Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat@outlook.com: 93 ]

Total 93 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TowerTalk] Cadweld vs clamps (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 20:38:44 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: If the above were true, the NEC would mandate exothermic bonding instead of clamps. They don't. Clamps work. A lot of old wives' tales floating around he
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-10/msg00321.html (9,246 bytes)

42. Re: [TowerTalk] Cadweld vs clamps (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 20:42:21 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I don't do wild goose chases. If you have something to say, say it. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ ______________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-10/msg00322.html (9,164 bytes)

43. Re: [TowerTalk] Cadweld vs clamps (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 12:43:25 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: With all due respect, those two statements defy common sense. First, properly tightened bolts do not come loose except perhaps with vibration, which of c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-10/msg00340.html (9,667 bytes)

44. Re: [TowerTalk] Cadweld vs clamps (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 16:13:16 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Pray tell, what else do you have connected to the hot side of the ground rod? When lightning is near I disconnect everything. And what about the resistan
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-10/msg00345.html (10,049 bytes)

45. Re: [TowerTalk] Cadweld vs clamps (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 16:35:31 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: And therein lies the problem. Multiple grounds which are physically separate but which are wired together. That is asking for trouble and that is why the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-10/msg00347.html (10,183 bytes)

46. Re: [TowerTalk] Cadweld vs clamps (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 16:43:37 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I think I understand what you meant by "coming loose". I took that to mean the bolts unscrewed themselves. I think what you meant was they corroded away
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-10/msg00349.html (9,115 bytes)

47. Re: [TowerTalk] Cadweld vs clamps (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 13:29:59 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Correct. At first I was wondering but as several have pointed out, the NEC says properly installed clamps are sufficient. In view of Cadweld's higher cos
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-10/msg00364.html (10,387 bytes)

48. Re: [TowerTalk] Adhesive lined heat shrink for connectors (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 17:10:13 -0800
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: On eBay, you could search for "adhesive heat shrink". Currently there are 1,575 listings. I just started using the 1/2 inch size myself for coax. So far,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-11/msg00053.html (8,754 bytes)

49. Re: [TowerTalk] RTV (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 15:34:33 -0800
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Squeeze out a dab and smell it. What you DON'T want is the smell of acetic acid, i.e. vinegar. That would be corrosive. 73, Bill W6WRT __________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-11/msg00086.html (8,681 bytes)

50. Re: [TowerTalk] RTV where to find and (getting Long Life) (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 22:20:03 -0800
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Excellent idea. For years I have saved glass jars and now I know why. The tall thin ones that green olives come in would be perfect, not to mention givin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-11/msg00095.html (9,368 bytes)

51. Re: [TowerTalk] Connectorizing rotator cables (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 09:28:21 -0800
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Lightning magnet. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list T
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-11/msg00115.html (8,609 bytes)

52. Re: [TowerTalk] Regarding Rohn HDBX48 tower spec's. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 01:53:16 -0800
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: The first tower I ever climbed was an HDBX48 and I remember it well. Being a total newbie at tower climbing, about halfway up I thought I was going to di
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-11/msg00226.html (8,123 bytes)

53. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 meter antenna thoughts. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 07:35:08 -0800
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Inverted Vees work very well. With the apex at about 1/4 wave and about 90 degrees between the legs, they are almost perfectly omnidirectional. 73, Bill
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-11/msg00229.html (7,399 bytes)

54. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 meter antenna thoughts. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:34:31 -0800
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: True if you're working DX, but for local Qs out to a few hundred miles or so a cloud warmer is what you want. 160 meters nearly always reflects vertical
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-11/msg00231.html (7,659 bytes)

55. [TowerTalk] Some advice about crimp ;type coax connectors (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 18:55:43 -0800
I haven't seen this discussed before so I thought I'd throw in my 2 cents. Might help someone. I love crimp type coax connectors. Done right, they are faster and more reliable than solder type. I wil
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-11/msg00248.html (8,548 bytes)

56. [TowerTalk] PowerPole connectors (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:00:00 -0800
What am I missing about PowerPole connectors? It seems to me to be a solution in search of a problem. What do they do that you can't do with a crimp type ring terminal and a screw type terminal strip
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-11/msg00257.html (8,325 bytes)

57. Re: [TowerTalk] PowerPole connectors (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:49:48 -0800
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Couldn't you do the same with the spade type male and female connectors that have been around for decades at a fraction of the cost? Use the male for the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-11/msg00265.html (9,378 bytes)

58. Re: [TowerTalk] PowerPole connectors (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:53:10 -0800
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: If you don't like ring terminals, use the spade type male and female connectors. Male for negative source, female for positive source. Can't plug them in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-11/msg00267.html (8,767 bytes)

59. Re: [TowerTalk] PowerPole connectors (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:56:49 -0800
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: If you want a no-tool connector, use the spade type male and female crimp connectors that have been available for decades. Cheap, easy and foolproof. I p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-11/msg00269.html (9,264 bytes)

60. Re: [TowerTalk] PowerPole connectors (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 12:47:20 -0800
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I'm not against standardization, I just don't think PP is the best answer, mainly because they are proprietary and overpriced. If they become generic and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-11/msg00276.html (9,541 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu