Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:aredandgold@msn.com: 43 ]

Total 43 documents matching your query.

41. [TowerTalk] OTQ - (score: 1)
Author: "Its from Onion" <aredandgold@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 18:00:59 -0500
Hey guys, I know this is a bit off topic but your learned thoughts please. EquipmentRohn 25 50 feet high with house bracket at 28 feet M2 40m 3 element survivor beam twisted with a Ham IV DOM mast 18
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00251.html (7,859 bytes)

42. Re: [TowerTalk] OTQ (score: 1)
Author: "Its from Onion" <aredandgold@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 12:11:58 -0500
Dale, I made a bet that this thread would revert to a house bracket tower wind load question. Its not really the people fault that only read the Rohn manual and never have climbed a tower. They don't
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00276.html (9,718 bytes)

43. [TowerTalk] Thoughts on this (score: 1)
Author: "Its from Onion" <aredandgold@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 03:51:09 -0500
This is the only mention of a ham tower in my city. Are they saying; 1. I can only have a tower 70 feet high? 2. Or if I have a business tower the accessory (ham) tower can only be 70 feet. Sec. 12.0
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00099.html (8,002 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 43
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu