: Ethan <ethan@ravenscall.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:33:14 -0400
Yes, be careful! Also, use the right gin pole for the job, attach it among the tower braces, and never lift more than one section at a time! People have been killed while attempting to take shortcuts
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00679.html (9,494 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] protection from UV (and chewing by critters) (score: 1)
Author: Ethan <ethan@ravenscall.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:26:09 -0400
Careful, when you use pipe that way you don't have any vertical support for your cables in the pipe. The full length of the cable hangs from whatever support you have at the top, and depending on the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00760.html (8,117 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Age Old Question (score: 1)
Author: Ethan <ethan@ravenscall.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:38:23 -0400
Electrical tape is by far better. Even UV cable ties will deteriorate in a few years. I've seen towers where you could stand at the bottom of the tower, grab a feedline and pull out, and have all the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00761.html (8,897 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] Use of tape to secure cables to towers....notalways a good idea (score: 1)
Author: Ethan <ethan@ravenscall.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 05:04:16 -0400
Now I've taken old tape off towers and found bright shiny zinc underneath. I suppose that's where the YMMV comes in! Anyway, thanks for mentioning that. It may be that in certain environments (perhap
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00765.html (8,383 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Safe Climbing was Re: Roswell Tower Accident (score: 1)
Author: Ethan <ethan@ravenscall.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:10:36 -0400
I can attest to the truth of this. The only time I've ever discovered myself disconnecting the last line from the tower while more than a few feet above the ground was when I was descending and tired
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00717.html (10,877 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] Roswell Tower Accident (score: 1)
Author: Ethan <ethan@ravenscall.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:07:18 -0400
Doug Renwick wrote: IMO if you can't free climb a tower then maybe you shouldn't be climbing at all. One or preferably two connections at the work level is advised. Do not rush. Test your connection
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00718.html (10,377 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] Roswell Tower Accident (score: 1)
Author: Ethan <ethan@ravenscall.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:20:06 -0400
Doug Renwick wrote: If this description of the fatal event is correct then one possibility is that being belted-in in his decent may have contributed to his fall. If he used both hands to unhook his
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00719.html (10,202 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower accident, (score: 1)
Author: Ethan <ethan@ravenscall.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:40:45 -0400
It's because of the simple fact that even the professionals are not following all the proper safety procedures. They may be trained and certified, but they then set all that aside and use unsafe proc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00720.html (9,368 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu