Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:RXDesign@ssvecnet.com: 303 ]

Total 303 documents matching your query.

61. [TowerTalk] Source for FIberglass rod... (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 17:24:26 -0700
anyone know where one can obtain various sizes of fiberglass rod for antennas? Similar to what is used at the center - 1" to 2"+ diameters solid fiberglass? thanks gary K9RX _________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00725.html (7,055 bytes)

62. [TowerTalk] Source for FIberglass rod... (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 18:19:17 -0700
Thanks to all who replied (so rapidly as well!) Two sources were mentioned - M2 and Max Gain Systems. Should do! g. _______________________________________________ ___________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00727.html (6,885 bytes)

63. Re: [TowerTalk] interaction problem... (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 19:14:03 -0700
Hey Dave... where are you with respect to Three Canyons and 92? g. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@con
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-11/msg00041.html (6,948 bytes)

64. [TowerTalk] 80 meter antenna comparison (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:58:13 -0700
Anyone do a comparison either sequentially (owned one and then the other) or ideally simultaneously of a well placed 80 meter dipole vs. a 2el long(er) boom Hi-Q coil beam? I currently have a F12 Sig
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00539.html (6,961 bytes)

65. [TowerTalk] 80 meter antenna comparison (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:08:53 -0700
Interesting.... however using EZNEC and their provided 4 SQ model I see different results then what your suggesting here... a DIPOLE at 136' (what I have) out performs a 4 SQ for all angles down to a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00566.html (8,623 bytes)

66. [TowerTalk] 80 meter antenna comparison (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:19:14 -0700
a couple more comments: first off I believe all would agree when you say that the yagi beats the 4 SQ by 3 db to as much as 2 S-units - this is a great deal! Even 3 db as we all know is non-trivial!
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00570.html (8,473 bytes)

67. [TowerTalk] antenna heights and the FAA/FCC (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 20:00:19 -0700
Im moving to Texas and have found a house that suits most of our needs with one exception the same one that KEEPS ruling out property unfortunately in this rules and regulation age... anyway the hous
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00122.html (8,579 bytes)

68. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna heights and the FAA/FCC (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 20:07:05 -0700
Super - I'll try that - thanks! g. A phone call to the FAA will usually net you an informal answer right away. I've gone through this with proposed lighting for a football field overlooking an airpor
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00124.html (9,582 bytes)

69. [TowerTalk] high tension power line noise... (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:24:27 -0700
Hello... my wife and I will be moving soon to a new area... one of the properties we are considering, and its really difficult to find something anymore that meets ALL the criteria county (no restric
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00174.html (7,929 bytes)

70. [TowerTalk] Triband Stacking Distance or antenna height? (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 18:11:28 -0600
Hello Rich, Im not sure if this will be inline with the thread youve created, a new thread or somewhere entirely separate... sorry if not inline where I intended it to be. I've had what you're planni
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00436.html (11,194 bytes)

71. [TowerTalk] modeling compare: 80M, 2EL vs 4SQ (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 19:47:59 -0500
Hello all.... please forgive the rehash but I feel a bit excited, at least for me on finding out HOW IMPORTANT ground quality is in evaluating a 4sq. Brief history: I had a rotary dipole in Arizona o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-03/msg00144.html (8,840 bytes)

72. Re: [TowerTalk] modeling compare: 80M, 2EL vs 4SQ (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 12:12:23 -0500
Hi John, I'm not sure what you're suggesting here.... I can go from the model with no radials and see a particular max gain and shape of the pattern... then add 17 radials each, even short ones at 0.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-03/msg00147.html (11,131 bytes)

73. Re: [TowerTalk] modeling compare: 80M, 2EL vs 4SQ (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 14:12:27 -0500
Thanks again John, As for switching.... the rotary dipole I have, a F12 Magnum, has 3 relay/coils and it covered from 3.5 - 4.0 at under 1.6:1 ... its relatively easily done so I'm not sure that is a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-03/msg00149.html (13,244 bytes)

74. Re: [TowerTalk] modeling compare: 80M, 2EL vs 4SQ (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 19:16:32 -0500
Hi Steve, Ive searched and cannot find any info on South Carolina other than that old map. It shows shows all of the area where I was as 8 mS. There is indeed soil there farming is going on all aroun
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-03/msg00152.html (8,577 bytes)

75. Re: [TowerTalk] modeling compare: 80M, 2EL vs 4SQ (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 08:27:51 -0500
at the site zoom in to your area of interest using the map. You can rubber band an area until you get there. Then once there select the AOI rectangle (or odd shape) symbol above the map and select th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-03/msg00161.html (12,247 bytes)

76. Re: [TowerTalk] modeling compare: 80M, 2EL vs 4SQ (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 08:54:00 -0500
Ed, Good points although if one were to do a 2 el it would quite nicely compete with a beverage on receive (RDFs very similar) so Id not downplay its FB. As for an elevated 4 sq... I had thought of t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-03/msg00162.html (9,715 bytes)

77. [TowerTalk] Questions on M2 antennas... (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 18:52:57 -0500
Im thinking of a 2 stack of the M2 15M6DX. Both antennas would be mounted across the face of Rohn 55 (rotating tower)... unfortunately their manual doesnt say what the distance is to the mast/balance
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00025.html (8,228 bytes)

78. [TowerTalk] EZ files ... M2 yagis (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 20:12:26 -0500
I have models of the 20M4DX, 20M5LGS, 15M6DX and the 10M7DX if anyone is looking for them. Also 2X for all of these and some mixes as well. All done under 500 segments. write me at garymyers at power
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00034.html (6,615 bytes)

79. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna choices (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 09:18:07 -0500
At the very bottom of the page for Original Tennadynne products is this statement: " *These gain figures are fictitious, but since other antenna manufacturers tend to use them to manipulate things in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00052.html (9,113 bytes)

80. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna choices (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 19:57:02 -0500
How did you determine that? Inquiring minds want to know. Cheers,Steve K7LXC I used their manuals and created models for the 20M4DX, the 20M5LGS, the 20M5, the 15M6DX and the 10M7DX. All of the resu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00065.html (9,639 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu