Mail Archive Search: <+from:Fatchett.Mike@tci.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:Fatchett.Mike@tci.com: 56 ]

Total 56 documents matching your query.

21. [TowerTalk] Major changes at Hy-Gain (score: 1): Author: Fatchett.Mike@tci.com (Fatchett, Mike); Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 14:40:07 -0600; So much for running to your local dealer to pick up a rotor or antenna on the spur of the moment. Unfortunately, I think this will be a continuing trend. Mike W0MU -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contestin; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00531.html (7,956 bytes)
22. [TowerTalk] Raising mast? (score: 1): Author: Fatchett.Mike@tci.com (Fatchett, Mike); Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 15:20:39 -0600; In addition to Steve's comments I like to put a 2x4 or 4x4 under the mast after clamping it down with the TB. You can also bolt a muffler clamp or two right above the TB just in case. Mike W0MU << I; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00585.html (11,304 bytes)
23. [TowerTalk] New antenna from Force12 the C31XR.... (score: 1): Author: Fatchett.Mike@tci.com (Fatchett, Mike); Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 15:31:44 -0600; You can see this new antenna at http://www.vcr.com/visalia/C3XR.jpg Http://www.vcr.com/visalia/C3XR2.jpg The site wanted capital letters for the jpg. Mike W0MU -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.co; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00587.html (7,232 bytes)
24. [TowerTalk] Comparisons (score: 1): Author: Fatchett.Mike@tci.com (Fatchett, Mike); Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 13:10:03 -0600; Just my 2 cents worth. I have a TH7 and a C3. The Th7 is at 50 feet and the C3 is at 80. They are separated by about 100 feet. In every instance the C3 has been the better antenna. This applies to no; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00678.html (7,986 bytes)
25. [TowerTalk] Comparisons (score: 1): Author: Fatchett.Mike@tci.com (Fatchett, Mike); Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 16:01:33 -0600; Like I said over time the C3 wins out. I realize 30 feet is a big difference. But the so called gain of the Th7 is far greater than the C3....My point is that These huge trapped antennas may not be a; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00686.html (7,311 bytes)
26. [TowerTalk] TH7 and C3 (score: 1): Author: Fatchett.Mike@tci.com (Fatchett, Mike); Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 09:07:57 -0600; Ok, I have received a few comments privately about this. Let me clarify. The 80 foot tower is guyed with phylistran. The Th7 is located on another self supporting tower. I have had the Th7 at 80 feet; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00713.html (7,607 bytes)
27. [TowerTalk] SS Nuts and Bolts (score: 1): Author: Fatchett.Mike@tci.com (Fatchett, Mike); Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 08:44:56 -0700; Mike W0MU I finally broke the u-bolt. I went to the other nut and it did exactly the same thing. I was concerned about the other pair of nuts on the other u-bolt, but they came off just fine. -- FAQ; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00444.html (8,029 bytes)
28. [TowerTalk] Force 12 Magnum tuning (score: 1): Author: Fatchett.Mike@TCI.com (Fatchett, Mike); Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 08:39:04 -0700; I believe that it also makes your boom length of the other elements appear longer. Apparently the effective boom length is seen as the distance from the upper piece to the other elements. I hope thi; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00301.html (9,865 bytes)
29. [TowerTalk] ICE Filters (score: 1): Author: Fatchett.Mike@tci.com (Fatchett, Mike); Date: Mon, 4 Aug 1997 08:43:30 -0600; Does ICE have a web page? Does anyone have a telephone number for them? Mike W0MU -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative reque; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00085.html (7,078 bytes)
30. [TowerTalk] I.C.E. Telphone Numbers (score: 1): Author: Fatchett.Mike@tci.com (Fatchett, Mike); Date: Mon, 4 Aug 1997 09:32:09 -0600; -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com Se; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00089.html (6,814 bytes)
31. [TowerTalk] texas towers back order (score: 1): Author: Fatchett.Mike@tci.com (Fatchett, Mike); Date: Thu, 3 Jul 1997 09:10:30 -0600; Sounds like a simple phone call to the customer when the shipping discrepancy was found would have eliminated this mess! Mike W0MU -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissio; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00116.html (8,193 bytes)
32. [TowerTalk] texas towers back order (score: 1): Author: Fatchett.Mike@tci.com (Fatchett, Mike); Date: Thu, 3 Jul 1997 10:50:56 -0600; Sounds like a simple telephone call when they found out that the thimbles were not is stock would have prevented this. Mike W0MU -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00124.html (8,122 bytes)
33. [TowerTalk] Beware Trylon Towers (score: 1): Author: Fatchett.Mike@tci.com (Fatchett, Mike); Date: Thu, 3 Jul 1997 13:05:51 -0600; How does Trylon sell any tower with this policy!??? I can't believe the commercial industry would even consider putting up a tower that they could not get specs/drawings for. I wonder how you get ins; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00135.html (11,068 bytes)
34. [TowerTalk] 160 meter antenna (score: 1): Author: Fatchett.Mike@tci.com (Fatchett, Mike); Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 13:01:50 -0600; Looking for ideas and quick and easy 160m antennas. I don't think I have enough room a dipole. Not looking for a great DX antenna. Just need to work NA for the NA QSO party. Mike W0MU -- FAQ on WWW:; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00657.html (7,200 bytes)
35. [TowerTalk] 160 antenna (score: 1): Author: Fatchett.Mike@tci.com (Fatchett, Mike); Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 15:36:05 -0600; Let me add some to my request for quick and easy 160m antennas. I do have an 80 foot tower and trees. The station is on 4 acres. The dipole would probably be the easiest if I had trees in the right p; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00660.html (7,315 bytes)
36. [TowerTalk] 1/2 sloper problems (score: 1): Author: Fatchett.Mike@tci.com (Fatchett, Mike); Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 10:55:42 -0600; I tried putting one up this weekend. Could not get a decent SWR anywhere. I tried adding length and subtracting length. Tried moving the point where it attaches to the tower from 70 feet to 78 feet.; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00790.html (7,489 bytes)
37. [TowerTalk] Force 12 C3 (score: 1): Author: Fatchett.Mike@tci.com (Fatchett, Mike); Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 10:45:27 -0600; Well the weekend weather patterns finally allowed me to get the C3 installed on the tower at 80 feet. I have a Cushcraft 40-2cd mounted above it at 90 feet. Initial response: So far it is performing; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00855.html (7,931 bytes)
38. [TowerTalk] 1/2 sloper for 160 continued (score: 1): Author: Fatchett.Mike@tci.com (Fatchett, Mike); Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 09:15:52 -0600; Last night I was able to play with the sloper again. I get a great SWR curve at 2.0, 1:1! Adding length did not have much effect. I would conclude that I don't have enough tower. One idea was to add; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00890.html (7,362 bytes)
39. [TowerTalk] 9N1 (score: 1): Author: Fatchett.Mike@tci.com (Fatchett, Mike); Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 10:46:25 -0600; I agree that he can do it anyway he wants. I think those of us that have been to DX locations owe him a description of what worked best for us. What is the goal of the DX-Pedition? Just want to ragch; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00174.html (9,567 bytes)
40. [TowerTalk] Towers (score: 1): Author: Fatchett.Mike@tci.com (Fatchett, Mike); Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 12:37:59 -0600; Looking at the Trylon towers page I see no reference to the amount of torque these towers can handle. I know that some of Rohn's self supporting towers will only accommodate a 10 foot boom. Does Tryl; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00566.html (6,919 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]