Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Top\s+Band\s+and\s+JT65\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Top\s+Band\s+and\s+JT65\s*$/: 67 ]

Total 67 documents matching your query.

41. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1): Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 00:03:36 -0400; There is JTDX, based on WSJT-X, but with some additional tweaks for the HF user. 73 de Vince, VA3VF _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00079.html (7,734 bytes)
42. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1): Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 00:08:54 -0400; You didn't really mean this, did you? 73 de Vince, VA3VF _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00080.html (7,961 bytes)
43. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1): Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 00:17:12 -0400; JC, Amateur radio is basically about RF, not modes. Modes, beginning with code, were and are being added as technology permits. 73 de Vince, VA3VF _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http:; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00081.html (7,914 bytes)
44. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1): Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 00:21:30 -0400; JC, I'm way behind reading messages. Please disregard my last one. As we say in our mother tongue 'gosto nao se discute'. :^)) 73 de Vince, VA3VF _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http:/; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00082.html (7,791 bytes)
45. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1): Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 00:31:01 -0400; JT modes are weak signal modes, not necessarily low power/QRP modes. The power needed on 160 will likely be higher than on 20, for example. The benefit is that, mode by mode, JT can do more with les; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00083.html (8,280 bytes)
46. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1): Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 00:39:13 -0400; Fair enough. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. Another angle. I find JT65 to be a very relaxing mode. Which other mode allows one to read and write emails, go get a coffee, answer 'nature; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00084.html (7,577 bytes)
47. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1): Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 10:48:01 +0000; It seems the the something worth working for would be worth striving for. Having WAS on 160 Qrp posted on the wall always reminds me of the effort of operating and the time spent learning about anten; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00086.html (8,797 bytes)
48. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 13:48:17 -0500; I haven't even listened for anything digital in several years. But I need to share some things soon --that K1JT himself told me via email-- concerning JT65 vs JT9 on 160. To make a long story short,; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00090.html (8,826 bytes)
49. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1): Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 11:58:29 -0700; I've never operated JT65, so maybe some of you experts can answer a beginner's question. Searching on line, it is difficult to get a definitive answer to how much advantage it has over CW, but the nu; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00091.html (11,136 bytes)
50. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1): Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 15:10:25 -0400; Mike, I'm most interested in hearing more about your conversation with K1JT about JT9. I've been away from the WSJTGroup for some time, and may have missed any new info about the mode. In theory, JT9; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00092.html (10,939 bytes)
51. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1): Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 15:23:15 -0400; Rick, The technical explanation takes into account a number of conditions. The details are all available on K1JT's website. If memory serves, it uses 2.5kHz BW in the calculations. CW will have diffe; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00093.html (12,229 bytes)
52. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1): Author: "k8bhz@alphacomm.net" <k8bhz@alphacomm.net>; Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 23:47:54 -0400; Promised myself I'd stay out of this, but it's getting ridiculous....Comments like "I worked 20 new ones on 160, and I never heard any of them!". Wow! That's amazing...I personally can't find any sat; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00101.html (12,674 bytes)
53. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1): Author: "Glenn Wyant" <va3dx@sympatico.ca>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 06:09:37 -0400; If an amateur has interest in psk, jt65 etc or EME, cw or any band or mode; it is not for us to judge his particular interests. VA3DX Promised myself I'd stay out of this, but it's getting ridiculous; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00103.html (13,703 bytes)
54. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1): Author: Mike va3mw <va3mw@portcredit.net>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 06:20:43 -0400; Glenn nailed it. If you don't like it, don't use it. No one is forcing anyone to comply. It is really that simple. Mike va3mw one of the last real challenges left.... _________________ Topband Reflec; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00104.html (14,205 bytes)
55. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1): Author: Dave Clouser <dave@nz3m.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 06:58:59 -0400; As an electrical engineer you should realize that your rig _also_ turns otherwise undetected signals into something you can hear. Open the window, hearing any DX? Promised myself I'd stay out of this; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00106.html (13,014 bytes)
56. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1): Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 16:29:35 -0400; The issue is not one of any mode being more "valid" that the other, nor is it one of a QSO being "valid" or "invalid" based upon the mode. If a two way exchange is completed between two legally licen; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00122.html (16,362 bytes)
57. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1): Author: "k8bhz@alphacomm.net" <k8bhz@alphacomm.net>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 16:47:21 -0400; Very well said Mark, thank you. Brian K8BHZ The issue is not one of any mode being more "valid" that the other, nor is it one of a QSO being "valid" or "invalid" based upon the mode. If a two way exc; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00123.html (18,097 bytes)
58. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1): Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 17:40:40 -0400; Because I use my human skill that I developed over years to decode the CW signal. You don't do that for RTTY. Unless of course you're referring to using a CW decoder wherein you just read the decoded; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00125.html (9,511 bytes)
59. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1): Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 17:45:33 -0400; Mark, Very well said, but unless you consider the JT modes in a different class still than RTTY and PSK, except for mixed mode awards/contests, there is already a level playing field. Mixed is, well,; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00126.html (12,502 bytes)
60. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1): Author: Cecil Acuff <chacuff@cableone.net>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 17:01:31 -0500; This discussion is going nowhere...and will continue to go nowhere with the exception of the ill will it spreads...on of all places...a group to discuss things related to "The Gentlemans Band" None o; /archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00128.html (10,667 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]