Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Stew\s+Beef\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Stew\s+Beef\s*$/: 56 ]

Total 56 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1): Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 14:03:40 -0600; Bill, I'm not familiar with what you are using on 160m or how often you get on the band, but just because you have never noticed any DX activity on a non-contest weekend does not mean it is not there; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00054.html (10,158 bytes)
22. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 12:12:52 -0800; I would like to point out that we all have different perspectives and should allow that some people are going to look at things differently than ourselves. Trying to call someone's position "ridiculo; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00055.html (11,645 bytes)
23. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>; Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:40:13 -0500; For me, unless I use the amp, I get more DX on quiet nights than during a contest on 160. The more powerful stations always trump me when it comes to DX but while I'd rather make the contest DX Q, it; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00058.html (9,502 bytes)
24. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1): Author: mstangelo@comcast.net; Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 22:31:11 +0000 (UTC); Tree, The contests may operate 10 nights a year but those nights are usually weekend when I, as well as others, have time to operate on the Topband. Why not take advantage of the unused nights and sc; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00059.html (9,115 bytes)
25. Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1): Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 20:34:14 -0500; The Stew Perry contest is one of the better ones but I agree with Larry and Does sound concerned, nice, fair, decent, honorable, etc. But... We already have the winter Stew and a warm-up Stew. Have h; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00060.html (10,836 bytes)
26. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1): Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 19:41:36 -0600; I don't see DX activity tapering off in March. Heard, Cocos (Keeling), Juan de Nova and Iran show up on my calendar as potentials for March 2016. I worked my first 160m Vietnam in March 2014. That s; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00061.html (11,716 bytes)
27. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 19:50:28 -0600; Tree and Gary, Very well said indeed. It's about "tolerance" and the Golden Rule. "Tolerance is giving to every other human being every right that you claim for yourself." --Robert Green Ingersoll "I; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00062.html (9,379 bytes)
28. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 20:18:19 -0800; There's a segment about 5 kHz wide that is quite active 7 nights a week with three of K1JT's digital modes -- WSPR (the one-way propagation monitor), JT65 and JT9, both of which are used for 2-way, w; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00065.html (9,937 bytes)
29. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1): Author: Kris Mraz <n5kilomike@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 23:48:17 -0600; I, too, have to agree with Larry, K5RK. From my location in NTX in a noisy urban area I struggle to hear any 160m DX (using an SAL-20 RX antenna). Last week there was a thread about a "Huge NA-EU ope; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00066.html (10,083 bytes)
30. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1): Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 09:18:14 -0500; Gary, while I am primarily a contester, I have been surprised by the amount of EU DX I can work on some non-contest nights. I agree with you; I have to say my best nights on 160M are in fact non-cont; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00067.html (12,160 bytes)
31. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1): Author: "lmlangenfeld@tds.net" <lmlangenfeld@tds.net>; Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:13:06 -0500 (EST); Without taking a particular position on this issue, I have to wonder if any consideration has been given to this contest's namesake. How, exactly, would Stew Perry have felt about more contests (espe; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00069.html (8,359 bytes)
32. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1): Author: James Rodenkirch <Rodenkirch_LLC@msn.com>; Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:25:56 +0000; Mark - I'm with you, sort of....I love contests, especially those with QRP categories AND, as a QRP afficionado, I do wish more hams would get on the air on Top Band just for the sake of making QSOs; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00070.html (9,355 bytes)
33. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1): Author: W7RH <midnight18@cox.net>; Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 21:13:43 -0800; Some scattered thoughts. This topic has been discussed before but found new life with the planned addition of a Spring Stew Perry contest. As a die hard 160m fan an additional minor contest or two ha; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00093.html (8,990 bytes)
34. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1): Author: Donald Chester <k4kyv@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 17:35:42 +0000; I have never been a contest lover, but I did work the CQ 160m CW contest a couple of times, back in the LORAN days, and once won top score for my state. Only thing, there were but three other logs; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00102.html (9,664 bytes)
35. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1): Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 08:12:31 -0600; I completely agree with Don on this. the incessant and utterly meaningless "599" or "59" because it is programmed in and the operator too lazy to think about a real signal report makes the minimal va; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00121.html (9,147 bytes)
36. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1): Author: kolson@rcn.com; Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 09:49:18 -0500 (EST); "Back when the signal report was a real part of the exchange and contesters tended to exchange honest reports, a major contest could be an opportunity to determine how well your station got out" The; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00122.html (10,523 bytes)
37. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 09:51:59 -0500; Sorry, I think this is nonsense, especially directed toward SPTBDC. If you want to know "how well you got out" and better yet, how well you're hearing, just look at your results listing in columns Be; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00123.html (9,839 bytes)
38. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1): Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 09:06:38 -0600; What I often do during a phone contest exchange is omit the signal report and only give out the section, serial number, etc. Very few operators request the signal report and when they do I reply 'my; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00124.html (10,144 bytes)
39. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1): Author: Cecil Acuff <chacuff@cableone.net>; Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 09:23:59 -0600; Touché.... _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00125.html (8,737 bytes)
40. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1): Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:24:59 -0500; Especially on 160 meters I don't think the S in RST has a lot of scientific value since there is no real numerical standard as it relates to true signal strength. In my own mind I have come up with a; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00126.html (11,400 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]