- 181. Re: [TowerTalk] Loading Coils (score: 1)
- Author: David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 14:52:50 -0700
- If you have access to a 3D printer this might be an inexpensive alternative: https://youtu.be/qAgF9Mzr8XM or https://youtu.be/S6spyk1GRoo Personally, I'd go with the version that has a slight taper.
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2025-08/msg00005.html (7,819 bytes)
- 182. Re: [TowerTalk] Loading Coils (score: 1)
- Author: David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 15:19:10 -0700
- Yes ... that. Nickle has about 4 times worse electrical conductivity compared to copper, and the skin depth at 30 MHz is about 20 times thinner (about 12 microns for copper versus about 0.65 for nick
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2025-08/msg00006.html (9,380 bytes)
- 183. Re: [TowerTalk] Loading Coils (score: 1)
- Author: David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2025 14:08:47 -0700
- I believe that is likely to be a more efficient approach than using an inductor. It is possible to make air wound inductors with pretty high Q and not much loss, but the approach you used spreads th
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2025-08/msg00015.html (11,803 bytes)
- 184. Re: [TowerTalk] Loading Coils (score: 1)
- Author: David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2025 16:06:18 -0700
- Yeah, amplifier coils are a different animal than antenna loading coils. Lots different circuit impedance and lots different current levels. Still, his point is valid if you use a tank coil for a co
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2025-08/msg00016.html (9,786 bytes)
- 185. Re: [TowerTalk] Loading Coils (score: 1)
- Author: David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2025 18:06:26 -0700
- Jeff, you apparently didn't even bother to check out the guy's website. Here is a direct quote from it: "These coils are suited for amateur and commercial applications, including but not limited to
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2025-08/msg00018.html (12,512 bytes)
- 186. Re: [TowerTalk] Loading Coils (score: 1)
- Author: David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2025 00:08:09 -0700
- ChatGPT mostly agrees with you, except that it says that nickel with a high phosphorus content is almost impossible to solder to even when using an aggressive acid flux. Dave AB7E I remember lookin
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2025-08/msg00020.html (11,396 bytes)
- 187. [TowerTalk] Loading Coils (score: 1)
- Author: David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2025 11:33:34 -0700
- The guy who makes the nickel plated QCoils has his email address on his website, so I just sent him an email asking him what the plating actually is. Hopefully he answers. Dave AB7E _______________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2025-08/msg00026.html (7,903 bytes)
- 188. [TowerTalk] QCoils Answered (score: 1)
- Author: David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2025 13:11:37 -0700
- I guess that's why we call ourselves amateurs ... Dave AB7E _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contestin
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2025-08/msg00028.html (7,608 bytes)
- 189. Re: [TowerTalk] QCoils Answered (score: 1)
- Author: David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2025 13:51:27 -0700
- Well, it wasn't a waste from my point of view and I appreciate your search. I learned stuff I didn't know before. Take care, Dave AB7E Thanks for straightening us out! 73, Mike W4EF...............
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2025-08/msg00030.html (8,817 bytes)
- 190. Re: [TowerTalk] Loading Coils (score: 1)
- Author: David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2025 10:50:25 -0700
- I remember that as well. Well over $100 for even a moderately sized coil. That's why I came up with the do-it-yourself 3D printed concept that I posted here a few days ago. I can make exactly the
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2025-08/msg00044.html (11,028 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu