Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:W5LT@tx.rr.com: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] mast strength (score: 1)
Author: "W5LT" <W5LT@tx.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 17:25:02 -0600
Gregg: The 87,000 is the stress in pounds per square inch required for the metal to yield. You need to know the cross sectional configuration of your mast, (OD and wall thickness) and calculate what
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00391.html (8,395 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor Selection Advice Wanted - Heavy Duty (score: 1)
Author: "W5LT" <W5LT@tx.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:46:57 -0600
I believe the Prosistel design was changed in the last year or so. The version I have (about 8 months old) has the motor sticking straight out from the rotor housing, at right angle to the axis of ro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00296.html (12,291 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Third Order Intercept (score: 1)
Author: "W5LT" <W5LT@tx.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:13:46 -0600
The Third Order Intercept concept is a theoretical point that is projected as the intercept of the third order products from two equal level tones (slope = 3:1) and the fundamental of the tones (slop
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00730.html (8,488 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] tower bases and weight versus surrounding ground (score: 1)
Author: "W5LT" <W5LT@tx.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 07:22:15 -0600
Jeff: It is possible to design a foundation that can just sit on the ground and resist the over turning moment (OTM) of the tower/antennas. The soil underneath must support the compression forces tha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00271.html (9,647 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1)
Author: "W5LT" <W5LT@tx.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 09:29:04 -0500
With elevated radials operating at 180 kHz, the radials were probably a form of Litz wire, a multi-strand wire that has each strand insulated from the other. Such wire is necessary to get low loss at
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00645.html (11,626 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Cap/Inductance meter (score: 1)
Author: "W5LT" <W5LT@tx.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:39:18 -0500
Jake: You might consider the AIM-4170 Antenna Analyzer from Array Solutions. It is (to my knowledge) the only reasonably priced antenna analyzer that provides correctly signed reactance (X) in an imp
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00134.html (8,870 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR problem (score: 1)
Author: "W5LT" <W5LT@tx.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:19:39 -0500
Bill: I too have been following your exploits, both here and on the SteppIR reflector. I still believe the issue is related to the power supply. As Mike M. pointed out, the motor drive is via current
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00216.html (18,098 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR problem (score: 1)
Author: "W5LT" <W5LT@tx.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 07:06:16 -0500
Dick makes some good points. Cable capacitance and shunt capacitance of supressors will both increase the transient (and over-all average) current drawn from the power supply. A previous similar prob
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00237.html (24,845 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] step away from steppir, Son (score: 1)
Author: "W5LT" <W5LT@tx.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 06:48:08 -0500
Between 204BA & SteppIR 4El, it will be a valid horse race on 20 (although the SteppIR may beat you when a P5 shows up 180 deg away from where you both are looking). SteppIR will very likely do much
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00396.html (10,707 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR problem-update from the front lines (score: 1)
Author: "W5LT" <W5LT@tx.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 08:47:26 -0500
Jerry, K4SAV: Your transient measurement is a very good clue. It appears to me the 12V drop represents the power supply voltge regulator response time to the current surge due to the antenna tuning.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00547.html (15,137 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] fold over towers (score: 1)
Author: "W5LT" <W5LT@tx.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:58:17 -0500
Greg: Take a look at Heights Towers, they have a fold-over mechanism that works very well. I have an 80 ft tower that folds from the base using a motor driven jackscrew. MY tower is rated at 35 sq ft
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00822.html (9,929 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] fold over towers (score: 1)
Author: "W5LT" <W5LT@tx.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:06:53 -0500
I am showing my age, Steve. The RS stds became TIA standards quite some time back, but old habits are hard to break. I was using it in reference to wind loadings, not structural design details. The U
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00841.html (8,035 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Copper grounding bus bar (score: 1)
Author: "W5LT" <W5LT@tx.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 19:01:04 -0500
Here is where I got my equipment ground bar. It was reasonably priced, about $50 + shipping as I recall. It comes tapped for 12-24 about every inch, and available in many lengths, in 1 ft increments.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00344.html (9,111 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Shunt Feed Help (score: 1)
Author: "W5LT" <W5LT@tx.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 09:51:49 -0600
Kim: I question the accuracy of the impedance measurement. If it was an accurate value at the base of the tower, you should have found a good match at around 200pfd of series capacitance. Z = R+jX =
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-11/msg00385.html (8,849 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum tower welds...Old Data circa mid 1970's .......... (score: 1)
Author: "W5LT" <W5LT@tx.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 07:45:49 -0600
It appears you had a lemon. Welding of Aluminum is not something for the casual do-it-yourselfer. The process requires special equipment (Heliarc) to fuse the aluminum in a non-oxidizing environment
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00313.html (9,927 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] heights (score: 1)
Author: "W5LT" <W5LT@tx.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 17:18:46 -0500
I can confirm Richard's experience. I have had a 78 ft version (counting the 5 ft fold-over stand) for over 5 years. It works very well. You can fold it over or raise it in about 15 minutes. I have a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00172.html (8,209 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu