Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+TN8K\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+TN8K\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: TN8K (score: 1): Author: Ron Spencer via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 10:42:28 -0700; I agree with KQ2M, TN8K was workable last night (Sunday) on both 80 and 160. Here in central NC they were actually better on 160. Long periods of very Q5 copy (maybe 10dB above the noise on 160) on; /archives//html/Topband/2023-01/msg00075.html (7,513 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: TN8K (score: 1): Author: Raymond Benny <rayn6vr@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 10:47:01 -0700; Got him on 80m CW last night, but he was never better than a 449. No peep of them on 160m. Ray, N6VR/W7YA Arizona _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband R; /archives//html/Topband/2023-01/msg00077.html (7,866 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]