Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:baycock@direcway.com: 150 ]

Total 150 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TowerTalk] YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS HAS BEEN ADDED TO MY WHITE LIST (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 22:28:57 -0500
Tom- MY OPINION- White lists cause more trouble than they solve. If someone that I have not pre-approved (because I have not heard from them before) wants to send me a message- how do they do it? The
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00557.html (9,680 bytes)

62. RE: [TowerTalk] YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS HAS BEEN ADDED TO MY WHITE LIST (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:55:51 -0500
Tom- One of the conflicting flaws in the current system is the interaction of the TowerTalk list defaults with the "WhiteList" system. With the default of Towertalks Reply to send only to the sender,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00585.html (9,115 bytes)

63. Re: [TowerTalk] TB-3 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 14:09:30 -0500
Why do you want a TB-3- Rohn used to sell a block of hardwood with a hole in it as a bearing. It works for most applications. Bill At 01:10 PM 10/8/2004 -0400, K8fu@aol.com wrote: Looking for a used
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00143.html (7,730 bytes)

64. Re: [TowerTalk] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 19:43:43 -0500
I have heard of using a sheet of coarse-grit "wet-or-Dry" sandpaper. Bill At 07:03 PM 10/10/2004 -0400, Joe Barnes wrote: awhile back someone posted something that they used to get more grip between
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00194.html (7,959 bytes)

65. [TowerTalk] Re: [Antennas] inline female coax connector? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 22:16:45 -0500
Two comments: 1. Yes, there is a cable-end equivalent to an SO 238, that matches to a PL 239. (I use them, but don't remember the designation) 2. I thought the myth of "High insertion loss" had been
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00330.html (10,191 bytes)

66. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: [Antennas] inline female coax connector? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 23:52:27 -0500
Another comment: Apparently I can't remember the designation of ANY Coax fitting. Sorry. At any rate, I use both Male and Female coax cable end fittings and "barrel" couplers of various lengths. Bill
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00331.html (9,768 bytes)

67. Re: [TowerTalk] Take off angles, VOACAP, etcf. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 06:44:49 -0500
Is my intuitive logic wrong? It seems to me that the antenna has nothing to do with the characteristics of the ionosphere; it only controls ones ability to accept and use the signals that are there.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00441.html (10,955 bytes)

68. Re: [TowerTalk] ARRL Handbooks... (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 15:17:44 -0500
I just got my copy of the new ARRL Handbook- While I have not had time to look at it much, I can tell you that the indexing is as bad as ever, and-- the name "Beverage" is not even in the index. (for
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00462.html (10,336 bytes)

69. Re: [TowerTalk] ARRL Handbooks... (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 22:12:59 -0500
Tom- I agree that it is an essential reference for Hams, especially me. ( I need all the help I can get). However, one of the main limitations of any reference is the index; if it's not listed there,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00481.html (12,054 bytes)

70. Re: [TowerTalk] Conduit ends? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 07:02:28 -0600
I note a lot of people recommending stainless steel or Bronze wool to seal the conduit ends. This is a good I dea, but only if you use rhe "Real Thing". After encountering rust on scrubbers that were
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00062.html (8,987 bytes)

71. Re: [TowerTalk] Polishing a plastic meter face to remove scratches? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 17:06:49 -0600
It's the Best!- I used it 45 years ago on sports cars. However- I think the spelling needs checking. Bill At 07:57 AM 11/12/2004 -0500, Randy wrote: Maguire's Plastic Polish works very well also...Av
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00368.html (9,774 bytes)

72. Re: [TowerTalk] Another Tailtwister question (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:31:31 -0600
Barry- I think the Cap is really a phase control in the reversing circuit, not a starting Cap.. The value may be more critical than for starting. Check the manual. Bill At 06:49 PM 11/29/2004 +0000,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00717.html (8,853 bytes)

73. RE: [TowerTalk] 60th Birthday (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 07:31:23 -0600
Yes, butt some handicaps are between the ears. At 01:49 PM 1/2/2005 -0500, W0UCE wrote: Jim: Some of the people riding around hamfests are handicapped... Jack W&Oslash;UCE Bill Aycock - W4BSG Woodvil
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00060.html (8,701 bytes)

74. Re: [TowerTalk] Re:BANISHMENT (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 07:09:49 -0600
Another puzzler- if he was banned, how did he post to the list? Bill At 10:02 PM 1/7/2005 -0500, Tom Rauch wrote: I'm mising something here. Why would behavior OFF any reflector shouldn't have anythi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00216.html (9,388 bytes)

75. [TowerTalk] Terrain Analysis (TA) (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 16:53:05 -0600
The program "TA" has been mentioned recently, and referenced as being in the ARRL Antenna book. Unfortunately, the version I have has no disk. (An early edition) I do have several of the later Compen
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00233.html (6,934 bytes)

76. RE: [TowerTalk] Terrain Analysis (TA) (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:21:22 -0600
Thanks- My version is an earlier one. I was hoping it was in one of the supplements (Compendia). Oh well. At 04:02 PM 1/8/2005 -0700, Gerry Smith wrote: Antenna Book, 20th edition or later Gerry Smit
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00235.html (8,454 bytes)

77. Re: [TowerTalk] TA or HFTA (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 07:13:25 -0600
Pete- Thanks for the clarification- The source of my confusion was a post that mentioned "TA" and the elevation database. HFTA is apparently what I really want. I guess I will have to get a later Ant
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00246.html (9,717 bytes)

78. RE: [TowerTalk] Banishment? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:16:41 -0600
I would like to point out that this was NOT put on to the list by Steve. He only posted , recently, in response to MANY speculative bashes based on only one post from the "customer". Get real, here.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00402.html (10,630 bytes)

79. [TowerTalk] Respect (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:36:16 -0600
This recent flap has taught me several things- I still respect Steve- There are several others on the list I DID respect, but do not, now. All the bashing based on ONE obviously biased post astounded
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00413.html (7,369 bytes)

80. Re: [TowerTalk] Station Ground (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 12:00:45 -0600
Tom Rauch, et alTime and LOTS of reading and checking have taught me that not heeding Your (Tom R) advice is a bad idea. Usually and However. (There is ALWAYS this pair of caveats.) My memory of read
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00608.html (11,537 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu