Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Guy: 918 ] [ Olinger: 862 ]

Total 529 documents matching your query.

201. [TowerTalk] Source of 3/8" 6061 tubing? (score: 131)
Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 19:37:14 GMT
Hi, Anybody have a source for T6061 3/8" 1/16 wall aluminum tubing. Or a likely place to call. The closer to Raleigh the better. Can make do for WPX with about 5 foot piece. Anyone have some lying ar
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00370.html (7,393 bytes)

202. [TowerTalk] Source of 3/8" 6061 tubing? (score: 131)
Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 20:30:37 GMT
Many thanks for the quick responses all. Stuff already arranged from Texas Towers, as advised by some ten responses. By the way, the Great Kitchen Project (since 9/98) is now officially war-departmen
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00371.html (8,143 bytes)

203. [TowerTalk] Buried Hardline (score: 131)
Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 22:26:23 GMT
Not to argue with any of the excellent points posted previously, but this subject really is one of those YMMV issues. One really needs to think through the particulars of one's own situation and see
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00017.html (9,318 bytes)

204. [TowerTalk] C4 40 Meter Coax Repair (score: 131)
Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 1999 21:28:31 GMT
When the half antenna was hanging by the coax, exactly what on the antenna end was transferring the support to the antenna? Lots of black tape, or possibly the coax PL259/SO239 at the B1 balun? If so
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00108.html (8,930 bytes)

205. [TowerTalk] Guy wire interaction (score: 131)
Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 1999 21:35:50 GMT
RAA16758 Sender: owner-towertalk@contesting.com Precedence: bulk X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C radiate It's just another conductor in the
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00131.html (9,974 bytes)

206. [TowerTalk] Guy wire interaction (score: 131)
Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 1999 15:16:02 GMT
Remembering that the only element on a yagi which is actually resonant at the operating frequency is the driven element (all the others are long or short)... If you are only going to have 20/15/10 at
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00143.html (9,792 bytes)

207. [TowerTalk] Guy wire interaction - the devil is in the details (score: 131)
Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 19:00:09 GMT
Just exactly what I would have done. Dippers may be a pain, but they certainly can confirm the [octave, order of magnitude, general neighborhood, approximate value] of a capacitor or inductor. It *w
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00193.html (10,170 bytes)

208. [TowerTalk] Guy wire interaction - Murphy's in the details (score: 131)
Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 20:18:59 GMT
Are we assuming that all these insulators are alike at RF? Since they are manufactured en masse by umpteen manufacturers for power poles, likely (??) without regard for RF characteristics, why shoul
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00194.html (7,918 bytes)

209. [TowerTalk] Yaesu G1000SDX Rotor parts/support (score: 131)
Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 22:38:49 GMT
SAA07882 Sender: owner-towertalk@contesting.com Precedence: bulk X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C Well, I might agree with you if it was the
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00523.html (8,948 bytes)

210. [TowerTalk] Bringing Ladder Line into the house ?? (score: 131)
Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 16:32:23 GMT
If the ladder line is 450 ohms, and well matched at the operating frequencies, Palomar makes a nice 9:1 transformer that goes balanced 450 to unbalanced, I think three 150 ohm lines around a core. In
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00626.html (12,065 bytes)

211. [TowerTalk] Best Vertical? (score: 131)
Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 15:41:44 GMT
Picture worth a 1000 words. See http://www.qth.com/force12/zr.htm 73, Guy --. .-.. Guy Olinger, K2AV k2av@qsl.net Apex, NC, USA -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions:
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00628.html (8,451 bytes)

212. [TowerTalk] Bringing Ladder Line into the house ?? (score: 131)
Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 19:14:20 GMT
It turns out to be somewhat less than twice the impedance of the lines taken separately. Double 75 coax used as a balanced feedline was called 130 or 135 ohm at AT&T. Someone know the reasons why? (W
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00653.html (9,751 bytes)

213. [TowerTalk] Bringing Ladder Line into the house ?? (score: 131)
Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 15:21:29 GMT
<3725A928.B17BCA50@imt.net> In-Reply-To: <3725A928.B17BCA50@imt.net> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MI
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00658.html (9,969 bytes)

214. [TowerTalk] Bringing Ladder Line into the house (score: 131)
Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 15:27:37 GMT
LAA01267 Sender: owner-towertalk@contesting.com Precedence: bulk X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C A good rule for short as explained below i
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00660.html (8,405 bytes)

215. [TowerTalk] Bringing Ladder Line into the house ?? (score: 131)
Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 15:22:27 GMT
I know that stuff too. In an analog LD switching office there were tons of it at the channelbank/group level. 135 ohm shielded twisted pair. But what I was talking about was two pieces of coax held s
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00678.html (10,625 bytes)

216. [TowerTalk] K-factor Revisited (score: 131)
Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 17:16:31 GMT
Hmmm, Boom length X weight? Not too bad really. Obviously a worst case approximation, but not so bad. Assume that the weight is distributed over a square that is the boom length on each side with the
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00021.html (9,116 bytes)

217. [TowerTalk] K-factor Revisited (score: 131)
Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 21:46:56 GMT
I don't think I missed the point. True, I didn't use the term mass. True, weight is felt down. My 2 year old grandson knows that. Weight is *mass* felt down because of the acceleration necessary to o
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00024.html (10,920 bytes)

218. [TowerTalk] Rotator and Antenna Standards (score: 131)
Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 16:17:36 GMT
On Tue, 02 Mar 1999 09:18:54 -0500, Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com> wrote: Yup, if we're talking about the high end. More inclined to accept your point on the high-end stuff because of the methods us
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00046.html (10,295 bytes)

219. [TowerTalk] Rotator and Antenna Standards (score: 131)
Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 16:30:33 GMT
Glad to see you're still out there hiding in the weeds... An interesting observation of mine is that although *writing down* these discussions can be difficult, just about all the hams I know underst
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00047.html (10,550 bytes)

220. [TowerTalk]Rotator and Antenna Standards (score: 131)
Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 16:45:21 GMT
On Tue, 02 Mar 1999 00:54:28 -0800, Kurt Andress <K7NV@contesting.com> wrote: Well, no... Do you have any idea how many people read this reflector? I have had people I never met before walk up to me
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00050.html (9,099 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu