Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:cpwendling@yahoo.com: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] accident (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wendling <cpwendling@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
Tightly tensioned guy wires can put many times the compressive load of a single climber on a tower. If a tower were suspect, (or maybe just as a good precaution), the guy wires should be tensioned an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00771.html (8,343 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Poor man's guy wire tension guage (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wendling <cpwendling@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
Here's another way to measure the tension in you guy wires, and all you need is a small tape recorder and 3 ft piece of 2 by 4 lumber. Cut two small blocks off the ends of the 2x4, and nail them to t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00480.html (8,576 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Poor mans tension guage: correction (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wendling <cpwendling@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
Sorry for the math error in my origianl post, when I hit the send key, the light came on ;>). Doubling the tension does not double the frequency. You need to have 4 times the tension to double the fr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00482.html (7,316 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Tower section wind loads (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wendling <cpwendling@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:27:11 -0700 (PDT)
Bill, I don't question that the numbers you got from the 1976 Rohn catalog are not faithfull reproductions, perhaps I just don't understand their interpretation. projection area" of one section of Ro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00542.html (7,910 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Base bolt depth in existing concrete (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wendling <cpwendling@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 07:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
Vic, Check out the epoxy's at Marine Tek. I've used them, and they are very good, especially for outdoor applications with lots of moisture. As far as bolt depth, go as deep as you practically can. W
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00036.html (7,842 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Diffraction Reciprocity (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wendling <cpwendling@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 06:50:33 -0800 (PST)
Well, why not wade into this interesting topic? Would have sooner, but spent most of the weekend working the SS CW contest with W8RJL's group under the K4IX call. Had a clean sweep and had a blast! L
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-11/msg00106.html (8,522 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] Reciprocity and diffraction (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wendling <cpwendling@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 11:26:53 -0800 (PST)
Several gentlemen have pointed out that I mistakenly said the radius of curvature of the transmitted wavefront gets smaller as the signal emanates from the antenna. I apologize for the slip. I should
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-11/msg00122.html (8,712 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Windload at 90 mph (was: Plumbing a tower) (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wendling <cpwendling@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:00:35 -0800 (PST)
Clay, Yes, you're in the ballpark. The formula for drag is 1/2* rho*velocity-squared*frontal-area*coefficient-of-drag. I calculate about 26 lbs force for 90 mph for 1 sq-ft frontal projection area. T
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00488.html (10,092 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Windload at 90 mph (was: Plumbing a tower) (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wendling <cpwendling@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:09:46 -0800 (PST)
Jim, Yes, I figured you used a Cd of 1.0, which is a reasonable starting place. Nice to know there is another "aero" guy on the towertalk list. Below is a link to some very good information on commun
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00491.html (9,825 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Windload at 90 mph (was: Plumbing a tower) (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wendling <cpwendling@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 08:46:57 -0800 (PST)
Clay, Great question! Difficult answer. I'm assuming that the projected areas are the same for both the 1/2" and 2" tubing in your question. It may be counter-intuitive, but many times the smaller di
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00495.html (12,510 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Windload at 90 mph (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wendling <cpwendling@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:21:02 -0800 (PST)
The tricky thing, of course, is that structural members for ham towers in typical winds are in that horrible Reynolds number regime around 100,000 where the Cd varies so quickly (and varies a lot dep
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00496.html (7,627 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Using a dip meter (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wendling <cpwendling@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
Jeff, The dip meter is a very versatile instrument, with very many uses. I own several makes, and use them regularly. Some of the applications are: 1) Receiver adjustments 2) Transmitter adjustments
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00383.html (8,290 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Happy news for a change (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wendling <cpwendling@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:51:27 -0700 (PDT)
Just curious as to why 55 ft was chosen.  Seems like 65ft (about 1 wavelength on 20m) which would allow a good low angle radiation pattern on 14Mhz, would be better for hams.  I wonder if they though
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00286.html (9,594 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Red-Tailed Hawks (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wendling <cpwendling@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 06:23:38 -0800 (PST)
Does anyone have experience with red-tailed hawks...? Thanks, Doug K4AC Doug, While hang gliding in the Appalachians west of Charlottsville, VA, there have been many occasions when a Red Tail Hawk wo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00103.html (9,441 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] coax stubs /bandpass filter (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wendling <cpwendling@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:42:58 -0700 (PDT)
Jim, Great info on stubs, and very timely given that Field Day is only 2 1/2 months away. A couple of quick questions: Does a higher "Q" coax yield more attenuation, all other things being equal? I k
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-03/msg00614.html (10,215 bytes)

16. [TowerTalk] More stubs and filters (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wendling <cpwendling@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 06:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
Suppose I'm at Field Day, operating CW on 40m.Right next to me, a station is operating on 20m.I could use a stub to attenuate him. I could use a lumped element filterin my transmission line pre-tuned
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-03/msg00691.html (7,329 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu