Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:N8NGA@one.net: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

21. Fwd: Re: [TowerTalk] Jontz 60-ft Self-Supporting Tower Info? (score: 1)
Author: Bob Otto <N8NGA@one.net> (Bob Otto)
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:46:06 -0500
Hello Florentino, WOW!!! TowerTalk is back up and running <G> Welcome back everyone! 73 from....... Bob Otto N8NGA@one.net Cincinnati, Ohio Time Written: 11:34:17 PM Attachments: <none> ** DXCC 10M *
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00345.html (9,120 bytes)

22. Re[2]: [TowerTalk] Tower concerns (score: 1)
Author: Bob Otto <N8NGA@one.net> (Bob Otto)
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 16:27:11 -0500
Hello Dave, I've been watching this thread from a distance. I am not a PE, and do not have the formulas that you guys are using. I do have some reasonable real world experience based on several frees
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00309.html (19,831 bytes)

23. Re[2]: [TowerTalk] Tower concerns (score: 1)
Author: Bob Otto <N8NGA@one.net> (Bob Otto)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 16:32:37 -0500
Hello Group, Bill said: "That's the one thing I realised after reading TowerTalk a couple of years. If you want to put a tower up right, it's going to cost you, but you'll end up with something that
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00412.html (12,368 bytes)

24. Fwd: Re[2]: [TowerTalk] Tower Concerns (score: 1)
Author: Bob Otto <N8NGA@one.net> (Bob Otto)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 19:35:26 -0500
One thing more to consider. It seems to me that perhaps sometime about 5-10 years ago the national requirements changed. Most municipalities adopted the new standards. This caused tower manufacturers
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00419.html (14,717 bytes)

25. Fwd: Re[2]: [TowerTalk] RE: [Tower Talk] Tri-Ex (score: 1)
Author: Bob Otto <N8NGA@one.net> (Bob Otto)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 23:20:33 -0500
Hello TTers, I hate to say it, but it appears many of you have TOO much time on your hands!! This debate on a company that none of you really know anything about is unfair, and inappropriate. I under
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00527.html (13,080 bytes)

26. Fwd: Re[4]: [TowerTalk] RE: [Tower Talk] Tri-Ex (score: 1)
Author: Bob Otto <N8NGA@one.net> (Bob Otto)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 10:08:15 -0500
Hello K4IK, I think that's a fair summary. We'll see what happens -- and be cautious. 73 from....... Bob Otto N8NGA@one.net Cincinnati, Ohio ** DXCC 10M ** DX is !! ** WAS 10M There is a very fine li
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00535.html (10,189 bytes)

27. Fwd: Re[2]: Fwd: Re[2]: [TowerTalk] RE: [Tower Talk] Tri-Ex (score: 1)
Author: Bob Otto <N8NGA@one.net> (Bob Otto)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 10:08:42 -0500
Hello Steve, I don't disagree a bit. My point was "don't damn the new company -- damn the individual that gave you bad service (Joel)". Also, I suggested, just suggested, that maybe the reason the se
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00536.html (10,142 bytes)

28. Fwd: Re[2]: [TowerTalk] RE: [Tower Talk] Tri-Ex (score: 1)
Author: Bob Otto <N8NGA@one.net> (Bob Otto)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 10:09:48 -0500
Hello Dan, Dang I hate to to do this....but I can't help myself <chuckle> No, not all companies need to certify ISO9001. I disagree strongly that certification companies are scammers!! Here's a thoug
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00537.html (10,159 bytes)

29. [TowerTalk] For all us antenna nuts.... (score: 1)
Author: Bob Otto <N8NGA@one.net> (Bob Otto)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:28:05 -0500
Hello Pete, All I can say is WOW!! Wonder where all the $$'s came from to build that station. Surely that house isn't a "club station" <G> Guess me and my little tower will just keep quiet <chuckle>
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00729.html (8,470 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu