Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dhblake@yahoo.com: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] [CQ-Contest] NAQP CW + Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: David Blake <dhblake@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:54:20 -0800 (PST)
Lets just go back to no computers allowed, no internet spots no computer dupe checking -- big paper dupe sheets, etc. HI -- GL 73 Hny/MX Dave N4DB The rule is now LESS clear because Skimmer is mentio
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00355.html (16,030 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Multi-band dipoles (score: 1)
Author: David Blake <dhblake@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
Really? For what B&W is asking for their wire antennas they should guarantee you #1 Honor Roll!! Perhaps the inefficiency is in either the particular installation or the operating skills of the owner
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-04/msg00362.html (10,118 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Antennas for 80m (score: 1)
Author: David Blake <dhblake@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 09:13:57 -0700 (PDT)
I used this setup while in Ohio with limited space. I dont know why or how it worked as well as it did on the low bands. The lengths are approximate. On 80/75M the antenna was less than 2:1 SWR from
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-04/msg00409.html (9,647 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Recognize this tower? (score: 1)
Author: David Blake <dhblake@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
I have never had an antenna higher than 50 feet.  I have worked all countries,  more than 300 countries on 6 bands, all 40 zones on 6 bands, DXCC 352 countries, etc, etc.  Probably many here have bee
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-09/msg00161.html (10,237 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] 15 meter yagi height for 6000 miles (score: 1)
Author: David Blake <dhblake@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 09:39:57 -0800 (PST)
John et al All this may be true to some extent but the majority of us don't have the option of stacked HF yagis at 90'  HI. I have never had an tower higher than 48 feet yet somehow have managed to w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00044.html (12,899 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Recommendation (score: 1)
Author: David Blake <dhblake@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 11:06:45 -0800 (PST)
There are some who will disagree but my vote goes strongly for the Mosley.  I had a Mosley PRO67B up in severe storm and ice prone central Ohio for 15 years.  During that time I managed DXCC Honor Ro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-01/msg00351.html (11,859 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] One more dipole-balun question (score: 1)
Author: David Blake <dhblake@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 09:45:40 -0700 (PDT)
are we talking about a G5RV or a Windom or both?  I've had some success with both on the low bands especially (160 80 40M). 73 Dave N4DB Off-center fed antennas are a really bad idea, primarily becau
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-06/msg00043.html (8,997 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m OCF etc (score: 1)
Author: David Blake <dhblake@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 12:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
Last October I put up a 160M OCF and could not be happier.  I consider myself a serious DXer on a budget.  Over the past 58 years I have tried a lot of antennas and for the low bands this is the best
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-06/msg00085.html (10,527 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Penetrox/Noalox vs. Anti-seize compound (score: 1)
Author: David Blake <dhblake@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:05:45 -0700 (PDT)
I used Penetrox supplied by Mosley and had their beams up for over 44 years.  I also used Penetrox on Rohn 25G and on Heigths aluminum tower sections.  These beams and towers were taken down and reas
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00505.html (11,971 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] : 40 meter rotating dipole question (score: 1)
Author: David Blake <dhblake@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 09:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
Mosley trap 40 meter elements effective.  I had the Mosley TA40KR 40 meter add on kit on an old TA33 and worked over 200 DXCC on 40M with it at less than 50 feet.  I then moved from Virginia to Ohio
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00036.html (11,543 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: screw anchors (was Welding Rebar) (score: 1)
Author: David Blake <dhblake@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 06:05:04 -0800 (PST)
I put up a 50ft Rohn 25G tower in 1971 using used 25G sections.  I bought Rohn screw in anchors and used no concrete, but a Rohn BP25 baseplate (no longer sold).  Took this tower down in1987 everythi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-01/msg00108.html (16,000 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Screw Anchor removal (score: 1)
Author: David Blake <dhblake@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 14:22:43 -0800 (PST)
Not too difficult, just starting a screw --  I use a 4 foot long pipe thru the eye and start turning.  They actually go in easier than you would think.  Of course as it gets deeper it becomes more di
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-01/msg00122.html (9,656 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] TT bounces (score: 1)
Author: David Blake <dhblake@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 11:56:53 -0700 (PDT)
Very same thing here too Gary  --  what does excessive bounces ??  Heck I havent posted anything in a long time. Are they saying they are sending messages to me and they are bouncing?  The better che
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-04/msg00295.html (12,162 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] TT bounces (score: 1)
Author: David Blake <dhblake@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 13:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
I have a yahoo account,  and also an one that was given to me by AT&T.  My att.com account goes thru a yahoo server. Dave -N4DB- Gmail or others seem to be doing a better job with service and securit
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-04/msg00299.html (14,317 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu