Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ccc@space.mit.edu: 187 ]

Total 187 documents matching your query.

41. [TowerTalk] Common-mode current on feedline (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Thu Jun 26 14:02:34 2003
Here's an outline of my method. There's not much to it. First, my antenna is a doublet 30 meters (102 feet) long, like a G5RV. My tuners have been C-L-C "T" networks; these are high-pass filters. I s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-06/msg00492.html (12,696 bytes)

42. [TowerTalk] Holy Grail [was: Common-mode current on feed line] (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Thu Jun 26 14:34:32 2003
By "Holy Grail" I mean a * no-tune, * all-HF-band, and * full-legal-power (incl. negligible-loss) antenna-feedline system. -W1HIS. Dennis, K7FL, wrote: See the response to Howard K2HK that I posted a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-06/msg00495.html (8,680 bytes)

43. [TowerTalk] Professionals, was: Tower Climbing Business (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Fri Jun 27 09:15:33 2003
Thanks for contributing these two thoughtful, thought-provoking, and well-written pieces, Greg. -Chuck, W1HIS
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-06/msg00520.html (7,692 bytes)

44. [TowerTalk] Line Isolators (was: common mode chokes) (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Fri Jun 27 17:12:12 2003
(1) Don't put a Radio Works "Line Isolator" in the output line from a legal-limit HF power amp. It's unsafe, as I shall explain below. Also: (2) The common-mode choking impedances of these products a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-06/msg00528.html (12,634 bytes)

45. [TowerTalk] ferrites & fires (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Sat Jun 28 12:09:16 2003
No question. Most of the time I transmit between 10 and 15 watts. Only when conditions require it (just twice in the last month -- I just reviewed my log.) do I QRO to 100 or 200 W. Only when conditi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-06/msg00536.html (9,286 bytes)

46. [TowerTalk] ferrites & fires (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Sat Jun 28 16:21:48 2003
You're right; I meant SF6. A close friend, also a ham, developed high-voltage (about 1 MV, IIRC), DC, gas-filled, underground power-transmission lines -- first in the HV lab at MIT, then at two big i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-06/msg00540.html (8,171 bytes)

47. [TowerTalk] Antenna performance comparisons (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Wed May 7 15:39:29 2003
Ward Silver N0AX and others have reminded us that, whereas some antennas may _seem_ to be "low-noise" receiving antennas, often this is an illusion because the antenna has a great deal of _loss_. (Wh
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-05/msg00069.html (9,012 bytes)

48. [TowerTalk] Gap and EH Antennas (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Sun May 18 11:59:04 2003
If, as I suspect, the "EH" antenna of which you speak is the infamous crossed-field antenna, or "CFA", be warned that at best it's a big mistake, and at worst it's a hoax. The feedline to a CFA does
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-05/msg00195.html (8,126 bytes)

49. [TowerTalk] More on 75/80M Antennas (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Mon May 19 00:23:05 2003
Years ago at another QTH I had a similar situation. I noticed that the city had poured tar along so many cracks in the street that (1) a few more tar-covered cracks would not be noticed; and (2) all
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-05/msg00224.html (8,353 bytes)

50. [TowerTalk] More on 75/80M Antennas (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Mon May 19 14:21:30 2003
It worked like every other vertical: poorly in comparison with a horizontal antenna at the same height, except for local-area ground-wave propagation. I researched the topic of tree conductivity a fe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-05/msg00235.html (10,539 bytes)

51. [TowerTalk] 80M attic antenna (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Tue May 20 17:20:19 2003
An 80-m dipole that close to ground is virtually omnidirectional, so don't worry about what direction it runs. Just install it as high as possible, with the centermost portion as high and straight as
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-05/msg00261.html (7,916 bytes)

52. [TowerTalk] Feedline question (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Wed May 28 22:58:37 2003
The humidity of that air is probably not sufficiently low to prevent condensation within your feedline when the outside temperature is very low. You must reduce the "dew point" of that air safely bel
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-05/msg00366.html (7,622 bytes)

53. [TowerTalk] ...PRICELESS! (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Tue Apr 1 09:34:19 2003
*HOW* did that happen?! -Chuck, W1HIS
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00006.html (6,661 bytes)

54. [TowerTalk] baloon supported wire verticals (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Fri Apr 4 09:31:52 2003
I have experimented with balloon-supported wire antennas for 40 meters, but I believe that my conclusions apply equally to a 160-m antenna: 1. Use _Litz_ wire rather than solid or stranded wire, to m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00045.html (11,556 bytes)

55. [TowerTalk] baloon supported wire verticals (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Fri Apr 4 10:14:28 2003
No; but, if I did, I would minimize the weight of the feedline by Zepp and/or Windom feeding. Zepp feed uses a two-parallel-wire feedline, one-quarter-wave long, with one wire connected to the end of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00051.html (8,871 bytes)

56. [TowerTalk] OT: Location Location? (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Fri Apr 4 19:54:43 2003
I agree. I agree again. That's an understatement. Don't trust a real estate agent _at_all_ about this. No matter how clearly and absolutely and unequivocably I state, orally *and* in writing, that I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00066.html (7,884 bytes)

57. [TowerTalk] Location Location? (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Sat Apr 5 11:13:06 2003
At 8:30 AM -0500 4/5/03, a TowerTalker replied to me off-list: Please understand that my original comment and my forwarding of this one come not from a grudge against real-estate agents, but from a d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00074.html (7,558 bytes)

58. [TowerTalk] Location Location? (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Sat Apr 5 13:07:13 2003
"Maybe"?! Surely you jest. -Chuck, W1HIS
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00077.html (6,770 bytes)

59. [TowerTalk] Location location (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Sun Apr 6 16:28:57 2003
I'm sorry that I did not know what I should expect from Realtors, and that I relied on Realtors to tell me. I should have known not to listen to them. Thank you for confirming what I learned the hard
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00094.html (8,660 bytes)

60. [TowerTalk] Location location (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Sun Apr 6 17:39:58 2003
I was using three "buyer's" agents. In theory, they were working for me. However, because their compensation would be by commission, they were motivated to make a sale happen. A "buyer's" agent is al
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00098.html (9,005 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu