Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:bbowers@mozarks.com: 80 ]

Total 80 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TowerTalk] cable locating (score: 1)
Author: "Blake Bowers" <bbowers@mozarks.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 23:43:16 -0500
http://www.call811.com/ is now nationwide. They do not NORMALLY mark private lines, they only mark member utilities. They are paid by the utilities, and in some areas you may have 3 or more different
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00623.html (9,024 bytes)

62. Re: [TowerTalk] Underground Utilities (score: 1)
Author: "Blake Bowers" <bbowers@mozarks.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:53:31 -0500
It seems to vary with the provider. Don't take your organs to heaven, heaven knows we need them down here! Be an organ donor, sign your donor card today. _____________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00661.html (8,554 bytes)

63. Re: [TowerTalk] free climbing a 1700`tower (score: 1)
Author: "Blake Bowers" <bbowers@mozarks.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 15:05:16 -0500
IMHO, he achieved the idiot level when he advocates an illegal act - which free climbing in the commercial world is an illegal act. Don't take your organs to heaven, heaven knows we need them down he
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00472.html (9,484 bytes)

64. Re: [TowerTalk] free climbing a 1700`tower (score: 1)
Author: "Blake Bowers" <bbowers@mozarks.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 01:59:59 -0500
Because he is an idiot? Because he does not know any better? http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_id=10758&p_table=STANDARDS This is where many of his practices are shown to be not
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00481.html (10,479 bytes)

65. Re: [TowerTalk] free climbing a 1700`tower (score: 1)
Author: "Blake Bowers" <bbowers@mozarks.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 14:24:02 -0500
Seeing as we are discussing a US tower, US regulations, and a commercial situation, I really don't see what the need is to consider Canadian regulations, or at least for me to consider it as none of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00496.html (11,193 bytes)

66. Re: [TowerTalk] Free climbing a 1700' tower (score: 1)
Author: "Blake Bowers" <bbowers@mozarks.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 14:25:55 -0500
I second that. Kind of childish crap if you ask me. Don't take your organs to heaven, heaven knows we need them down here! Be an organ donor, sign your donor card today. -- Original Message -- From:
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00513.html (11,949 bytes)

67. Re: [TowerTalk] free climbing, etc. (score: 1)
Author: "Blake Bowers" <bbowers@mozarks.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:54:54 -0500
I am sure Dave Calder will recognize this right away, it is pretty common around many commercial tower sites, "NO JOB IS SO IMPORTANT AND NO SERVICE IS SO URGENT THAT WE CANNOT TAKE THE TIME TO PERFO
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00522.html (8,278 bytes)

68. [TowerTalk] Morning report Copper Theft (score: 1)
Author: "Blake Bowers" <bbowers@mozarks.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 08:53:02 -0500
chuckle - 1 million dollars worth of copper? Wow! http://www.mlive.com/news/flint/index.ssf/2010/09/copper_taken_from_communicatio.html Don't take your organs to heaven, heaven knows we need them do
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00608.html (6,855 bytes)

69. Re: [TowerTalk] Crimped PL-259's (score: 1)
Author: "Blake Bowers" <bbowers@mozarks.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 09:45:53 -0500
Wow. So I should return all these commercial two way radios I deal with that have SO-239 connectors on them for use with PL-259's to the manufacturers as being defective? Icom, Kenwood, etc use them
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-10/msg00127.html (8,266 bytes)

70. Re: [TowerTalk] Crimped PL-259's (score: 1)
Author: "Blake Bowers" <bbowers@mozarks.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:03:05 -0500
I was simply responding to the statement that they are almost never used except in amateur applications - a statement that is not correct. I can say though, servicing commercial LMR equipment since t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-10/msg00168.html (10,997 bytes)

71. Re: [TowerTalk] VHF 4 Bay Dipole Pattern (score: 1)
Author: "Blake Bowers" <bbowers@mozarks.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 10:23:38 -0500
http://www.repeater-builder.com/db/pdfs/db-224-data-sheet-(db).pdf Don't take your organs to heaven, heaven knows we need them down here! Be an organ donor, sign your donor card today. ______________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-10/msg00299.html (8,311 bytes)

72. Re: [TowerTalk] Concrete Base for Rohn SSV (score: 1)
Author: "Blake Bowers" <bbowers@mozarks.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 09:57:20 -0600
Self Supporters do fall, and it is not uncommon. A few BIG ones include, Missouri State Highway Patrol, Willow Springs troop G. American Telephone and Telegraph Long Lines, Bloomfield MO American Tel
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00244.html (7,621 bytes)

73. Re: [TowerTalk] Dang! Tower Problems (score: 1)
Author: "Blake Bowers" <bbowers@mozarks.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 21:38:07 -0500
I have no first hand experience with Trylon Titan Towers, most all of my towers are all carrier class and larger. So - take this for what it is worth. There is a LOT of discussion right now on some o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-04/msg00416.html (9,625 bytes)

74. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn - Spaulding Tower (score: 1)
Author: "Blake Bowers" <bbowers@mozarks.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:27:34 -0500
GACK!!!! I hope you are just planning on scrapping it out... These things were made to support VERY light TV antennas. Older Rohn. Don't take your organs to heaven, heaven knows we need them down her
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-06/msg00250.html (8,533 bytes)

75. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn - Spaulding Tower (score: 1)
Author: "Blake Bowers" <bbowers@mozarks.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:34:51 -0500
Do my eyes decieve me, or in picture 4, and to a lesser extent in picture 7, is there not a significant lean to the tower? Don't take your organs to heaven, heaven knows we need them down here! Be an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-06/msg00251.html (7,824 bytes)

76. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Leasing (score: 1)
Author: "Blake Bowers" <bbowers@mozarks.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 15:29:49 -0500
As a commercial tower owner, these are the things we look at. It must be on a written agreement. 1. The leasee MUST have insurance and include you on the certificate. 2. The leasee must provide a spe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-07/msg00118.html (9,718 bytes)

77. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Leasing (score: 1)
Author: "Blake Bowers" <bbowers@mozarks.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 17:06:59 -0500
It would not affect your FAA, just local planning/zoning/codes. Dealing with the FAA in my experience has been very easy, unlike most federal agencies. Don't take your organs to heaven, heaven knows
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-07/msg00120.html (8,622 bytes)

78. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Leasing (score: 1)
Author: "Blake Bowers" <bbowers@mozarks.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 08:19:53 -0500
When dealing with a Cellular carrier, you are correct, but remember this guy asked about a WISP. Typically underfunded, they are more prone to take action (install) then ask permission. And free spac
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-07/msg00133.html (9,542 bytes)

79. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Leasing (score: 1)
Author: "Blake Bowers" <bbowers@mozarks.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 17:52:34 -0500
For a non-commercial tower, or grain leg, that kind of site, most of them want to trade out service for the space. Don't take your organs to heaven, heaven knows we need them down here! Be an organ d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-07/msg00137.html (8,460 bytes)

80. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Leasing (score: 1)
Author: "Blake Bowers" <bbowers@mozarks.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:07:58 -0500
You know, I would consider doing a portion per month per subscriber, but no one has asked about it. I am more than happy to let a WISP get their start. Don't take your organs to heaven, heaven knows
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-07/msg00166.html (9,531 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]
This search system is powered by Namazu