Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ae7i@yahoo.com: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Wet setting conduit? (score: 1)
Author: Craig Sande <ae7i@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:29:43 -0800 (PST)
I am planning a tower base pour and my contractor has already dug the hole, framed it, and inserted the base. When it comes to placement of the conduit, he has suggested "wet setting" the conduit swe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00926.html (7,967 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Wet setting conduit? (score: 1)
Author: Craig Sande <ae7i@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:30:12 -0800 (PST)
I will check with the engineer to see if this would be ok with him. Since the actual hole size turned out much larger than the designed size, I believe that the excess concrete will compensate for th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00961.html (9,486 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Wet setting conduit? (score: 1)
Author: Craig Sande <ae7i@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:35:58 -0800 (PST)
I intend to have a three inch sweep for the RF/control cables, a one inch sweep for power to the tower motor, and three one inch sweeps for each of the ground radials. The hole for the base turned ou
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00962.html (11,657 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Wet setting conduit? (score: 1)
Author: Craig Sande <ae7i@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:33:37 -0800 (PST)
I finally decided not to risk any compromise to the base by introducing a total of 5 conduits. The pour will proceed tomorrow morning per the original engineering. When the dust settles, I will take
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00011.html (8,585 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu