Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ccc@space.mit.edu: 187 ]

Total 187 documents matching your query.

81. [Towertalk] Varmints (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 22:05:47 -0500
1. See the recent TowerTalk thread on electric fences. :-) 2. Put the cable in conduit/pipe. A master electrician with decades of experience with buried cables recently told me that PVC conduit keeps
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00081.html (8,181 bytes)

82. [Towertalk] balun measurements (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 13:10:11 -0500
The questions you asked are so broad that it'd take a big textbook to answer them, and AFAIK the book you would need does not exist. I think that your only hope is to post a very specific question, a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00183.html (7,806 bytes)

83. [Towertalk] Need UNUN help (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 13:15:45 -0500
I'd live with the mismatch, which seems trivial. Parallel two 75-ohm lines to cut your loss further, if 38-ohm line would suit you better. -Chuck, W1HIS
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00184.html (6,714 bytes)

84. [Towertalk] Frying doesn't hurt ferrite. (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 18:16:54 -0500
An astute Towertalk reader asked me off-list whether the ferrite that I had salvaged from my burned-out common-mode choke/balun was still good. He said he had read that frying ferrite ruins it. I rep
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00194.html (9,109 bytes)

85. [Towertalk] Frying doesn't hurt ferrite. (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 20:53:42 -0500
Or glued them back together, using rubber bands to clamp them tightly while the glue set, to minimize the gap. -Chuck, W1HIS
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00198.html (7,535 bytes)

86. [Towertalk] Frying doesn't hurt ferrite. (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 22:27:56 -0500
You are absolutely correct, and I knew it when I wrote what I did, which is why I hedged by writing that they do not retain **much** magnetism (in comparison with "hard" ferrites). I probably should
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00200.html (9,051 bytes)

87. [Towertalk] Gluing broken ferrite (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 10:46:47 -0500
Someone mentioned that he had discarded the pieces of a ferrite toroid that had broken in half (due to overheating); I suggested "glu[ing] them back together, using rubber bands to clamp them tightly
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00205.html (10,114 bytes)

88. [Towertalk] Salvaging ferrite cores (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 11:50:35 -0500
The large number of Towertalk posts relating to ferrite-core common-mode chokes, baluns, and transformers (which often are different names for the same thing) says that this is a mainstream topic. Ev
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00207.html (7,347 bytes)

89. [Towertalk] ICOM 706 MKIIG mobile interference problem (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 21:46:19 -0500
Start with common-mode RF chokes on your RF transmission line, both at the antenna end and at the transceiver end. See below for details. Also put RF chokes on all other cables connected to your tran
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00278.html (8,447 bytes)

90. [TowerTalk] static drainage (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Mon Jan 27 08:58:49 2003
Yes, very much so! An antenna (or part of an antenna, such as one-half of a dipole connected to the center-conductor of a coaxial feedline) left floating very easily acquires a (literally) staggering
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00448.html (8,002 bytes)

91. [TowerTalk] static drainage (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Mon Jan 27 09:53:19 2003
You don't need lightning to charge an antenna electrostatically. Precipitation can do it, and even dry wind. -Chuck, W1HIS
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00451.html (8,417 bytes)

92. [TowerTalk] Antenna static charging (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Mon Jan 27 23:15:06 2003
On armyradios today, from <Jim-M1-Radio@attbi.com>: NE, waterfront, mild wind (maybe 10 mph, snowing, mid 20's, very dry air, 150 foot long wire, #6 AWG: When disconnected from radio or ground, the s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00469.html (6,810 bytes)

93. [TowerTalk] Rising VSWR (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Tue Jan 28 08:44:02 2003
I have two RadioWorks type T-4 line isolators, both of which overheated while I was transmitting 1.5 kW. One caught fire. Dissection revealed that they were wound with 0.2-inch (o.d.) coaxial cable a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00475.html (9,093 bytes)

94. [TowerTalk] steve@netmakers.com (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Tue Jan 28 09:28:11 2003
Lately, every time I post a message to TowerTalk, I get back a couple of "nondelivery" error messages like the following one, relating to <steve@netmakers.com>. Am I the only TT subscriber getting th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00477.html (10,136 bytes)

95. [TowerTalk] RadioWorks line-isolator spec. (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Tue Jan 28 14:32:13 2003
About three years ago, suckered by RadioWorks' advertising which seemed to say that the common-mode-choking impedance of their so-called line isolator at 3.5 MHz was _extremely_ high, of the order of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00498.html (8,067 bytes)

96. [TowerTalk] Rising VSWR (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Tue Jan 28 14:58:07 2003
I'm having difficulty thinking of fields of human endeavor outside ham radio, where actual product performance is more substantially and consistently worse than advertised. So far I've been able to t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00500.html (9,056 bytes)

97. [TowerTalk] High-power antenna tuners (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Wed Jan 29 13:12:32 2003
I agree. Since the main purpose of a tuner is to accommodate mismatch, the advertised power ratings of tuners should logically include statements of the load impedances and frequencies for which the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00536.html (12,701 bytes)

98. [TowerTalk] Adjusting antenna tuners (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Wed Jan 29 13:47:52 2003
This wonderfully convenient method doesn't work for hams who live near AM broadcast antennas. The definition of "near" depends on a bunch of factors, obviously; but I can tell you that the 10-kW 1150
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00539.html (9,413 bytes)

99. [TowerTalk] Re: Ground rod material (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Wed Jan 29 13:50:50 2003
Where can one buy galvanized rods? Or should galvanized water pipe be used? -Chuck, W1HIS
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00540.html (7,816 bytes)

100. [TowerTalk] Antenna Coupler Capacitor Settings (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Fri Jan 31 18:41:02 2003
Here's how to determine when your C-L-C T-network antenna tuner's output capacitor (or if you choose, its input capacitor), is fully meshed -- without opening the box. You need a multimeter (like my
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00604.html (8,811 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu