Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+spot\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: spot (score: 1)
Author: ke9et199@charter.net
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2023 23:29:25 +0000
Interesting spot......? 2324Z 1.832.Ø TN8K DL3DXX wkd NM6V,W6AEA,WB6CJT big remo Republic of the Congo (TN) _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflect
/archives//html/Topband/2023-01/msg00063.html (6,097 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: spot (score: 1)
Author: Ralf Stieber <dl9dra@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 12:06:39 +0100
_________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2023-01/msg00065.html (6,687 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: spot (score: 1)
Author: Paul Mcl <paul.mcl@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 11:34:17 +0000
I recently worked WB6CJT twice on CW: 160m on 24Nov22 @ 2130Z 80m on 7Dec/22 @ 2215Z I emailed to ask if he was transmitting from CA per his QRZ.com details and he confirmed that was correct and he w
/archives//html/Topband/2023-01/msg00066.html (7,004 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: spot (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 07:07:53 -0700
Did he say which ocean ? Sorry, but extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. 73, Steve, N2IC _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2023-01/msg00069.html (8,335 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: spot (score: 1)
Author: STEVE MCDONALD <ve7sl@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 07:48:18 -0700 (MST)
Highly unlikely at 1:30 in the afternoon in California. _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector -- WEB - "The VE7SL Radio Notebook": http://qsl.n
/archives//html/Topband/2023-01/msg00070.html (8,417 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: spot (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 07:50:51 -0800
I used to live near Granada Hills - not near an ocean. I guess he could have a remote station somewhere - but again, 1:30 PM in SoCal is a no go. I can't imagine where someone would have a big rhombi
/archives//html/Topband/2023-01/msg00071.html (9,871 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: spot (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 09:42:46 -0800
All of this is an example of why ARRL card checkers must have achieved DXCC on topband before they can check topband cards. 73, Jim K9YC _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.c
/archives//html/Topband/2023-01/msg00076.html (8,087 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: spot (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 10:47:32 -0700
What kind of card checking is done for LoTW confirmations ? 73, Steve, N2IC _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2023-01/msg00078.html (8,255 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: spot (score: 1)
Author: "GEORGE WALLNER" <aa7jv@atlanticbb.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 15:37:48 -0500
What size a rhombic would be "large" on 160 m? Perhaps long enough for far end to be close to the other station. 73, George Sorry, but extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. 73, Steve, N2I
/archives//html/Topband/2023-01/msg00081.html (9,288 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: spot (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 13:30:57 -0800
There are, unfortunately, some inconsiderate hams who won't use LOTW. Thankfully, fewer as time goes by. When we were kids, the "final courtesy of a QSO" was a QSL, and postage was 2-3 cents. Now it'
/archives//html/Topband/2023-01/msg00082.html (8,732 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: spot (score: 1)
Author: Jim Kinney <jimkinney@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 18:27:21 -0500
I got some checked at our local hamfest.  It takes about 3-4 weeks for them to show up LoTW. 73, Jim WE4S Get BlueMail for Android _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_to
/archives//html/Topband/2023-01/msg00083.html (9,285 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: spot (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 16:52:54 -0700
You all missed my point. QSL's confirmed solely LoTW aren't checked by any person. For example, MM0ZBH QSO with WB6CTL is now QSL'd in LoTW for DXCC purposes as a 160 meter QSO at 2130Z. 73, Steve, N
/archives//html/Topband/2023-01/msg00084.html (9,904 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: spot (score: 1)
Author: uy0zg via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 07:49:52 +0200
Hi folks Unfortunately, there are more and more collectors on this list than lovers of 160m. http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-160M-20230109-USLetter.pdf I, for example, am interested in anot
/archives//html/Topband/2023-01/msg00086.html (11,370 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu