Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:PaulKB8N@aol.com: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: Shakespeare Vertical Antennas (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1998 10:26:30 EDT
Gus, I'd be a little wary of these antennas. I, too, picked up several at a bargain price, and, after testing them, found that they had breaks in the coil that is wound on the inside of the fiberglas
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00527.html (7,672 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Poor Man's Rhombic (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N)
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 23:02:49 EDT
<< Oh, now this is interesting - so maybe a poor man's rhombic could be made Ward, I've done it and it works quite well. If you can scan some old QSTs there was an article from a ZS back in the 70s w
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00868.html (7,341 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Telephone RFI (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N)
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 08:25:15 EST
<< I see in the Radio Shack catalog they have a telephone RFI filter. looks very much the same as the K-Com. 73 Jim KI7Y I have completely removed all RFI by simply inserting a small RF Choke (2.5 uH
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-03/msg00059.html (7,865 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Small lot -- need help (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N)
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1998 09:39:47 EST
Cathryn, Congrats on getting your Extra, and I'm glad you're getting excited about contesting. a 42 by 120' lot may seem small, but before you invest big bucks in a tower and beam, consider trying so
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-03/msg00539.html (8,479 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Subdivision Deed restrictions (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N)
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1998 19:41:23 EST
Hi Bob, One aspect you may consider is that unenforced deed restrictions equal no deed restrictions, at least as I understand it. I have maintained antennas (low profile though they are) very openly
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-03/msg00547.html (7,821 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Antenna Peformance (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 1998 19:28:02 EST
<< Well, off the top of my head, you are claiming greater than 12.75db over the other station. >> Not true, I routinely have bumped other high power stations using QRP or low power. A good location i
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00391.html (7,395 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] Tree Climbing (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 1998 15:19:50 EST
<< have the need to climb some trees in my backyard for some stealthy Bill, Being a "pure stealth" antenna user, I have avoided climbing trees by instead using a 24' painter's pole (available at Home
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00477.html (9,572 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Re: link tuners size disadvantage (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 09:59:35 -0500 (EST)
Link coupled tuners have but one disadvantage, size. Generally, large coils must be used. Also, enclosures must be failrly large. I wonder if anyone has tried fabricating a link-coupled coil assembl
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00344.html (7,331 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Stealth Wire Vertical (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 09:37:56 -0500 (EST)
<< Comment about antenna wires lighting fires in trees is, of course, valid. I totally burned up (left ashes only) the fiberglass end inulators on my 160 traped dipole a couple of years ago. Found th
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00520.html (8,809 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Maintenance of "Natural Towers" (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 15:47:26 -0500 (EST)
Gang, I just invested in my antenna systems. No, I didn't buy a tower or beam, but I greatly improved my antenna situation. Being in a covenant restricted neighborhood, the numerous trees on my lot h
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00568.html (8,931 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] Tuned Feeders (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 1997 14:56:02 -0400 (EDT)
<< Even better would be open wire line, if you could find it. Radio Shack used to carry this stuff about 20 years ago for use with television antennas, but no more. Or you can make your own. >> I've
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00024.html (8,000 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] Vines, Hau trees, and Sun (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 09:29:59 -0400 (EDT)
<< Do the legs of V-beams have to be exactly equal in length?? I know they should, but as the terrain beneath each leg is so unequal, and the far ends will not be at equal elevations, will several do
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00639.html (8,373 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] Wire Alternatives to four squares? (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 23:46:16 -0500 (EST)
Gang, I've been watching with interest the beam vs. four-square discussions on this reflector. One thing that hasn't been mentioned has been wire altenatives. Vee beams can be extremely efficient, di
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00711.html (8,269 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] Connector insertion loss (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 1997 00:59:23 -0400 (EDT)
Steve, Paul -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-towertalk@contes
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-09/msg00009.html (7,767 bytes)

15. [TowerTalk] WX7M 280' long 20M Yagi (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 11:10:44 -0400 (EDT)
<< I cant help but wonder why he chose a REALLY long boom design rather than doing something with multiple yagis stacked or side by side yagis? Is this 280' long antenna going to be the strongest thi
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-09/msg00516.html (9,387 bytes)

16. [TowerTalk] "Leaky" Coax, What is it? (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N@aol.com)
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 1997 23:51:47 -0400 (EDT)
To the forum: I have seen several posts to this column regarding "leaky" coax. After investing a significant amount of time and effort into attempting to understand this phenomenon, I felt my finding
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00360.html (14,017 bytes)

17. [TowerTalk] "Leaky" Coax, What is it? (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 1997 15:47:05 -0400 (EDT)
Tyler, Thanks for the input. I agree that leakage can and does exist and can be designed into a cable. I guess the three main points I was trying to make were: 1. A quality grade coax should provide
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00374.html (9,069 bytes)

18. [TowerTalk] Re: Need Ideas for 2-band Dipole (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 13:54:54 -0400 (EDT)
Bob, Might I add to to LB's suggestion that if youconstruct a trap dipole, use a high quality plenum coax to construct your traps. The silver-braided, teflon-insulated stuff may cost a few bucks a fo
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00400.html (7,869 bytes)

19. [TowerTalk] Some thoughts on coax leakage (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 21:38:53 -0400 (EDT)
<< > This means that our coax leakage is at least *66 dB* stronger than I submit that this factor is only important in co-frequency situations, where antenna coupling would be much more significant a
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00434.html (10,649 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu