Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ab2os@att.net: 79 ]

Total 79 documents matching your query.

61. [TowerTalk] Yaesu rotators (score: 1)
Author: Alan AB2OS <ab2os@att.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:14:41 -0400
I am sure that a Yaesu G-800 would handle what I want to put up, but I thought that a G-1000 would give a better safety margin. Yet I notice that the eham reviews rate the G-1000 rotators lower than
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00708.html (7,469 bytes)

62. [TowerTalk] Run conduit up the tower? (score: 1)
Author: Alan AB2OS <ab2os@att.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:55:39 -0400
Is it a good idea to run, say, 3" PVC conduit up the tower to accommodate feedlines and rotor cable and protect them from birds, squirrels, etc.? Alan AB2OS __________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00715.html (6,704 bytes)

63. [TowerTalk] K-factor. Was: Yaesu rotators (score: 1)
Author: Alan AB2OS <ab2os@att.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 22:16:40 -0400
In the course of looking around for a good price for a G-1000DXA, I went to the Texas Towers Web site and noticed their explanation of the "K-factor" item that I have seen in ads for Yaesu rotators.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00736.html (9,211 bytes)

64. [TowerTalk] Effective moment and K-factor. Was: Yaesu rotators (score: 1)
Author: Alan AB2OS <ab2os@att.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 00:19:29 -0400
Is Yaesu's "K-factor" the same as Hy-Gain's "Effective moment"? If not, Alan AB2OS I wrote: In the course of looking around for a good price for a G-1000DXA, I went to the Texas Towers Web site and n
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00000.html (7,553 bytes)

65. Re: [TowerTalk] Effective moment and K-factor. Was: Yaesu rotators (score: 1)
Author: Alan AB2OS <ab2os@att.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 13:38:33 -0400
Somebody suggested in a private message (not to the reflector) that they are different: "effective moment" takes into account the distance from the axis of each component of the total load, whereas Y
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00011.html (8,659 bytes)

66. Re: [TowerTalk] What Welder Makes Good Exothermic Bonds? (score: 1)
Author: Alan AB2OS <ab2os@att.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 09:19:19 -0400
So how well would brazing with a Bernzomatic or similar Propane or MAPP torch work for bonding copper ground wires to copper-clad steel ground rods? Alan AB2OS (who did manage to produce some service
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00074.html (8,064 bytes)

67. Re: [TowerTalk] RCS-4 Coax Switch (score: 1)
Author: Alan AB2OS <ab2os@att.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 10:37:31 -0400
Do you think any other affordable switch would have survived a hit like this? I'm not being argumentative, just asking. Alan AB2OS On 07/05/04 07:54 am Floyd Sense put fingers to keyboard and launche
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00137.html (8,286 bytes)

68. Re: [TowerTalk] ICE lightning arrestor question (score: 1)
Author: Alan AB2OS <ab2os@att.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 22:43:02 -0400
Look here: http://www.arraysolutions.com/Products/ice/33.htm According to the circuit diagram at the bottom of the page, the resistor is on the rig side, and the gas tube and inductor are on the ante
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00176.html (8,713 bytes)

69. Re: [TowerTalk] RCS-4 Coax Switch (score: 1)
Author: Alan AB2OS <ab2os@att.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 07:12:58 -0400
So do you have any comment on this exchange copied from the alt.home.repair newsgroup (originally concerning whole-house power-line surge arrestors): ">Reality check here....I don't care what surge p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00180.html (10,521 bytes)

70. Re: [TowerTalk] Archeological find in my Anchor hole (score: 1)
Author: Alan AB2OS <ab2os@att.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 12:39:03 -0400
But how do I know which way to point the owl? Or is it possible to buy plastic owls that automatically point the right way? Alan AB2OS On 07/06/04 12:11 pm Richard M. Gillingham put fingers to keyboa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00195.html (9,328 bytes)

71. [TowerTalk] Limitation on tower width. Was: Revocation of BuildingPermit? (score: 1)
Author: Alan AB2OS <ab2os@att.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 07:43:15 -0400
No ideas on the primary question -- the legal one -- but I am surprised that the city limited the width of the tower to 18". The 60' AN Wireless tower (only a Light Duty model) I am planning to erect
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00473.html (8,381 bytes)

72. Re: [TowerTalk] Limitation on tower width. Was: Revocation ofBuildingPermit? (score: 1)
Author: Alan AB2OS <ab2os@att.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 14:07:37 -0400
Can't find anything about Sky Needles except that they were made by Tri-Ex, which is no more. I understand that Tashjian took over Tri-Ex but was getting rotten reviews, and I can't find "Sky Needle"
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00481.html (9,818 bytes)

73. Re: [TowerTalk] Limitation on tower width. Was: RevocationofBuildingPermit? (score: 1)
Author: Alan AB2OS <ab2os@att.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 16:14:42 -0400
But the bottom section is still as much as 32" dia. (too much for the OP). And how many cars could I buy for the price of one of those? Alan AB2OS On 07/17/04 02:17 pm Gene Smar put fingers to keyboa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00484.html (10,737 bytes)

74. Re: [TowerTalk] Replying to the list...AGAIN! (score: 1)
Author: Alan AB2OS <ab2os@att.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 19:32:09 -0400
Amen from yet another (G?)OF. Alan AB2OS On 07/20/04 06:49 pm Gary McDuffie, Sr. put fingers to keyboard and launched the following message into cyberspace: This will probably get me kicked off the l
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00548.html (9,015 bytes)

75. [TowerTalk] Taller tower, shorter mast or vice versa? (score: 1)
Author: Alan AB2OS <ab2os@att.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 18:46:28 -0400
The township rules permit an antenna/tower/mast up to a max. of 70' without a permit. I have settled on AN Wireless as my preferred tower manufacturer, and their towers are in multiples of 10'. Thus
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00580.html (8,557 bytes)

76. [TowerTalk] Tower/mast/antenna height -- a clarification (score: 1)
Author: Alan AB2OS <ab2os@att.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 00:20:44 -0400
The wording in my original message was my own. The relevant section of the ordinance is: "Sec. 3A.04 Applicability. A. New towers and antennas. All new towers and new antennas in the township shall b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00599.html (9,529 bytes)

77. [TowerTalk] Tower Depot? (score: 1)
Author: Alan AB2OS <ab2os@att.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:23:22 -0400
I have seen references to "Tower Depot" as a source of antenna towers (including the AN Wireless towers), with links to www.towerdepot.com. Unfortunately, that URL now belongs to a company selling to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00628.html (7,231 bytes)

78. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower/mast/antenna height -- a clarification (score: 1)
Author: Alan AB2OS <ab2os@att.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 22:06:20 -0400
The rest of the ordinance deals with permits, setbacks, painting of towers so as to be as unobtrusive as possible, collocation wherever possible, etc., etc. Yes, this is their version of "reasonable
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00675.html (9,603 bytes)

79. Re: [TowerTalk] Self-supportig tower base size (score: 1)
Author: Alan AB2OS <ab2os@att.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 15:31:22 -0400
I certainly haven't studied in detail the base specs. for every manufacturer's towers, but I must say that to me the AN Wireless specs. seem very comprehensive: five different sizes of base, each in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00696.html (8,790 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu