Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Stew\s+Beef\s*$/: 56 ]

Total 56 documents matching your query.

41. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:36:13 -0500
One really needs to look at the contest rules before deciding to not send RST. If it is the rules, please send it. A few years ago, there was a bit of a blow up on the CQ Contest reflector over this
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00127.html (11,596 bytes)

42. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1)
Author: lloydberg@charter.net
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 09:43:09 -0600
Arent we forgetting that the signal report is how well the other station is receiving us, not how well we are getting out. One receiving station may have a high local noise level and reports your sig
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00128.html (8,831 bytes)

43. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:05:36 -0600
It's been a long time since I entered a contest seriously so I can't get DQd. Doug I wasn't born in Saskatchewan, but I got here as soon as I could. _____ One really needs to look at the contest rule
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00129.html (9,531 bytes)

44. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1)
Author: Art Snapper <art@nk8x.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 11:21:19 -0500
Does anyone recall the signal reports provided by Shortwave Listeners? It was SINFO, later SINPO. Signal, interference, noise, propagation, and overall. - If I recall correctly. It gave a better pict
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00130.html (9,034 bytes)

45. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:32:50 -0600
So for contesters the next logical step would be to eliminate the signal report. Doug I wasn't born in Saskatchewan, but I got here as soon as I could. --Original Message-- Does anyone recall the sig
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00131.html (9,115 bytes)

46. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1)
Author: "Mort" <mort.g2jl@ntlworld.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 11:34:44 -0500
"...The days of "honest reports" in a contest? I am 63 years old, operated my first contest when I was 18 and I don't remember those days. You found out how well your station "got out" by how long yo
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00132.html (10,053 bytes)

47. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1)
Author: "Mort" <mort.g2jl@ntlworld.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 11:38:10 -0500
"...some folks cried fowl...." So, did he chicken out ? 73 - Mort, G2JL _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00133.html (8,510 bytes)

48. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1)
Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 16:49:42 +0000
Eggsactly. -- Michael Adams | N1EN | mda@n1en.org --Original Message-- "...some folks cried fowl...." So, did he chicken out ? 73 - Mort, G2JL _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://ww
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00134.html (8,206 bytes)

49. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1)
Author: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 17:20:48 +0000 (UTC)
I agree. This is my biggest gripe about contests, meaningless signal reports. You hear SIG 599 PSE RPT. Any data sent which does not convey information is noise. This turns off hams, and more importa
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00136.html (9,043 bytes)

50. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1)
Author: Merv Schweigert <k9fd@flex.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 07:30:49 -1000
No he just ducked "...some folks cried fowl...." So, did he chicken out ? 73 - Mort, G2JL _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband . _________________ Topband
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00138.html (8,753 bytes)

51. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 09:32:27 -0800
I agree. The contesters I know have better rigs, better antenna systems, better operating skills, better knowledge of propagation than the average active ham. And they chose/put together those "bette
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00139.html (9,635 bytes)

52. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 12:32:42 -0500
You don't USE signal reports in Stew Perry, just grid squares. The only place anybody might use real signal reports in contests these days is QRP contests. 73, Barry N1EU _________________ Topband Re
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00140.html (9,827 bytes)

53. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 09:40:43 -0800
Before giving up on exporting it, cast about for text-based methods of exporting it to various spreadsheet programs. You may spend a week figuring out how to do it, but that's a LOT less than retypin
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00141.html (10,034 bytes)

54. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 13:03:03 -0500
It's interesting to see people complaining about general contest issues when the thread is specifically about the Stew Perry. Some clearly are clueless about the Stew Perry format. All one has to do
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00144.html (9,128 bytes)

55. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 20:26:49 +0100
How? I donīt remember any rig at that time showing signal strength correctly and I started in the hobby in 1958. Only a few modern SDR rigs do it nowadays. And how to you report genuine signal streng
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00146.html (9,220 bytes)

56. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 14:45:44 -0600
ENOUGH of this silly bickering! Ham radio is supposed to be FUN! (Remember that? You know, where we smile, and get a warm fuzzy feeling? :-) Instead, some curmudgeons chose to frown, pout, fume and f
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00148.html (9,052 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 56
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu